foreign policy relates to international matters such as participation in NATO, international trade agreements, and maintaining peaceful relations with the Soviet Union and other nations. It is the principle and activities that constitute the role of the United States in relation to the rest of the world. National security is the primary goal of foreign policy. It also holds the security of United States citizens and properties abroad. With foreign policy the United States tries to maintain international stability. Also with foreign policy we are able to help other country’s with economic assistance.
The United States is able to provide many needy country’s with food, supplies, and money. In fact, since World War II the United States has been able to provide over a hundred nations with three hundred billion dollars. The president is kind of like the head of foreign policy. He is the commander in cheif, he also heads the sea, land, and air forces of the united States. He is head of American foreign policy through the powers granted by the Constitution or acquired through tradition. He is chief diplomat and head of state, and being that he is able to represent the United States at hime and abroad.
He can initiate treaties and agreements with foreign leaders. There are also many people and agencies that help the president with some of his decisions regarding foreign policy. The president does not do it all by himself. Foreign policy affects the people, The decisions on foreign policy are very complex. Foreign policy has an effect on international relations and on national security. We Americans are a blessed people in a blessed land. We exist in a time of unprecedented prosperity.
The Term Paper on Foreign Policy Analysis : Compare and Contrast Nigeria’s Relationship with the U.S.A.
... Concepts in International Relations. Ile-Ife: University Press. Aluko, O, (ed) (1977). The foreign policy of African states. London: Hodder ... fund her development plans. NIGERIA UNITED STATES’ RELATIONS (1960-1966) For centuries, United States foreign policy has been outwardly characterized by ... Nigerian Head of Government was accorded the rare honour of addressing a joint session of the United States ...
Our farms feed ourselves and much of the world. The devastation of war has not touched our soil in 140 years. Millions every year risk their lives, in ways legal and illegal, to become part of the on-going experiment called the United States of America. Many die in the attempt; a few arrive with malice, and wreak havoc far disproportionate to their numbers before they are inevitably brought to ground; but most come with a hope and ambition that transcends color and language, and contribute to that constant national re-invention and re-invigoration that makes us so unique. At the end of one century and the beginning of another, we seem (at least from a distance) for all appearances as the Golden Land of immigrant lore, the shining city upon the hill, the embodiment of Lincoln’s “Best, Last Hope of Mankind” (Second Annual Message to Congress, 1 December 1862).
We Americans pride ourselves on having a big country.
We love to Think Big. We admire those of our leaders that possess and demonstrate this ability. There’s a reason why we call our Chief Executive the President, and not the CEO; despite our mistrust of centralized government, we expect the occupant of the White House to understand and harness the broad forces of history that affect our standing and leadership in the world. We have always wanted leaders who harness the whirlwind of events and tame it to our national advantage. The United States has had little patience for leaders who react passively to foreign events. Despite our traditional and recurring isolationism, the leaders are those who have looked outward, not inward, have stressed our interdependence upon events beyond our shores and within our society.
In conclusion, The United States needs to challenge those developing alliances now and for so long as we choose to remain the global super-eminence we have become. We need to challenge our lesser rivals aggressively, assertively and continuously, on each and every front. We need to enter re-invigorated into what Rudyard Kipling called the “Great Game” of international power. We need to speak the unspoken truth of our era; that we are, imperfect and developing as we may be, the only practical model of the just state worth pursuing in the world today and for the future. We need to fracture these developing adversarial alliances before they come to fruition, by playing off the interests and fears of each and every potential opponent using our power and ideology..
The Essay on Health and Social Care Level 3 Extended Diploma Unit 1 Developing Effective Communication in Health and Social Care Task 2
In this assignment, I will be explaining different theories including Argyle’s stages of communication and Tuckman’s stages of group interaction. Communication is the act of transferring information from one place to another. Different types of communication include spoken/verbal communication (face-to-face, telephone, television), non-verbal communication (body language, gestures) and written ...
