In my opinion, Brently treated her wife fairly as dictated by social norms of the time. Mrs. Mallard utterance of those words was not an implication of an unhealthy and brutal marriage but was more a declaration of Mrs. Mallard new found sense of independence, a sort of unbinding from the social chains of familial duty.
The closing of the door and the opening of the window was very much symbolic to Mrs. Mallard’s closing of one aspect of her life, her marriage, and an advent of life of new possibilities. In a sense, it was a certain kind of freedom of socially-imposed “prison” of some sort. Mrs. Mallard, at the knowledge of the news, begins to feel a previously unknown sense of freedom and relief. She fights her own sense of awakening.
As she imagines life without her husband, she embraces visions of the future. She realizes that whether or not she had loved him was less important than “this possession of self-assertion” she now feels. The happiness Louise gains by this recognition of selfhood. The doctor statement, which could have very much been spoken by Josephine and Brently, was more a literary device, suspending basic personal truths to a realm of speculative opinions and outlooks. Marriage for women at those times was more of a one-sided arrangement in favor for the male species. Although one might argue that, at present, this is less prevalent.
But the fact remains that gender bias is still incorporated into society in much subtle ways. This is very much how Mrs. Mallard felt towards her marriage. Her happiness was much subordinated by her sense of duty. Duty was highly regarded in Victorian view of morality. The symbolic travel is Mrs.
The Term Paper on Mrs Mallard Calixta Marriage Literature
... his death, Mrs. Mallard envisioned her freedom from the marriage. The immoral behavior displayed by Mrs. Mallard is shocking. ... our best to manage everything in our lives. Mrs. Mallard was so burdened by his death, ... its significance." Mrs. Mallard heard the news differently than anyone else, in the sense that she ... it is their duty to enforce their own beliefs on others. Mrs. Mallard was not concerned ...
Mallard’s personal journey of liberation paved by a sense of foreboding and tinge of sweet joy. Meanwhile, the complexity of William Faulkner’s short story “A Rose for Emily” resides in the fact that it does not merely concentrate in narrating the eerie life story of Emily Greirson. Thus, unlike the other modernist stories of Faulkner’s time, “A Rose for Emily” does not simply imply that her individual eccentricities are the results of her individual will and choices. Rather with deeper analysis, we find out that the story tells us another story within the surface reading. It is one which informs us about the significant historical change in America during the late 1800 s. And the character of Emily becomes a means to point out that the society and the culture a person is in, plays an enormous part in determining the limitations and possibilities of her life.
An analysis of the setting of the story would yield vital information on the historical background of this southern American society. Characters also provide a very significant area of analysis. This is because they have distinct values, beliefs, and characteristics that provide clues to the society’s dominant and residual ideology and culture. The characters are often used as symbols for these ideologies. Therefore, their antagonism with each other is also symbolic of the antagonism present in the society’s culture and ideology during its particular period.
