A Victory For Clinton Another four years, another new president? The election of 1996 for president moves closer everyday as the republican Robert Dole, and the president Bill Clinton fight it out. Far behind and by all means out of the race is Ross Perot. The polls show Dole-Kemp behind Clinton-Gore, and the results will stay this way for several key reasons. Clinton will serve another four years as president since Americans know what to expect from him as president. On several key issues, such as the budget, Dole has provided the voters with vague ideas on how he will tackle his promises.
As three key issues are examined we find Do leto make claims that can easily be doubted. Clinton’s claims and views are backed up with four years of experience. Clinton’s four years as president has seen a stable economy, and he will try to keep this up for another four years. The balancing of the budget proves to stand as one of the largest issues going into the election.
Dole has talked about putting up 23% of federal spending up for cuts. Dole has also said he will not touch the areas of social security, defense, interest on the debt, Medicare, Medicaid, veterans benefits, military pensions, and the Energy Department research labs with cuts. This means under Dole we would be likely to see cuts in national parks with the number of rangers, the Border Patrol with fewer agents, the Bureau of Prisons with fewer prison spaces, NASA with fewer space shuttle flights, the FBI with fewer agents, drug interdiction with 2, 960 fewer DEA agents, and education with fewer students in Head Start. On the record Dole has suggested cuts in the Energy Department, and the possibility of also eliminating the Commerce Department.
The Essay on President Clinton
President Clinton recently visited Mexico. While there, he met with PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party) president Ernesto Zedillo. The PRI is the political party in power. It has been in power for over 60 years and has never lost a presidential election. Is the PRI the true expression of the democratic will of the people of Mexico, or a totalitarian dictatorship? In 1968 Mexican students ...
These cuts alone would not achieve the goal of eliminating the budget deficit by 2002 which shows why Dole’s ideas are too vague. In the reality for a balanced budget Transportation and the FBI could face cuts of up to 40%. Clinton, on the other hand, focuses his cuts on other areas in order to meet the seven years standard on balancing the budget. Clinton would plan to make the majority of his cuts on Medicare, Medicaid, and welfare.
Clinton has already started dipping into these areas by passing the welfare reform act. The president’s ideas are more focused on these specifics of balancing the budget which is why he will most likely be re-elected. Another decisive area in the 1996 elections exists in the area of taxes. Taxes, always a big issue to voters, will be another key to winning the 1996 presidential election. Dole has said that he will focus his policies on a platform of sweeping tax cuts. Dole talks of a 15% across the board tax rate cut, and an end to the Internal Revenue Service as it is know today.
Dole claims that tax cuts are the key to faster growth. Dole also believes that he can cut taxes significantly and still execute his balanced budget plan. Clinton plan proves to be more acceptable. In the 1980’s tax cuts resulted in massive deficits. The growth argument Dole makes would most likely be proven false as the tax cuts in correspondence with the budget deal would just balloon the deficit.
A majority of Americans realize this from past experiences, and will tend to lean toward the President whose focuses are more targeted. Clinton’s plans call for a targeted capital gains tax cut for the middle-income families who sell their homes, a $1, 500 a year tuition tax credit for the first two years of college, expanded tax free Individual Retirement Accounts, and a credit to businesses that hire people off welfare. Voters will chose Clinton again for his less drastic and more sensible tax cuts. Along with the budget and tax cuts the issue of abortion completes the three most decisive factors in a win for President Clinton. Bill Clinton’s views on abortion were made clear when he vetoed a measure to ban partial birth or late-term abortions. Clinton said he vetoed the measure because it did not include exemptions for women who face serious health consequences if they carried the fetus to term.
The Term Paper on Californians And Failing To Raise Tax State Budget Schwarzenegger
California's Republican governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, outlined a budget proposal January 9 that constitutes a massive assault on health, education and other social service programs upon which millions of people in the state rely. The $99 billion budget is aimed at eliminating a $14. 3 billion gap between expected tax revenues and expenditures. It will include $4. 6 billion in cuts, $1 billion ...
Clinton made his claim that this was a life saving measure for a small, but vulnerable group of women and families in this country. While Clinton’s views are more for the women carrying the baby themselves, Mr. Dole tends to belong more to the pro-life side. Dole’s views are between the GOP’s opposing factions. He is not completely for the rights of the unborn like Pat Buchanan, nor pro-choice like many other Republicans. For this reason Dole is likely to lose a number of votes from the female population.
As Clinton made his views clear, he also supports government aid for the less advantaged to help the women pay for this procedure. Once again American’s will side with Bill Clinton because he has the experience, and is focused in the issues. Come next year Bill Clinton will serve another four years as president.
