A film adaptation of a book can be like hearsay. The author writes a novel to send a certain message. Someone else reads it interprets it in a different way and talks to a film producer. The film producers then take its, leaves out major events, change the ending and make a film with a completely different message than the author. The author then screams bloody murder then takes his cut from the box office. Joesph Boggs, the author of Problems with Adaptation, says “We expect the film to duplicate exactly the experience we had seeing the play or in reading the novel. That is, of course, completely impossible” (Boggs 672).
No one told this theory to David Fincher, the director of Fight Club. Fincher stuck almost like glue to the novel. He did however, change a few events in the novel and the ending but stills successfully puts Palahniuk’s words on screen that even made Palahniuk happy to earn his profits. Most of the changes Fincher made to Palahniuk novel were minor and insignificant. One example is the fat Tyler and the narrator used to make soap. In the novel, they steal the fat from Marla. Marla was keeping her mother’s liposuction fat for her own plastic surgery. They steal the fat and store it in the Paper Street Soap Company’s fridge.
In the movie, Fincher had Tyler and the Narrator steal it from a plastic surgery dumpster. In the novels version it could be interpreted as another thing the narrator has done to hurt Marla. Fincher’s version gives the audience some humor to see the two characters struggle to smuggle fat. The film still does a good job in emphasizing the damage the narrator does to Marla. Another minor change was how the narrator met Tyler. In the movie, it says they met on the airplane while he was traveling on the business trip. In the book they met at a nude beach. He went to a nude beach to take a rest from the world ‘and somehow, by accident, Tyler and I met.’ Palahniuk is trying to use the nude beach and the nude Tyler as symbolism for birth.
The Term Paper on Going On Instinct Gendering Primatology In Film
Going on Instinct: Gendering Primatology in Film Melinda Kanner dwells on popular construction of primatology by the example of the films Instinct (1999) and Gorillas in the Mist (1988). The author is concerned with the question of how cultural preoccupations and tensions are revealed in [these] creations of essentially new versions of professions (Kanner n.p.) as the practices of medicine, ...
When a baby is born, they are naked with no clothing. Tyler was born with no clothing either. Fincher decided not to in that direction and instead the two have a very humorous conversation about emergency exits. Fincher probably decided that the humor aspect of the confrontation would have more value than the symbolism that Palahniuk had. A more significant change is the movie is less violent than the book. Project Mayhem was changed to be less evil. In the book, the narrator says, “Tyler didn’t care if anyone got hurt or not.
The goal was to teach each man in the project that he had the power to control history.” In the movie Tyler made sure that the buildings were empty and no one would get hurt. Tyler says in the movie, “We’re not killing anyone, man, we’re setting them free.” The book has the narrators boss at the car company killed Patrick Madden who is investigating the group killed. The movie just has the narrator threaten his boss so he could work from home and the boss is never hurt. The members of Project Mayhem never killed Patrick Madden in the movie. They just threaten to cut off Patrick’s genitals if he continued to investigate them. The killing was tone down a bit because it would probably not fly to well with the audience and since the audience is the king it was cut out.
The most drastic difference is the ending. In the book, the narrator, Marla, and some members of the fight club are on the roof. The bomb on the building they were on never went off. As the police closes in, the narrator shoots himself and he ends up in Heaven. The rest of Project Mayhem’s cronies are there too. In the movie, nobody dies at the end, except Tyler.
The Essay on Jurassic Park The Movie Vs The Book
Jurassic Park: The Book and The Movie The story of Jurassic Park was written about fourteen years ago by a man named Michael Crichton. His book has now evolved into three movies of Jurassic Park I, II, and III. Steven Speilberg has taken the story of Crichton is transformed it into one of his action packed, suspense thrillers. The first main theme that makes the story of Jurassic Park is its ...
The narrator just shoots himself in the mouth. The bullet exits through his neck and Tyler dies. The narrator and Marla hold hands as all the building in the background blow up and the movie ends. I guess Fincher changed the ending because he wanted a happier ending so he would be able to please the audience. However, the ending is darker because in the book the buildings never blow up. It is only a happier ending for the narrator and Marla..
