THE BODY AND SOUL OF FRA LIPPO LIPPI Robert Browning’s 19 th-century poem entitled “Fra Lippo Lippi” centers thematically around the discussion of art. Fra Lippo Lippi is a 15 th-century monk and artist whom engages in a dramatic monologue with the law. As an unreliable narrator, he reveals things about himself and those around him that perhaps he is unaware of revealing. Fra Lippo Lippi expects that his behavior is seen as wrong but dismisses it with his poetic narrative of how life has tried to shape his art, imprisoning his God-given eye. As the verse unfolds the silent audience is acquainted with the aesthetic theories of the Prior and of Fra Lippo Lippi. Fra Lippo Lippi states the artist can capture what the normal eye would not as he frames reality; the gaze of art can serve the soul in reaching a more righteous being.
The role of the artist and of his art are in battle with the body and soul as seen through the struggles of the Prior and Fra Lippo Lippi’s opposing aesthetic theories. The poem begins as Fra Lippo Lippi is being arrested for breaking curfew with prostitutes in his pious company. He declares in his capture that he is guilty of the crime but through no fault of his own. “Zoos, what’s to blame? You think you see a monk! What, ‘t is past midnight, and you go the rounds, And here you catch me at the alley’s end Where supportive ladies leave their doors ajar?” (Browning, lines 3-6) As a man of the cloth, Fra Lippo Lippi took vows of abstinence and to follow God’s absolute order. As a man he has physical urges and is not expected to reach perfection. Fra Lippo Lippi recognizes each position as he spends the rest of his monologue explaining his choices.
The Essay on Comparing a painting by Fra Filippo Lippi and Dante Gabriel Rossetti
The two pictures are Rosettis Ecce Ancilla Domini and Lippis Annunciation. Both of the artists were influenced by their age. Lippi lived in Italy between 1406 and 1469 and Rosetti from 1828 to 1882. Lippis background of Italian Renaissance determined his style to a large extent. In Florence where Lippi lived the economic changes of the time led to an emerging new class: that of the banker ...
Fra Lippo Lippi grew up on the streets minus his deceased parents, with no home or food. His occupation became “Watching folk’s faces to know who will fling The bit of half-stripped grape-bunch he desires, And who will curse or kick him for his pains — ” (lines 114-116).
At the ripe age of eight he finds himself in the good company of the church as monks take him in as a brother. Fra Lippo Lippi fails at learning the language of the church but shows off his young talent of art. Instead of dismissing this as the graffiti of a child, the Prior sees fame. “What if at last we got our man of parts, We Carmelites, like those CamaldoleseAnd Preaching Friars, to do our church up fine And put the front on it that ought to be!” (lines 138-141) The relationship of Fra Lippo Lippi and the Prior becomes an exchange of the body for the soul.
Fra Lippo Lippi will give his soul to God in order to paint the body but the Prior will only allow his body to work as an instrument to paint the soul. Fra Lippo Lippi begins to draw monks and church folk in their true and real form of being black, fat, gossips and criminals. At the Priors’ first sight of such realism on canvas, the conflict of the artist and art begins as Fra Lippo Lippi’s aesthetic theories do not match his own. The Prior’s complaint about Fra Lippo Lippi’s art is that he does not draw the man’s soul; only drawing the body parts is not useful as it promotes entertainment and not prayer. “Your business is not to catch men with show, With homage to the perishable clay, But lift them over it, ignore it all, Make them forget there’s such a thing as flesh. Your business is to paint the souls of men — ” (lines 179-183) His aesthetic theory is that of religion and lifting the soul up over the body.
The Prior views Fra Lippo Lippi’s painting as the “devil’s-game” (line 178) because of the reality it exposes of the church. “Oh, that white smallish female with the breasts, She’s just my niece… .” (lines 195-196).
The Essay on Pythagorasheraclitus On Death And The Soul
One of the most interesting topics discussed by early philosophers is mortality and what happens to the human soul after death. Of the pre-Socratic philosophers, Pythagoras and Heraclitus are the two noteworthy philosophic thinkers on this subject. This paper will discuss the views of both Pythagoras and Heraclitus in regards to death and the soul and how their thoughts are similar and differ. For ...
The ‘niece’ is really the Prior’s mistress and along with other true to life figures he captures from the church, Fra Lippo Lippi paints a sinful portrait of real life.
How to draw the soul without the body is what the Prior wants, and he tries to explain to Fra Lippo Lippi what exactly the soul is. “Man’s soul, and it’s a fire, smoke… no, it’s not… It’s vapour done up like a new-born babe-” (lines 184-185).
This shows a contradiction in the Prior’s theory because fire, vapor, and body are worldly and of the flesh — things he says the soul are not. Representation is a problem because an artist draws what he’s seen or has experienced.
The Prior has not seen the soul represented, so he can not explain it to Fra Lippo Lippi, who, in turn, has not represented the soul in a way that fits the Prior’s expectations. Fra Lippo Lippi believes that he has painted the soul because the soul shines through each person, and it is his [the artist’s] job to see it and capture it. God’s spirit infuses every object no matter what the artist paints; there is nothing that isn’t beautiful because all of God’s creations are beautiful. “First when we see them painted, things we have passed Perhaps a hundred times nor cared to see; And so they are better, painted-better to us, Which is the same thing. Art was given for that; God uses us to help each other so, Lending our minds out. Have you noticed, now, Your cu llion’s hanging face? A bit of chalk, And trust me but you should, though! How much more, If I drew higher things with the same truth! That were to take the Prior’s pulpit-place, Interpret God to all of you!” (lines 301-311) Fra Lippo Lippi feels that God gives to the artist a special insight which the artist must make use of.
He explains that the average person does not see the beauty of everyday things until he / she sees it as a painting. God himself has given this talent to only a few, the artists, whose duty it is to fulfill God’s wishes to paint. Fra Lippo Lippi’s aesthetic theory is that because God is found in everything he must paint everything-including ordinary objects and everyday life that the Prior views as ungodly. As an artist, Fra Lippo Lippi admits that he also is given the rights to put more qualities into what he paints, some how playing the role of God. It was no accident that he ran into the law as he has broken curfew before but this time wanted to stop and share his story.
The Essay on On the Soul:Plato, Aristotle, Augustine
Psyche’ or the soul, is a intricate part of our being which many great thinkers such as Plato, Aristotle and Augustine aim to define and unravel. One should remain attentive to the fact that these great minds come to similar yet altered conclusions of the soul; for it is an intrinsic part of our being, aiding in our discovery and understanding of the world. Plato addresses in his novel, The ...
Fra Lippo Lippi wanted someone, anyone, to hear why he is who he is and why he does the things he does. He needs his audience to know that being a monk was not solely by his own choice — he was a starving child and the monks offered him food in return to swearing off the girls. His paintings were not welcomed with open arms by the church because of the suggested ‘evil’ that Fra Lippo Lippi did not feel he was representing. The Prior’s niece and the fat monks are what the artist sees for himself, by God’s given talent, and so me must paint them. Fra Lippo Lippi has connected society with religion and as an artist he has a duty to make shown for the average person will not see it until they see it as art. Art is based on life and life is based on art but not until you see something represented which is what Fra Lippo Lippi is trying to do.
In the end of his dramatic monologue Fra Lippo Lippi hints to the next painting he will create in six months which he urges his audience to go and view. He will paint the painting the Prior wants to see, one of the soul and spirit in company of God, Madonna, Saints and an unexpected guest. Fra Lippo Lippi will also be in the holy crowd, “moonstruck” (line 364) and ready to shrink back. The artist competes with God as he creates his art and now he is in the company of God who created him.
In an instant Fra Lippo Lippi redeems his aesthetic theory and has confidence that he should be there with the celestial crowd because he is the only one who can paint. “Could Saint John there draw-“His camel-hair make up a up a painting-brush? “We come to brother Lippo for all that, “Iste perfect opus!” So, all smile — ” (lines 374-377) This is the painting that will settle the battle between the Prior and Fra Lippo Lippi’s difference of opinion on the role of the artist and of art. The Prior will be happy to see the soul and Fra Lippo will be happy to be present in the painting; the body and soul together.
The Essay on Written Art Discussion Painting Hand Artists
Today, artists from diverse cultures communicate their artistic ideas in a global context, while still retaining links to the artistic traditions of their own culture. This multicultural development is due to the rapid advances in technology, communication, and travel, making possible the shared interest from different cultures in multicultural works of art. Artists such as Alan Tucker, who draws ...
