The politically-correct aim for ‘equality’ between ‘men’ and ‘women’ is not achievable.
It is absolutely impossible.
It will never be found.
It will never be discovered.
It will never happen.
The search for ‘equality’ between ‘men’ and ‘women’ is fuelling a never-ending war between ‘men’ and ‘women’.
The more aggressive and energetic is this nonsensical search for ‘equality’ between ‘men’ and ‘women’ , the more aggressive and energetic will be the war (i.e. the hostility) between ‘men and ‘women’.
To try to highlight this, notice that there is no ‘equitable’ solution even to this very simple question …
Question: Should ‘women’ have more votes than ‘men’?
For those who think, Yes, (because there are more women voters than men voters) then it follows that they also believe that those in a minority should have less of a say in what affects them.
They believe that the largest group (women) should have the greatest power.
As such, ‘equality’ between ‘men’ and ‘women’ is already lost.
For those who think, No, (because this would be unfair on ‘men’) then it follows that they also believe that those in the majority should have less of a say in what affects them.
The Term Paper on Status Of Women Men Woman 2004
... gender roles society had prescribed and more emphasis on equality between men and women. Christ overthrew many centuries of Jewish law and custom. ... 7 When the bible is properly interpreted it teaches equality in men and women in various books, such as in Galatians 3: 28," ... he holds women in equal roles as men, to include mention of female apostles. The New Testament does not promote equality but does ...
They believe that the individual vote of a woman should be worth less than that of a man.
As such, ‘equality’ between ‘men’ and ‘women’ is already lost.
In other words, there is no solution to this question.
The search for ‘equality’ between ‘men’ and ‘women’ is like a dog chasing its own tail. It will always be out of reach. And the very act of chasing it is costing us a great deal and causing tremendous damage to us.
The solution that we need to seek is not ‘equality’ – because it will never be found.
The best that can be hoped for is that people are happy with what is happening.
The best that can be hoped for is that people are happy with what is happening.
For example, if I had to answer the question, “Should ‘women’ have more votes than ‘men’?” I would say, Yes (because there are more women voters than men voters).
But I would not be saying Yes in order to achieve ‘equality’. I would be saying Yes because, currently, it seems to be the better option – for the sake of peace, if nothing else.
And this, in fact, is what all this nonsense about ‘equality’ between ‘men’ and ‘women’ should really boil down to.
If men and women are equally happy with whatever is the issue of concern, then, if you like, some version of ‘equality’ has been achieved.
But the state of people’s happiness actually depends to a very large extent on the propaganda that envelops them.
If the propaganda tells them that they are badly off then their happiness levels will fall and their aggression levels will rise. If the propaganda tells them that they are doing well then their happiness levels will rise and their aggression levels will fall.
if people want ‘men’ and ‘women’ to be happy about each other then they need – amongst other things – to do their best to destroy all those forces that seek ‘equality’
And so if people want ‘men’ and ‘women’ to be happy about each other then they need – amon
