Great men are either born great, or achieve greatness. And sometimes it is thrust upon some of them. Where does Gandhi stand in this Shakespearean classification? Certainly Gandhi achieved greatness. But I do not want to lift Gandhi to the level of a deity, nor do I want to use such an expression as Gandhism. That would amount to doing grave injustice to him. Because Gandhi denied that he had established a sect. To quote him, “I have no desire to establish a sect. I am really too ambitious to be satisfied with a sect for following for I represent no new truths. I endeavour to follow and represent truth as I know it. I do claim to throw new light on many an old truth.”
Gandhi brought to the notice of all the sad predicament of the wretchedness of the so-called modern civilisation characterised by the outward progress but inward backwardness. It may seem to be a paradox but there is poverty in affluence. And that poverty in affluence only the sharp insight of Gandhi could clearly discern.
Now, when the whole world is passing through a traumatic period due to the surfeit of material progress, when man’s wisdom is lost in knowledge, when man’s knowledge is lost in information, when man’s life is lost in living, when the
atman
is deep asleep like the proverbial
‘Kumbhakarna’
and
bhoga
has become the quintessence of man’s only goal in life, when we are farther from God and spiritualism and nearer to our ‘
D-Day
The Essay on Gandhi British Truth God
Gandhi In the twentieth century Gandhi stimulated fresh expressions of Hinduism in independent India. Gandhi was a Hindu leader who was against the British government, served time in British jails, and in 1947 became one of the leaders of a new India where Hinduism is still the dominant religion. Gandhi studied in Britain and practiced law in South Africa. He was keenly aware of the injustices ...
’, is it irrelevant to look back with gratitude to the teachings of Gandhi, of whom even the great apostle of science, Einstein, said: “………….. generations to come would scarcely believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth”? If the present generation happens to take a re-birth after a few centuries, they will find Gandhi in myth. Our eyes are so myopic, our thoughts so jaundiced that we can neither expect noble deeds, noble thoughts and noble men nor appreciate these.
The shape and form, the shade and colour, the quintessence of Gandhi’s moral and political thought were provided by what he himself called, in Hind Swaraj (1909), a severe condem-nation of modern civilisation. Hind Swaraj focused on his ideas of modern civilisation which are more relevant today than these were in 1909. It is a masterpiece. Even Tolstoy recorded in his Diary on April 20, 1910: “Read Gandhi about civilisation, wonderful.” One will be surprised to learn that Gandhi wrote this classic at the age of 25 only, thus, truly symbolising Disraeli’s view that everything that is great is made by the youth.
Gandhi brought to the notice of all something which we all know but seldom realise: that despite its dazzling artistic brilliance and fabulous intellec-tual vitality, its material attractions and madly feverish activity, modern civilisation is a hind-rance rather than a help to the needs of the human soul and the craving for a better life. And how true he is today than he was in his own time. Today we pretend to have everything before us, but we have nothing before us except fear. Today we pretend to live in the best of times, but in reality we live in the worst of times. Today we pretend to see the spring of hope all around us, but we are surrounded by the clouds of the winter of despair. Science has made everything too easy. Both birth and death! We can just push the button and remaining far away from our enemy, destroy him in the twinkle of an eye. This is the achievement of the
“pushbutton”
civilisation. Thus Gandhi had a tremendous foresight to suggest that a grim tragedy lies hidden behind all the tinsel splendour of modern civilisation, that the ceaseless rush for mere living leaves no time for contemplation, for self-introspection, that the marvels of science, the claims of civilisation and the gospel of progress offer neither stability nor certainty, nothing subs-tantial to struggling humanity.
The Essay on Ancient Greek Modern Today Thought
Modern Western though has been shaped by emphasis on scientific thinking and reasoning from the time of Copernicus, Galileo and Newton. The scientific revolution gave birth to a new era of thought, in which observations were made to support an idea. This involved what man could prove through sense, not religion or superstition. Notable ancient Greek historians, philosophers and scientists, such as ...
Gandhi and Rousseau
In his condemnation of modern civilisation Gandhi appears to be very close to Rousseau’s ideas. At the age of 37, Rousseau participated in an essay competition organised by the Academy of Dijon. The topic of the essay was: “Has progress in science and arts corrupted or purified mankind?” Rousseau wrote that it had corrupted mankind. Gandhi too believed that modern civilisation had corrupted mankind. And how relevant his ideas are today! Each moment of every day we risk the imminent destruction of life in this world! Man, because of the tremendous expansion in science, has made a successful expedition to moon, and at the same time is thinking of taking shelter there and destroy the earth. Science—the embodiment of modern civilisation—is like the Frankenstein monster that is very likely to destroy its own creator. A shocking and horrible predicament of modern civilisation.
It was not just the moral inadequacy and extravagant pretensions of modern civilisation, but its treacherously deceptive, hypnotic and self-destructive tendency that was the theme of Hind Swaraj. Gandhi was firmly of the view that modern civilisation has the seductive colour of a consumptive person who clings to life but is doomed to die. This analogy brings Gandhi very close to Tawney’s image of a hypochondriac who is so absorbed in the process of his digestion that he goes to his grave before he has begun to live.
Gandhi’s Own Model of
Modern Civilisation
Like Karl Marx, Gandhi professed the doom of modern civilisation. Yet his view of humanity and history was fundamentally optimistic owing to the certainty of his personally tested but unprovable faith. Even Hind Swaraj conceded “civilisation is not an incurable disease”; that people are not bad at heart and their mode of thought is not inherently immoral. Civilisation stands self-condemned but it is possible for courageous and compassionate men to take up a massive programme of action.
If Gandhi condemned what he called the pseudo-civilisation of the capitalist and comm-unist systems of industrialisation, what was then his own concept of civilisation? In his thought, civilisation is that mode of conduct which points to the path of duty. This may seem to be odd to us because all of us claim to be civilised without performing our duty. Gandhi quite candidly said: “Performance of duty and observance of morality are convertible terms. To observe morality is to attain mastery over our mind and our passions. So doing, we know ourselves.” This may seem an unusual definition of civilisation, but Mirabeu, who was the first person in the world to employ the word, civilisation, similarly gave a moral criterion: “……………. Civilisation does nothing for society unless it is able to give form and substance to virtue.”
The Research paper on Indira Gandhi Vs. Raj Narain And Its Relation With Jeremy Bentham's Sovereignty
Case Study : Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Shri Raj Narain And Anr. on 7 November, 1975 On 23September, 2013 Jeremy Bentham was among the first few philosophers to advocated equal status to both men and women. This quality was recognised in Plato’s republic, but after Plato’s republic it was discontinued for over 2,000 years. In his philosophy Bentham considered sovereign as someone with unlimited ...
