The film ?Danton? takes a look at the end of the French Revolution. To me, many of the scenes seemed to be saying that the Revolution itself was hypocritical. There are numerous examples in the film where leading figures of the Revolution were taking action that was similar to what they had originally rebelled. An example of this would be Danton?s trial and how it was rigged to get a guilty verdict. At the trial, there were strict rules and regulations. The accused could not speak to the public or to their accusers. Reporters could not take notes and tell the public what was happening. It seemed to me when I was watching the film that the Committee was trying to control everything that was going on. They didn?t care about the truth or whether Danton was guilty or not, they only wanted any possible form of resistance to be crushed. The way they imposed those restrictions reminded me of an absolute king trying to crush revolutionaries. The makers of the film were pointing out here how the Revolution was hypocritical in its policies. When Robespierre ordered Danton?s arrest, he was saying in no uncertain terms that it doesn?t matter what the people want, just what those in charge want.
Another example is the opening scene, when the child was being bathed. He was quizzed on the Declaration of the rights of Man and Citizen. Every time he misquoted the document, he was slapped. This is an extraordinary point that the filmmaker is making on the Revolution and it?s effects. The child is being oppressed from birth with the ideas of change that were supposed to free people from oppression. The ideas and beliefs of the Revolution are being thrusted on this child without him being allowed to decide for himself what beliefs he wants to follow. Also, it is showing right away that those in charge want it their way, and no other. When he got a few words wrong, or didn?t remember them at all, he got slapped. Meaning that if the people don?t agree with us, or follow us, then those in charge will retaliate. What they did to Danton is an example of that. He wanted the revolution to succeed, just not the way the Committee wanted, so they had him killed. This proves how the filmmaker believed the Revolution was hypocritical. The Committee wanted change, but they wanted it to be ongoing, where Danton wanted quick change in one shot, and for it to end. So, instead of working out the problems they were having, the more powerful Committee had Danton killed to stop him from taking over.
The Essay on The History of Chinese Film
History of Chinese Film The history of Chinese film has three separate threads of development: Cinema of Hong Kong, Cinema of China, and Cinema of Taiwan. The cinema of Mainland China after 1949 has grown up somewhat suppressed by the Communist regime until now. The Beginnings: Shanghai as the Center Motion pictures were introduced to China in 1896. The first recorded screening of a motion picture ...
It shows how the Committee acted like a king putting down a rebellion. The Committee didn?t even care that the people were ready to openly revolt against them because they loved Danton so much. Robespierre proved it when he said, ?When the republic is at stake, we can do anything.? I?m sure there was a king somewhere who said the same thing about his Monarchy. Robespierre even resembled a king when he dressed up for the portrait. The robe and scepter along with the pose made him look as much as an absolute king as you can get. That is the image of the hypocrisy of the Revolution. A movement for change turned to be the same as it was before, only with different leaders. The film says that the French Revolution wasn?t as great as people think. It was a complete turnaround from absolutism under a king, to virtual absolutism under a democracy. Danton hit the nail on the head when he said, ?like Saturn, the Revolution has devoured it?s children.?
