A basic argument used by creationists is that evolution is “only a theory and cannot be proven.” This creationist argument is based on the false assumption that the only way to “prove” evolution is for someone to actually observe large evolutionary changes, for example birds evolving from dinosaurs. Since this can’t be accomplished in a few lifetimes, creationists claim that “proving” evolution is impossible. This argument totally ignores the enormous amount of factual data that supports the position that present life forms are descended from primitive ancestors. Whether evolution is true or not depends on a careful and rational examination of the facts. A fact is something that is supported by clear and incontrovertible evidence. For example, the Grand Canyon cuts through layers of different kinds of rock, such as the Coconino sandstone, Hermit Shale, and Redwall limestone. These rock layers often contain fossils, and when a layer contains fossils, they are characteristic of that layer. Facts may be interpreted in different ways by different individuals, but that doesn’t change the facts themselves; they are incontrovertible. Another fact is that fossil skulls have been found that are intermediate in appearance between humans and modern apes.
They have brow ridges that are larger than humans, but smaller than apes; likewise their teeth and jaws are larger than humans, but smaller than modern apes. Numerous fossils have been found that are clearly intermediate between dinosaurs and birds and run the gamut from non-flying reptiles with feathers to birds that retain some reptilian characteristics, like Persons may interpret the meaning of these fossils in different ways, but that doesn’t alter the fact that Facts stand alone; they are independent of whether a person accepts evolution or rejects evolution. In the world of science there are easily a hundred thousand “facts” relating to biology, astronomy, geology, and so on. It is only natural to try to correlate all this information into explanations that make sense and that can predict other correlations. These explanations and correlations provide the In any language, usage determines the meaning of a word. In science, the meaning of the word “theory” has been clearly established by usage; its fundamental meaning is a logical explanation based on all the available evidence. In order for theories to be given credence by the scientific community, they must be capable of predicting further correlations.
The Essay on Human Evolution 6
Evolution is the complexity of processes by which living organisms established on earth and have been expanded and modified through theorized changes in form and function. Human evolution is the biological and cultural development of the species Homo sapiens sapiens, or human beings. Humans evolved from apes because of their similarities. This can be shown in the evidence that humans had a ...
Theories may be good, bad, or indifferent. They may be well established by the factual evidence, or they may lack credibility. But theories only explain the facts; they are not the facts themselves. The statement that evolution is “a theory, not a fact” is based on the belief that a theory is something that can not be proven, and therefore is not a “fact.” This view grossly distorts the meanings of the words “theory” and “fact,” and diverts attention from the large amount of factual evidence supporting A basic argument used by creationists is that evolution is “only a theory and cannot be proven.” This creationist argument is based on the false assumption that the only way to “prove” evolution is for someone to actually observe large evolutionary changes, for example birds evolving from dinosaurs. Since this can’t be accomplished in a few lifetimes, creationists claim that “proving” evolution is impossible. This argument totally ignores the enormous amount of factual data that supports the position that present life forms are descended from primitive ancestors. Whether evolution is true or not depends on a careful and rational examination of the facts.
A fact is something that is supported by clear and incontrovertible evidence. For example, the Grand Canyon cuts through layers of different kinds of rock, such as the Coconino sandstone, Hermit Shale, and Redwall limestone. These rock layers often contain fossils, and when a layer contains fossils, they are characteristic of that layer. Facts may be interpreted in different ways by different individuals, but that doesn’t change the facts themselves; they are incontrovertible. Another fact is that fossil skulls have been found that are intermediate in appearance between humans and modern apes. They have brow ridges that are larger than humans, but smaller than apes; likewise their teeth and jaws are larger than humans, but smaller than modern apes. Numerous fossils have been found that are clearly intermediate between dinosaurs and birds and run the gamut from non-flying reptiles with feathers to birds that retain some reptilian characteristics, like Persons may interpret the meaning of these fossils in different ways, but that doesn’t alter the fact that Facts stand alone; they are independent of whether a person accepts evolution or rejects evolution. In the world of science there are easily a hundred thousand “facts” relating to biology, astronomy, geology, and so on.
The Essay on Public Schools Theory Evolution Evidence
In my humble opinion, I think public schools have the right to teach about anything they want. Hence the word "public" schools, parents should have that authority as to whether or not they want their child to attend a school where teachings can get disobedient to their religious belief or not. That's why there is a private school. Anybody can believe in God. But, when there is an answer to a ...
It is only natural to try to correlate all this information into explanations that make sense and that can predict other correlations. These explanations and correlations provide the In any language, usage determines the meaning of a word. In science, the meaning of the word “theory” has been clearly established by usage; its fundamental meaning is a logical explanation based on all the available evidence. In order for theories to be given credence by the scientific community, they must be capable of predicting further correlations. Theories may be good, bad, or indifferent. They may be well established by the factual evidence, or they may lack credibility. But theories only explain the facts; they are not the facts themselves. The statement that evolution is “a theory, not a fact” is based on the belief that a theory is something that can not be proven, and therefore is not a “fact.” This view grossly distorts the meanings of the words “theory” and “fact,” and diverts attention from the large amount of factual evidence supporting ? 1996 Frank Steiger; permission granted for retransmission. The flood was created by God to “cleanse” the world of mankind, which (in God’s judgement), had become wicked and therefore a source of disappointment to God.
The Essay on Amazon Animals Rainforest Species Million
o At least 42 million acres of tropical forest are lost each year, an area the size of Washington State. This equals about 100 acres a minute. o An estimated 50, 000 species of plants and animals, mostly plants and invertebrates and mostly in the tropics, are condemned to extinction every year, an average of about 140 a day. The forests of today are comprised of 50% boreal (mainly northern ...
All men, women, children, and babies (except for Noah and his family) were killed by drowning. A large wooden ship was constructed by Noah, or at least under his direction. The ship was approximately 450 feet long and had stalls and pens sufficient to accommodate every species of bird and land animal now existing. (Some creationists believe that the ark sequestered every species of land animal that ever existed.) Prior to the flood one male and one female of every species was motivated to travel, and did travel, from all over the world to the ark. Although there are thousands of species of present-day birds and land animals, this is the result of diversification; the total number of species at the time of Noah was probably much smaller. Although there were only eight persons on board to feed and clean up after all the animals, the work load was considerably reduced by the fact that the animals were kept in the dark and therefore entered into a state of hibernation. The earth’s human population and all present-day species of birds and land animals are all descendants of the Noah’s ark survivors. There have been numerous aerial sightings and eyewitness accounts of persons who have actually seen the ark close up on the slopes Mount Ararat in eastern Turkey.
Constructing a wooden ship the size of the ark in times of antiquity would require an enormous expenditure of labor and materials. Where did Noah, by all accounts an ordinary man, obtain the Wooden ships do not withstand violent wind and wave forces very well, and this is particularly true for large wooden ships. The longest modern wooden ships are about 300 feet long, and require steel The contention that a wooden ship 450 feet long could withstand the catastrophic forces postulated in the creationist scenario has to be met with considerable skepticism. There are over a hundred thousand separate and distinct species of present day birds and land animals. It would be physically impossible for eight persons (Noah, his wife, his three sons and their wives) to provide for the care and feeding of all the flies, termites, worms, snails, fleas, bats, frogs, spiders, bark beetles, intestinal parasites, etc, etc. Then of course we have several hundred species of larger animals that require 50 to 100 pounds of fodder per day: hippos, rhinos, buffalo, elephants, horses, cattle, giraffes, elk. moose, etc, etc. (Not to mention the enormous grazing dinosaurs that some creationists believe were sequestered in the Many, if not most, plants and/or their seeds will not survive a year under water.
The Essay on Animals In Other Island Noah God Animal
In the beginning before the great storm, lived a follower of god named Noah. The Earth had only one continent with many beautiful animals. Noah the watcher of these creatures received a message from god. One night, Noah prayed to God for an answer of why the animals seemed uneasy lately and how to solve it, god then let him in on the secret of the great storm to come. God then told Noah to take ...
Did Noah transplant trees from all over the world into tubs to store in the ark, and if so, how did he manage to acquire Don’t forget the meat eating animals. How did Noah acquire the tons of meat required for the diet of all those lions, tigers, hyenas, wolves, etc? (Not to mention Tyranosaurus Rex, Allosaurus, and all the rest!) In order for predatory animals like lions, wolves, etc. to survive, they must be outnumbered by their prey by at least a hundred to one. If each grazing animal and each predatory animal were represented by a single pair, then either all the grazing animals would be immediately eaten, or the predatory animals would starve to death, or both. The only other alternative would be for Noah and his descendants to have enough fresh meat stored to feed generations of lions, tigers, wolves, hyenas, foxes, eagles, hawks, etc. This scenario is totally preposterous! Many animals require special diets. Koalas eat only eucalyptus leaves. Aphids require fresh plants. How would Noah know about these dietary requirements, and how would he obtain food meeting The logistics of stocking the food and feeding the animals is clearly a complete impossibility for eight persons! Just shoveling out the manure would a total impossibility; tons of food per day necessarily Unless all those animals happened to be living in the immediate neighborhood (very unlikely, considering the different habitats of rain forest tree frogs, desert geckos, and polar bears), most of them would have to travel over large distances to get to the ark, a physical impossibility.
The Essay on Creation Science Creationists Evolution Theory
It is interesting to note how "Creation Science" is being propagated as a "Science" (as what we have so far understood "Science" to mean) and how it attempts to establish itself by debunking Evolution. Creation Scientists, are actually science professionals with accredited Science degrees, but who claim that all Creation of matter is by an act of a Creator and that: - All basic plants and animal ...
Besides, what could possibly motivate all those frogs, lizards, snakes, salamanders, dragon flies, spiders, ants, etc to leave their natural habitats and attempt to travel thousands of miles to the ark? How could they possibly make the journey? How would they know how to get there? The Bible states in Gen 7:4 that the ark was loaded in 7 days. The nine million species of animals extant would would have to board at a rate of 30 animals per second! The creationist claim that diversification has resulted in present-day species being far more numerous than the number of species in the ark contradicts their claim that evolution of species could not, and Keeping in mind that hibernation is not merely sleep, but rather a state of suspended animation, just keeping an animal in the dark will not cause it to hibernate. Most animals do not hibernate under any conditions, least of all in a ship violently tossed about under catastrophic storm conditions. How did all the present-day parasites and diseases survive the flood without decimating the host In spite of all the reported sightings of the ark on Mount Ararat, there hasn’t been a single set of clear photographs showing the exact location and appearance of the ark.
The alleged sightings have never been verified by any reputable organization, such as the National Geographic Society. Additional information is available in talk.origins faq: Problems with a Global Flood by Ross L., Creation vs. Evolution II Team Member For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. Ever since the creation of the world his eternal power and divine nature, invisible though they are, have been understood and seen through the things he has made. Romans 1:19-20. version of creation found in the Bible in the book of Genesis. In this account, God created the Universe, including the Earth and all the creatures in it, in seven days. Most Creationists believe this means seven twenty-four hour days. Other Christians and Jews believe the seven days symbolize Rather than having life begin in very simple forms – proteins, bacteria, algae, etc., and then gradually evolve into more complex forms, the theory of creation says that creatures started out as distinct and separate organisms when God created them. Although these distinct creatures have the capability to adapt to their surroundings to a certain extent, Creationists do not believe that they change into completely different and distinct animals through evolution.
The Term Paper on Digestive Tract Species Body Animals
A brief description of the phylum and their classes. By Ashley Ellison I. Acanthocephalan-any of an intestinal worms lacking a digestive tract and having a proboscis bearing rows of thorn like hooks II. Annelids- any of roundish, wormlike animals having long, segmented bodies, a brain and ventral nerve cord, and a closed circulatory system, including polychaetes, oligochaetes, and leeches A. ...
For example, Creationists do not believe that single-celled organisms evolved into more complex plants and animals, finally culminating in Creationists are among the harshest critics of the theory of evolution. They have been instrumental in pointing out weaknesses in the scientific evidence. What are those weaknesses? Although there is plenty of evidence for adaptive changes in species (microevolution), we do not in recorded history see one species becoming an entirely different, more highly evolved organism. For example, we have no examples in recorded history of a fish becoming an amphibian or even a bacteria evolving into anything other than a bacteria. The fossil record does not show the gradual changes that Darwin predicted. There can be errors in carbon dating and other methods that are used to determine the age of DNA and RNA comparisons between similar and dissimilar species at times confirm evolution, but in other circumstances are inconsistent. Finally, besides criticizing portions of various theories of how life evolved, Creationists are actively seeking scientific evidence of their own to support the creation account as it is presented in Genesis.
