In William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, two interesting forces, fate and free will, are shown competing for prominence over the other. Fate was exemplified in the many prophecies and omens the characters viewed throughout the play. Free will was the characters abilities to overcome and defeat their fate. Many characters have struggles with the power of their free will overcoming their fate, namely Caesar, Cassius, and Brutus. Although in the end all three of those characters succumb to their fate, Shakespeare shows that there is a delicate equilibrium between the two forces. Of the three men, Caesar’s fate seemed most obvious to him and to the reader.
However, Caesar used his free will in many instances to in large part ignore his destiny, which fate has presented. On one occasion in the beginning of the play, a soothsayer warns Caesar to “Beware the ides of March” (I. i. 23).
Caesar pays more attention to the appearance of the soothsayer then to the warning; and, finding the appearance not to his liking, Caesar ignores the warning and passes him off as a dreamer.
Later, on the Ides of March, he confronts the soothsayer, and says that “the ides of March have come” (III. i. 1).
Caesar was confident that the soothsayer was wrong that he did not even consider what the rest of the day had in store for him.
Earlier that day, Caesar had almost made a choice to heed the omen of his fate presented to Calphurnia in her dream. However, his pride presented itself as Decius Brutus gave him an alternate way to interpret the dream. Instead of viewing it correctly as Calphurnia had shown him, he used the lame explanation provided by Decius so that he would not appear afraid before the Senate. Even on the trip to the Senate, he had an opportunity to see the exact plan for his death.
The Essay on Oedipus And Fate Character Play Destiny
To what extent is Oedipus responsible for his own fate Before we approach this complex question inductively, we are at first obliged to contemplate what definitions and assumptions are being made. This essay, perhaps more so than others, requires a more extensive look at this aspect of the question, because of the sheer variety of possible responses. However, I now have reduced them to three ...
But his patriotism, or possibly his false humility, propelled him to say “What touches us ourself shall be last served” (III. i. 8).
Through all of these times where his free will could have helped Caesar avoid his fate, he instead chose to ignore them, ultimately leading to his downfall.
Cassius, up to the end of the play, was very aware of his fate and took the largest strides to overcome that. This is due to the fact that Cassius followed the Epicurean philosophy, which believes that the gods do not involve themselves directly in the fate of man. This belief was highlighted when he told Brutus “Men at some time are masters of their fates: the fault, dear Brutus, is not in our starts, but in ourselves, that we are underlings” (I. ii.
139-141).
Because of this belief, he never resigned himself to live in the world in its current state. He always felt that there was something he could do to better his standing in life. This diligent effort to better himself led Caesar to comment “such men as he… are very dangerous” (I.
ii. 209-210).
Cassius’ role in the play was using his free will to overcome the fate that would come true, the fate that Caesar was one day going to become emperor. Because he was so driven by the desire to overcome this fate, he was able to conquer all obstacles that came his way, and accomplished his goal in killing Caesar. Towards the end of the play, however, Cassius states that he has changed his mind and the gods are not looking favorably on their mission.
Here he died by his own sword because he felt that his fate, as illustrated by the eagles, was too overwhelming to defeat. Brutus had a very conflicting viewpoint than that of Cassius. Brutus was a stoic; meaning he believed that bad things would not happen to good people, the gods would not allow bad things to happen. He flowed along in life, not taking rash action like Cassius, but accepting things as they came because it was the will of the gods.
The Essay on Caesar, Cassius & Brutus as Tragic heros
This year in English, we have studied many different characters. We have studied the works from Ancient Greece, England, about King Arthur, and of Oedipus, just to name a few. One type of character we have studied throughout this year is the tragic hero. This character starts high, and falls low due to a tragic flaw. Throughout historical liturature, a person can find these tragic heros. In the ...
This stance is what required Cassius to go through so much effort to persuade Brutus to join the conspirators. He was forced to write fake letters so that Brutus could see a reason to act on Caesar becoming emperor. He also died through a form of apathy brought about by what he thought was his fate. The ghost of Caesar had visited him twice and had affected his rationalization that he told Volumnius “I know my hour is come” (V. v. 19).
Through all three of these characters, Shakespeare has made a point to show that indifference towards fate leads towards permanent consequences, death. In Cassius’s itu ation, he was strong until that final point came, where he accepted his final fate. Brutus was never very strong with using his free will, but in the end accepted his fate much the same as Cassius. Caesar was never very strong in using his free will, but chose a nobler route to defying his fate. Thus Caesar declares: “It seems to me… it will come” (II.
ii. 35-37).
In other words, Caesar recognizes that certain events lie beyond human control; to crouch in fear of them is to enter a paralysis equal to, if not worse than, death. It is to surrender any capacity for freedom and agency that one might actually possess. Using all three of their deaths as an example, it seems Shakespeare was showing that free will must be used vigilantly, and if one was to let their guard down, fate will overcome all efforts of will.
