“Who’se life is it anyway” is a satisfying play on a dramatic and intellectual level. The play makes it satisfying by the entertainment and the dramatic death. It makes it dramatic because of the conflict and tension of the play. The play had bitter sweet catharsis which had a resolution of conflicting emotions and mixed feelings on the play. It was also humorous that was savage and black. The play is on an intellectual level because it picks both sides both sides of the argument and also the audience is feeling the dilemma of Ken which the audience sees as a big problem.
The play picks both sides of the argument, with one side is that Ken wanting to die and the other side doctors wanting him alive and to live, this crates two arguments and creates tension for the audience to know what’s going to happen next. What the audience is feeling towards Ken is that his dilemma is very bad and the audience has the alternative to choose what his going through and what his feeling. Throughout the concept of the play, the author uses dramatic irony on Ken by saying things that are sarcastic and making the audience think what he really means by saying all these ironically phrases.
The Term Paper on Richard Iii Play Audience True
Is Richard III a study of how to structure a play, or is it a study of how to gain political power? For different minds, Richard III could be percieved as a fine example of both how to structure a play and how to gain political power. Critics would probably be more intersted in the construction of Richard III than a person seeing the play for the first time. In my opinion, the configuration of ...
Throughout the play “Who’se life is it anyway” Brain Clark, the author uses dramatic irony on ken. “They’re perfectly safe with me, Sister” is what Ken says to the sister. Of course Ken wants the young sisters to take care of him because they are beautiful and Ken wanting them to stay with him, so he says that they will be safe with him. “If Doctor Scott could drill some holes in my head, you could blow in my ear and play me like an ocarina”, Ken says this in a very sarcastic way by making it humorous and making the audience laugh. By saying this he simply was just being sarcastic. “If I refuse, he’ll probably dissolve her in water and inject her into me” this is what Ken says to sister. What Ken is simply saying is just a joke and he says this because he has to see Mrs Boyle and he doesn’t want to, so he says a sarcastic sentence that describes what she would do if Ken doesn’t see her. Also the audience is enjoying all the funny things what Ken is saying. There is a lot of irony in the play and that’s why the play is exciting and enjoying to read and watch, but there is also the entertainment, the characters and the main subject of euthanasia of the play.
The play is satisfying because of the entertainment and the dramatic death of Ken due to euthanasia. The play is based on euthanasia and people wonder if it can be legal to all countries. The entertainment of the play is mostly the character Ken because he is the main victim of euthanasia. The play couldn’t be done without the other characters especially the beautiful nurses and the solicitors and a judge. Its also entertaining because the audience is wondering what is going to happen to Ken. The question the audience is asking to themselves is that “Is Ken going to die or is he going to live?”. The audience is then wanting to read on and if he wins the case. Entertainment is not all that make the play satisfying; the dramatic death of Ken makes it even more satisfying. The dramatic death creates tension and conflict in the play. The tension of the death of Ken makes the audience worry about him and what he has done to deserve to die. The conflict of Ken’s death has many worries on people’s faces. Some people disagree about the decision on Ken to die and it creates conflict towards other people.
The Essay on Euthanasia Good Death 2
The word "euthanasia" comes from the greek--eu, "good", and thanatos, "death". Literally, "good death". The dictionary describes euthanasia as "a quiet and easy death, the means of procuring this or, the action of inducing a quiet and easy death." Euthanasia has a becomes a legal, medical, and ethical issue over which opinions are divided. I feel that if there is no hope for a cure for a ...
The last concept of the play is the bitter sweet catharsis of the play. It was bitter sweet for Ken and his death because it was really bad how he died and how he was paralyzed for life but it was good for him to get what he wanted, and that was to die. He realized there was no point of living with no arms and legs, and the pain and suffering for him. This was bitter but sweet for Ken. The catharsis had a resolution of the conflicting emotions. There was resolution which that the dilemma of Ken had finally ended, with him choosing to die and wanting peace. There were mixed emotions when he died with all the characters all happy for him but sad how he had to die. The audience as well would feel the same thing, some feeling different to others.
It’s obvious that this play is based on euthanasia and Ken’s death demonstrates this. People argue that euthanasia should be legal and some believe it should be illegal, but in this case it was legal to Ken and got what he wanted. Euthanasia is a big issue throughout the world and action should be taken.
“Who’se life is it anyway” is a satisfying play on a dramatic and intellectual level because all of the reasons I just mentioned and a basis of euthanasia.