I chose this article in the New York Times because it is a moral issue which is stirring up controversy in religion and media. In the rapid change of social norms in todays world, we are given a topic that mixes both the new generation of people and the old traditional way of living. My evaluation of this subject has left me in an interesting situation; and caught between moral or social customs. Rachel Zole wrote this editorial in the NY Times and in doing so helped voice out Rev. Fred Daleys belief who was one of the first priests to expose his sexual orientation. What the author is trying to do is help people understand the situation plus persuade the reader to understand and side with the Reverend. The crisis that is taking place in the church is, because homosexuality is not morally accepted, the Vatican is passing a set of rules which forbids any known gay persons to enter the church and also back up the teaching with documents that can set new restrictions on candidates entering priesthood (12-13).
The document excludes most gay men from the priesthood, banning in strong and specific language candidates who are actively homosexual, have homosexual tendencies or support the so-called ‘gay culture. The document appears to make exceptions only to allow priesthood for candidates who experienced transitory homosexual tendencies that were clearly overcome at least three years before ordination as a deacon, the last step before priesthood. There are an estimated 2,300 priests and clergymen that are participating in the church who considers them to be morally unstable. The document draws a clear line in banning active homosexuals and what many experts said is a less clear line in also banning candidates for the priesthood. As a conservative and a church person, I am against a priest who has any sort of known homosexuality in his background to be even considered a candidate. The church is one of the last places left in the world that is free of violence and persecution and shouldnt be corrupted with and priest who thinks he might have a different sexual preference.
The Term Paper on Society And Of The Church Emerges From Lazarillo De Tormes
Towards the end of the 15th century, the general public was becoming increasingly literate and books more readily available due to cheap printing. Although the normal reading tendencies leaned toward history, biographies and travel books, there is a sign that an interest was emerging in a more realistic presentation of society and its problems. Not surprisingly, when Lazarillo de Tormes was ...
With the rising number of people attending church, it wouldnt be suitable for a young child to get exposed to such dishonesty and shape his/her opinion in a way contradictory to what the church believes. I disagree with the article because it is stated by a priest who says they are telling him to sit on the back of the bus. This isnt true. Religious organizations do not agree with homosexuality but they still allow priests with different sexual orientation to be able to stay in the churches as participants. However, because the new rules have passed, it raises the bar high and would be difficult to imagine gay men feeling encouraged to pursue a life in the priesthood. All in all, I wouldnt want my child to find out that our priest has different sexual focus and be wondering the legitimacy of church and the bible, which is against homosexuality.
The new rules are set for the group of clergymen and men going through the priesthood without having anything to hide, because after all, priests are the preachers of the good word..
