Macbeth Macbeth, the play that Shakespeare wrote is very different from the movie that was made years later. There are a few parts where the two are alike, but for the most part they are far from being the same play. The actors that are in the movie make everything seem so unrealistic and the play is more serious and truthful to the story that Shakespeare was trying to tell. I don’t know what happened during the making of the movie, Macbeth, but something went wrong.
First, the actors in the movie aren’t the greatest actors. Granted, the movie was made quite awhile ago and maybe there weren’t that many people that could truly act, they still made everything seem to fake and unrealistic. The fighting scenes were terrible. They were supposed to be serious and sad, but instead they were ridiculous and funny looking.
Maybe the movie would have been a little bit better if there were actually actors that knew how to act, but with the actors that are in the movie now it isn’t on the top of my list for the best movies I’ve ever seen. Second, the play seems to be serious and truthful about what may have happened back in the day, but the movie makes it seem very fake and almost funny at times. The movie doesn’t really portray what Shakespeare wrote in the book Macbeth, it makes the book seem as if it is trying to be humorous in some way. The movie is so unrealistic that it is almost the opposite of what the book is trying to tell. Third, I don’t know why the director of the movie decided to make it so different from the book.
The Essay on Versions Of Macbeth Understand Play Made
From seeing the movie Scotland Pennsylvania, the play Machomer, and another movie on Macbeth, I seemed to favor Scotland Pennsylvania the most. What made me favor Scotland PA over the other plays was that the language was easier to understand because it was of a more recent nature, the actions that they did were easy to comprehend with, and the fact that they put some ill humor in the movie made ...
Maybe to some people they are alike, but to me (considering I only saw half the movie because I was sick) the movie is completely different and unrealistic. Maybe the director didn’t plan on making the movie so fake and it was a great movie back in the day, but compared to today’s movies and compared to the book it wasn’t a very good movie. In conclusion, the movie and book were two different stories-one was realistic and the other was not. The movie has bad actors that don’t know how to fight without looking ridiculous and the book makes everything seem serious and real. I’m not sure why the director of the movie made the movie so different from the book, but there is probably a good reason for it.
