“Chivalry is a set of professional ethics and expectations, guiding the behavior of the warrior classes of medieval Europe.” To understand chivalry, one must look even earlier in time to observe the history of combat. Though some cavalries rode horses as early as A. D. 376, they utilized the animals only as a source of transportation and the combats were fought on foot. This went on until the invention of the stirrup came from Asia which allowed the warrior to remain on his horse and be able to hold himself steady while defending himself from enemies. At around 1150, the society had begun to embrace horses in combat which became an advantage until the development of firearms.
It was here that men in shining armor, also recognized as knights, began to be popular. Medieval warfare now focused more on the individual and single combats. Each knight acquired a “coat of arms” which was a symbol that varied among families, and it helped with their identification. With the addition of armors, combat became expensive.
This meant that the knight needed to be wealthy. In order to become a knight, steps had to be taken. A young man, for instance, would need to become a squire and serve as an apprentice to a knight for years, before he can be dubbed a knight. Fighting was now more of an art than violence. This all began with the influential role of the church and their constant goal of limiting violence. Chivalry was also influenced by the “notion that a war could be holy.” This almost served and was utilized as an excuse to fight, knowing that you are fighting for holy reasons.
The Essay on The Knight And Chivalry A Critical Review Of Richard Barber
Richard Barber first published The Knight and Chivalry in 1970. At the time, not a whole lot had been written on the subject of chivalry. Thus, Barber can be viewed is sort of an original scholarly writer on this subject matter. His work is extensive. In this particular book he covers the following concepts: the transition of the Knight from mounted warrior, chivalry and literature, chivalry in ...
Chivalry not only aimed towards constructive use of violence, but it also taught the knights how to carry themselves in the battlefield as well as with women. It also brought about “courtly love”, which was a relationship between a knight and his lady. The troubadours from southeast France wrote their poetry mainly with themes of love and pain. This courtly love is said to have four stages, first beginning with “hesitating.” This is when the lover does not know how to express himself and let the lady know how he feels. The next stage is “pleading” where he tells the lady he loves her. The third stage, “hearing,” is when the lady says no to the lover but she plays both sides of possibly accepting or rejecting him.
The last and fourth stage, “service,” is when the lady accepts her lover and they are bonded together. David Herlihy, Henry Charles Lea Professor of Medieval History and author of this article, “When Knighthood Was in Flower,” began his article with the feminist critics who have taken offense to the idea of chivalry. They believed that chivalry embodied the women to be attractive, but it also exemplified them as being nonhuman, almost as if not having emotions or intellect to act and speak for herself. Chivalry, as Herlihy stated, had put limitation on women which led to the feminist critics to advocate the androgynous personality where both male and female carry responsibilities of both sexes. In the relationship women, he also states that the society, which embraced chivalry, was perhaps almost unwelcoming of women. The eldest son inherits the land of the family while the daughters are left with nothing.
The marriages, during earlier times, were also paid and managed by the groom but, at this point in time, the family’s bride were now expected to pay for the costs. This meant that women from poor families had the least chance of marrying. But as time progressed, things began to look brighter for the women. When married, they took over the land in place of the husband, who would be out fighting battles. Their importance was clearly present. Many knights, also, refer to themselves with the use of metronymic, which used his mother’s last name as opposed to his father.
The Essay on Women And Virgil Aeneas Courage Family
How Virgil Saw Women Maxwell C. Bexley In The Aeneid of Virgil, Virgil creatively discusses his view of women in Roman society. He used characteristics that were common among all of his women roles yet each woman had strength in one of the categories. The characteristics of the women can be broken down into a group that is called pietas, which are the virtuous displays of courage with undying love ...
As a result, the mothers became known around the area. Clearly, the women had an effect in society, though not as big as they may have wished. However, as the later Middle Ages approached, the ladies became less active in society and began to carry on with the feminist critics’ description of the ladies on pedestals. Though this was so, change was and always will be inevitable.
