Montrosity is a key in Frankenstein, and it affects both the Creature and Victor, whilst at the same time , Shelley argues that society is monstrous through injustices of the time and the social conventions. Frankenstein could be said to be the monster himself- when he says “miserable monster” whom “I had created”, we see Shelley implicitly suggest, through the alliterative phrase, that just as “Adam was created in God’s image” so too was the Creature born in the image of Victor. Moreover, the idea that Frankenstein is himself the monster is reinforced by “or rather cell”. “Cell” refers to a prison cell, and is used symbolically to represent the idea that just like a cell is for criminals, who perform acts of monstrousity, so to is Frankenstein the “criminal” commiting an act of “monstrosity”. On the other hand, we could argue that it was not so much the act of creation that was monstrous, but rather Frankenstein’s reaction. By writing “I ran out of the room” we see Victor perform the ultimate rejection, and therefore, shunning the responsibilty that exists in the binary between “Parent” and “Child”- as John McRae argued.
It is interesting to note that Frankenstein rejects the monster because of an innate selfishness- “the beauty of the dream vanished” implies that Frankenstein’s physical conception does not equal that of his mental conception, and that because Frankenstein’s plan are in disarray, his rational scientific methods- “I selected…in proportion” show this- are replaced by emotional responses; which for him, is territory unknown- in the same way Walton seeks to “ascertain the secrets” or how the Creature wants to understand human behaviour at the De Lacy’s. Thus, we see a connection between Victor and the Creature- whom he describes as “miserbale monster”.
The Essay on Frankenstein Monster Creation Creator
What qualifies a creature to be a monster? When the movie Frankenstein came out, monsters were usually big and scary animals that terrified everyone that walked in their path. They were creatures that generally behaved monstrously, doing things that were against society norms and had no consideration for the safety of others. Perhaps looking beyond the physical appearance of a "monster" and just ...
Furthermore, the fact that Frankenstein can only respond to the Creature’s birth in empirical, scientific observations- “pearly white teeth, dull eyes”- constrasts with Elizabeth’s response to William’s death- “O I have murdered my child”. By portraying Elizabeth in a positive light- she forms an emotional response, which juxtaposes with the sterile feelings of Frankenstein at the conception of the Creatue, Shelley implies that women present a greater degree of humanity- and thus criticises the male dominated society on education- whilst they may read “Shakespeare” and “Agrippa”, women will be worldly-wise, (no doubt influence by her feminist mother) and that they are necessary to prevent monstrosities.
This idea of the female role is reinforced by the fact that as the novel progresses, the women are slowly being removed- first his Mother, then Justine and then Elizabeth- “I saw Elizabeth…held the corpse of my dead mother”. This presents Frankenstein’s mental degregation and ultimately, the ctalyst for the mosntrous act- so Shelley presents the idea of a dichotomy between man and women- Darwin supported this by suggesting the hierachy of reproducion- man and woman is better than man alone. However, it could also be argued that Frankenstein’s settings augment his monstrousity- we see a sense of isolation- “solitude” is repeated, implying that by imposing self-exile, Frankenstein detaches himself from society and its rules and that he has become an “outsider” (McCrae)- much as the monstrousity that Victor calls the Creature, is also an outsider.
Indeed the connection between the two is best examined by the Shelley use of the mountain-top- “Chamonuix, where I saw him”- which alludes to the idea of the Creator and Creation meeting (Hayward), both as equal, with both, arguably as montrous, Victor for abondoning the Creature, and the Creature (for Victor) a representation fo his failure. By using “Solitude and “ Filthy Workshop of Creation”, Shelley implies that this isolation leads to thoughts of monstrousity- Godwin influecned her argiung it “was a nusery of madmen”. This separation from society is symbolic too. If Geneva is “Eden”, then by extending against the limits of knowledge-“if no man broke the rules” suggests no remorse- he cut himself off, much like Lucifer in Paradise Lost- and thus, Shelley implies that this inner monster within Frankenstein and all of us, can only be restrained by a balance- whether, male or female, or equal laws.
The Essay on Mary Shelley – Frankenstein Question 2
19th Century Novel Essay Mary Shelley - Frankenstein Question 2 Many critics have commented that the creature is, ultimately, a character with whom we sympathise. How far do you agree? It is very easy for us to sympathise with Frankenstein’s monster yet as the story progresses we must take into account his murderous nature as his thoughts become committed to revenge. From the creatures ‘birth’ ...
The idea that the monstrousity is within Frankenstein (and therefore us) is suggested by “wildness in his eyes”- he claims the Creature to be “wild”, but if the eyes are “windows to the sould”, Shelley suggests and innate montrosity in him (and us); an “id” that is the carnal desires. This contrasts the idea of the Monster’s “dull eyes”- which challenges the idea that the Creature is the monstrosity- this challenge is the reason why Shelley uses the Chinese Box Narrative- the various “narritve eyes” makes us formulate our own judgement. In fact, the Moster, may be the most human of us all- he “imitates the physiognamy and manners” in the same way that Justine did, yet both are treated unfairly.
This idea of an unfair treatment alludes to Shelley’s belief that monstorusity exists in society- so whilst we can say it was Victor’s nature to be monstorus (and that society placed limits to prevent this), the nurturing of him within society is what leads to the monstrosity arguably. In the case of the Justine, the irony is that she is treated “un-JUSTlY” contrary to her name- which perhaps could be Shelley’s sly reference to her desire for female eqaulity (influenced by Wollstencraft –the feminist motehr) – a name is afforded to all, and Justine’s name contain’s justice- therefore, when she “is found guilty”- there is a trangression of nature, in the same way that Frankenstein transgresses nature by creating life.
This presents the idea that society is too quick to judge- just as Frankenstein believes “seemingly to grab me”, Justine is quickly found guilty- regardless of Elizabeth’s plea- no wonder Shelley present s the law in such a negative light- “judge…meddle in the dark side of human nature”, because it is flawed and makes rash decisions. Thus, we see Shelley regard society as the monster. To conclude, monstrosity is pervades throughout the novel, affecting all characters and being influenced by setting and society. Yet, in the same way that the Creature was Frankenstein’s creation, the novel coould be seen as her monster-shunned by contempories but exposing the reatiy of monstrosity within us all.
The Essay on Shelleys Life Mary Frankenstein Written
God Makes All Things Good, Man Meddles With Them And They Become Evil. Show How Frankenstein Illus Mary Shelley wrote the novel Frankenstein in the early part of the nineteenth century. Frankenstein has been considered as possibly the first gothic novel. The novel was written at a time when Mary Shelley and her husband Percy were staying at the home of Lord Byron on the shores of Lake Geneva. Mary ...
