The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave is an account of Frederick Douglass’ life written in a very detached and objective tone. You might find this tone normal for a historical account of the events of someone’s life if not for the fact that the narrative was written by Frederick Douglass himself. In light of the fact that Douglass wrote his autobiography as a treatise in support of the abolishment of slavery, the removed tone was an effective tone. It gave force to his argument that slavery should be done away with. Considering the fact that this was written during the height of the abolition movement the novel had to be effective in order to advance the success of the movement. The distant tone was effective because if Douglass had written with an impassioned tone readers would have noticed it and simply wrote it off as a biased work, unable to see the issued from both sides.
Here Douglass shows that slavery was not a constant source of pain and suffering: “I was not old enough to work in the fields, and there being little else than field work to do, I had a great deal of leisure time,” (Douglass 71. ) This is effective in proving his point because it allows him to show the true horrors of slavery and not be lopsided in his views. Weber 2 Having an objective also paved the way for Douglass to show the most gruesome and torrid tales of slave life. Here is where the autobiographical form of the exposition comes in hand, enabling him to go into the closest of detail of his own experiences as a slave: “I had been at my new home but one week before Mr. Covey gave me a very severe whipping, cutting my back, causing the blood to run, and raising ridges on my flesh as large as my little finger,” (Douglass 101. ) Notice how all he does is detail the incident.
The Essay on Describe Northups Life Before Slavery Explain How He Became A
Describe Northups life before slavery. Explain how he became a slave, and how he finally escaped Early life. Solomon was born in New York in 1808. His father was a former slave who had been freed by his master in his will. Somehow his father Mistus managed to make sure that his children received an education that was better than the usual for Americans of African descent including learning to play ...
He doesn’t speak of how this made him feel or what he wanted to do in response. This neutrality removes him from the picture and lets the sequence of events speak as loudly as they do for themselves. Granted the tone changes throughout the book but the overwhelming and most effective tone was that of objectivity. Showing both sides gives him the opportunity to say that his work was not partial to abolishment. The in depth description of the whipping was compelling while the notation of a fair amount of leisure time as a child balances the scales but doesn’t sway the argument in favor of slavery in any way. The objectivity was effective because it gave more validity to his argument.
Every slave said what Frederick Douglass said but they we not able to extract themselves from their own experiences as well as Douglass did. This took away from their statement’s ability to sway the way people thought at the time. Thus this is the reason why Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave has gone down as the principal literary thesis for the abolishment of slavery.
