Fuzzy Pathetic Loving “Ass” A Midsummer Night’s Dream, by William Shakespeare, is a classic play that has been retold in many ways. The most recent version of this romantic comedy was done by Michael Hoffman in 1999. This portrayal follows very closely to the original play. Very few lines are taken out, and the characters stay very true to the assumed original idea. The one main difference in the original play and this movie is the depiction of the character Nick Bottom the weaver. The original play shows Bottom as the .”..
overconfident weaver… hilariously overt… has extraordinary belief in his own ability… totally unaware of his ridiculousness… .” (Sparknotes. com).
These types of characteristics would normally make readers see Bottom as a cocky, egotistical, center of attention, “ass.” In the play, this is the case. However, in the 1999 movie version, with Kevin Kline as Bottom, the audience gets a different idea of Bottom without changing his basic character traits. Hoffman achieved changing the overall perception of the character of Bottom from to a .”.. warm fuzzy man, a dreamer for whom we can root”, and pathetic lover, while still keeping the “ass” quality, by only changing a few small, very subtle things (Jones, 127).
The Term Paper on Underlying Theme Play Horace Character
Every play written uses dramatic elements. The main dramatic elements are plot, character, theme, and language. Lillian Hellman, who wrote the Little Foxes, incorporates these elements beautifully in her play. The play is set during the spring of 1900 and takes place in the Deep South part of the United States of America. Just as every other play, the Little Foxes has included the dramatic ...
In what would be Act I Scene II of the original play, Bottom is shown sitting alone at a caf’e. As he is making his way to leave, a rough looking woman walking around in a very hurried and determined manner become the focus of the screen.
The audience soon realizes this is Bottoms wife. Bottom seems to become frightened of her on sight, so he hides behind a wall. You also learn that his wife thinks his dreams of being an actor are simply unrealistic and stupid. The original Shakespearian play does not include a wife for Nick Bottom. The adding of a wife to a movie is not normally of great importance; however, the type of wife she is makes all the difference. Later in the scene, when Bottom goes home, the audience sees more of what type of a wife this is.
As Bottom enters his house he is shown looking around to see where she might be; he is very quite and slips into a room quickly. Almost instantly, his wife realizes he is home, and she rushes into the room with a very ugly, stern expression on her face. There is no speaking in this scene (Hoffman).
You see the entire communication line in this relationship in a five second scene; she yells and gives looks, he probably can not get a word in edge wise so he has decided to stop trying.
The audience gets the impression that, understandably, Nick does not enjoy being home for many reasons. While reading the original play version, Act IV Scene I, Bottom seems to be very demanding of Titania’s fairies. He asks for someone to scratch his chin, get him oats, and play him music (Shakespeare).
In the movie version these lines are cut out giving the audience the impression that he enjoys where he is not only because of the praise, but also he likes it because he is respected and loved. He lives with a wife that thinks he is foolish, seems to try and control him, and doesn’t give him any affection or respect. Understandably, he is happier anywhere.” Lover” was not the assumed original intent of the character Bottom.
However, in the movie, Bottom is a lover. While Titania is “in love” with Bottom in the play, Bottom is just read as feeling as if the attention and the doting were owed to him (Jones, 127).
In the movie, somewhere between what would be Act III and IV, Bottom and Titania make love. Bottom is not just seen as a lover in the physical sense. Due to the added opera background music and the longing looks into Titania’s eyes the audience is supposed to get the impression that Bottom may really feel for this fairy. Also in the movie scene from Act I Scene II, the audience feels sorry for Bottom for a different reason.
The Essay on Misery Play Stage Audience
A New Misery Matt Joseph s version of the Misery is certainly different from what one would expect. While Stephen King s Misery gave the audience a feeling of suspense caused by silence, Joseph s Misery definitely kept the audience on the edge of their seats as the characters in the play were more aggressive and show more emotions. When I first came to watch the play, I only expected to see an ...
In the play, when Quince is assigning roles for the actors, Bottom gets a very large head in thinking that he will be the best candidate for every part in the play and wants to play them all (Shakespeare).
This occurs in the movie as well, but in the movie there is an audience forming behind Bottom as he is lavishly acting out his “perfect” performances of different types of characters. Bottom seems to think the people observing are intrigued by his acting skill, however the movie audience realizes that most of them are laughing at him. Bottom is unaware of how annoyed others are getting with his large ego and continues on (Hoffman).
In play, this would be where Bottom begins to discuss what type of beard he is going to wear, still not paying attention to anyone except himself. In the movie those lines are left out.
These lines are replaced with a series of events. First, two boys, pour red wine on Bottoms white suite in the middle of one of his speeches embarrassing him in front of a small audience of passerby’s. Instead of Bottom beginning to discuss his beard like an ego driven “ass” would do, he sits and sulks for a moment while the people laugh (Hoffman).
Another subtle change that comes out of leaving those three lines out is that, in the play those lines cause Bottom to look vainer. By leaving those out it left out some of the cockiness of Nick’s character, which was then substituted for sympathy. Bottom is still equally portrayed as an ass in both the movie and the play due to the cocky attitude towards being the best at all characters.
The Essay on Macbeth – Character Changes
"This dead butcher and his fiend like queen", is the way in which Malcolm describes Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. Describe the way in which these two characters changed during the course of the play. At the beginning of the play Macbeth is seen as a courageous soldier who is loyal to the King but is corrupted from the witches prophecies and by his and Lady Macbeth's ambition. This is because of the ...
Nick Bottom is a cocky, “ass” of a guy in anyway you look at it. Even though Hoffman changed the overall idea of Bottom from constant ass to deep down softy, the core of the character stayed the same. Hoffman used only subtle changes, to stay true to the Shakespeare at heart, yet still put a creative change in the age old play. This version of Bottom made the character seem even more human with the different, yet real, layers of personality. Works Cited Jones, Nicholas. “Bottom’s Wife: Gender and Voice in Hoffman’s Dream.” Literature/Film Quarterly v.
32 no. 2 (2004): 126-33. Spark Notes. 26 August 2005… William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Dir.
Michael Hoffman. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Regency Enterprises. 1999. DVD..
