When Bill Clinton and the Democrats stormed to power in 1992, their anthem was the 1970s rock ditty “Don’t Stop Thinking About Tomorrow.” In the aftermath of their crushing defeat in November, Democrats today are humming a different tune, that of the 1960s surf classic Wipeout. And you have to go back even further than that–to 1952, to be exact–to truly understand the magnitude of the catastrophe that befell the Democrats. That was the last time Republicans, sporting big grins and “I like Ike” buttons, won the House and Senate.
When the 104th Congress began it’s rule, the Republican party became king of the Hill, thanks to angry voters who turned the election into a search-and-destroy mission. The GOP easily won the Senate and seized control of the House by grabbing a mind-boggling 52 seats. After two years of watching him struggle, voters bellowed “Time’s up,” opting for a divided government.
The ascendant Republicans and their Sunbelt Democratic allies can now supplant Clinton-style activism with their conservative agenda–a hard-edged vision of limited government. “We will not only be able to kill bad legislation, we’ll be able to dictate the flow of legislation,” crowed Representative William Paxon, now chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee. At the time Clinton had to come to terms with sharing power with some of his least favorite people: Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole and Speaker Newt Gingrich.
Compare/Contrast essay on Republicans and Democrats
Anti-slavery individuals who believed that the government should grant western lands to settlers free of charge founded the Republican Party in the 1850’s. The first official meeting was held on July 6, 1854 in Jackson, Michigan. The republicans became a national party in 1856. Abraham Lincoln was the first republican president. A few credits to the republican party include: the signing of ...
Many top executives (an overwhelming 85% according to a Newsweek magazine pole, Nov. 1993) rated Clinton’s performance as fair to poor. The genetic code of the Republican party is to create an environment that is more conducive to business.
For Republicans, the immediate goal now is to hold their position as the majority in both houses of congress and win control of the White House. They want to cut taxes, restrain spending, and be more innovative in delivering services to the people. they have uncorked dramatic initiatives, among them a call for a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, a new attack on deficit spending, and tax relief for the middle class. They want to slash welfare rolls, stiffen criminal penalties, and limit lawmakers’ terms and perks. And they’ll promote new regulatory relief for business.
Chopping away with machetes is just what the Armies of the Right have had to do. With Clinton occupying the White House, vetoes thwart many GOP thrusts. To complicate matters, clicks among the conservatives disagree on elements of policy and how it should be carried out themselves.
During the campaign, some moderate big-city mayors broke GOP ranks to back Democrats they felt had a better approach to urban woes. Other party members have concerns, such as aid to cut illegal immigration and money to build bigger better prisons. The radicals of the right, led by evangelist Pat Robertson, played a big role in the 1994 election. His followers wanted more attention paid to issues such as federal aid to religious academies and restrictions on abortion. Some Republicans, reflecting the views of “America First” crusader Pat Buchanan and independent Ross Perot, are skeptical of multilateral trade pacts. GOP moderates (the few left) worry that the party may abandon its emphasis on deficit-fighting. And conservative Sunbelt Democrats are uneasy about the ideals of Gingrich and friends. Neither faction trusts the other. If all hangs together, the new conservative axis of Republicans on the hill and in the house can exert an ideological hammerlock on the ways of Clinton and ensure that any legislation that moves reflects the views of the right. Until or unless the Republicans are unable to regain control of the Presidency, they will continue to try to reach agreements on a few issues, such as welfare and trade. If Democrats and Republicans can forge a consensus on these topics, they might be able to work toward other right winged goals.
The Essay on Impact of tax cut policy on public debt
Public debt is also known as government debt. It involves the total amount of money that is owned by any government at a particular time as the government engages in deficit spending. Tax cut can be achieved through different ways. First, the government can cut its expenditure as the individuals increase theirs on commodities that are sourced from within, the government can maintain its ...
Everything in between–including bills to rewrite the Superfund cleanup law, reform product liability, and speed telecommunications deregulation–could become casualties of increasing acrimony as the two parties position for battle in the up-incoming battle of ’96. The GOP game is to make Clinton look ineffectual. They have vetoed one bill after another, making his opponents out to be crazies. There was at one time a faint hope that Clinton and the Right can come to terms. But as the election day comes closer, the name calling will become more fierce. The one hope for the President is that there is still going to be pressure on Republicans to share responsibility for the governing of the past few years.
The Fiscal policy is a system that was developed to serve the national economic goals. It is the use of certain changes in the level of taxes and expenditures to serve these goals. In other words, the policy allows the government to fluctuate our tax spending in order to agree with the economy. For instance, if the government feels like raising our taxes to account for other expenditures, than they have the power to do so. The republican standpoint on the issue clearly is that our government should not have this power. They should set taxes at a fixed price.
This policy, along with Flat tax could mean that the upper-class citizens would pay more taxes than the lower class citizens. Obviously, this doesn’t sound fair. Why should the wealthier be punished for having a higher income. No, it isn’t fair that the lower class have to supply a tax when they don’t have much money to spent, but if we are all going to live in the U.S. and be U.S. citizens than we should all pitch in equally or not pitch in at all.
In conclusion, the Fiscal policy, as the GOP views it, is simply a system in which society sees how our money should be spent. If we set fixed taxation standards, it would eliminate many problems in the U.S.
In hopes of looking like he is trying to assimilate to the ways of the people on the hill, Clinton pledged that, with the fiasco of health reform behind him, he would reposition himself as and push the implementation a new crime bill, executive orders to shake up the bureaucracy, and foreign policy. Thus far we have seen little work towards these goals or at least little in the field of cooperative governing.
The Essay on Social Policy System Money Couple
Destined to Fail Chapter twelve of Charles Murray's book Loosing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950-1980 is entitled Incentives to Fail I: Maximizing Short-Term Gains. I believe that this title is very fitting and aims directly at the center of an issue of American policy, which has been characterized by many, both Democrats and Republicans as a failure. The social policy that was discussed is ...
Under the GOP compact, Americans would be weaned from handouts and pushed to self-reliance. The welfare state would be replaced with an opportunity society based on the idea that nothing is guaranteed “save the chance to prosper.” GOP pledges to balance the budget and rewrite the tax code will force it to strike corporate and middle-class entitlements in future years. The GOP reformers would still try to eliminate entitlements, which they see as morally bankrupt. Already, GOP reformers are on the way to giving states responsibility for welfare, food, stamps, and medical care for the poor. The final GOP target will most possibly be social security. The idea of privatizing the faltering system, or the possibility of steering Americans off the federal pension system by shifting a portion of payroll taxes into private investments. The bottom line is that the up coming election, decision ’96, will be the factor that may allow all these dreams to come true or possibly kill all hope.
