Gender Differences In Aggression Previous research concerning peer aggression has been conducted under the assumption that women rarely display aggression; therefore, aggressive behavior has historically been viewed as a male phenomenon (Bj”, 1994).
Recently, many researchers have challenged the gender bias in the existence of aggressive behaviors and have broadened the definition of aggression. Bj”‘s research suggests sex differences exist in the quality of the aggression, but not the quantity. According to Paquette and Underwood (1999), an adolescent’s expression of anger and contempt for peers can sometimes be expressed through physical aggression, manipulation, exclusion, and / or gossip.
This broader definition allows for a more complete understanding of the social or relational aggression, which is typically associated with females. relational aggression is more verbal than physical and very prevalent in today’s society. Gender differences in the prevalence and the form of aggressive behavior used could be explained by the different social roles of females and males. This paper will discuss the different types of aggression and how each type is used within the female and male peer groups. Aggression has been defined as having five central features: Intention to harm, unprovoked, happens repeatedly, victim perceives the bully as having power, and occurring in small groups. There are two distinct forms of aggression within this definition, overt (physical) and relational (verbal).
The Term Paper on Gender Based Difference In Managerial Styles
This report looks at several researches that have studied the managerial styles of males and females with an attempt to define perceived differences between them. In addition discussed are the results from studies on the effectiveness of managers between the two genders. The results of these studies have been analyzed through readings of several researches and personal experiences of the students ...
Crick and Grotpeter (1995) state that the distinction between overt and relational aggression is related to gender. To be specific, the types of aggressive behaviors displayed within peer groups differ between same-sex groups. It was previously assumed that girls used strictly relational aggression in contrast to boys who primarily used overt forms of aggression. Research shows that levels of overt aggression are higher in males; however, the levels of relational aggression are equal between both males and females (Bj”, Lagerspetz, & Kaukiainen, 1992).
This does not mean that females are less aggressive than males. Females and males choose their principal form of aggression in order to maximize the effects of the aggression.
The reaction of peers to overt and relational aggression differs due to the general value of the group. To generate the desired reaction, females typically choose to use relational forms of aggression because they tend to value intimate relationships. Because males tend to value influential goals such as status among peers, they will typically use overt forms of aggression and gradually incorporate relational forms (Grotpeter & Crick, 1996).
The choice of aggression could be linked to the social roles of males and females, the verbal maturity, or the social dynamics in peer relationships. The nature of girls’ relationships involves intimate conversations between friends and, as a result, girls are more invested in their social status and friendships compared to boys (Berndt, 1982).
Their choice to use relational aggression to impose social norms more often than physical aggression can be credited to the desire for adolescents to “damage what the same-gender peer group most values” (Paquette & Underwood, 1999, p.
244).
Girls view relational aggression as wounding because it harms the intimate relationships they value. Because of the high levels of intimacy in their relationships, relational aggression enables them to gain control over their friends (Grotpeter & Crick, 1996).
The Essay on Aggressive Behavior Aggression Group Stereotypes Social
Aggression is a behavioral characteristic that refers to forceful actions or procedures (such a deliberate attack) with intentions to dominate or master. It tends to be hostile, injurious, or destructive, and is often motivated by frustration (The Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 1995). For an individual, aggressive behavior is considered understandable and normal under appropriate circumstances, but ...
As a reaction, individuals who have been victims of relational aggression reported experiencing feelings of unhappiness as well as lowered self-perceptions of athletic capability, physical appearance, romantic appeal, close friendships, and general self-worth. Girls view relational aggression just as harmful as physical aggression, but tend to react more to the experience of being a victim of relational aggression than boys (Paquette & Underwood, 1999).
Regardless of tendencies, the choice of tactic is dependent on the situation.
It is not out of character for a girl to use physical aggression if under direct physical attack (Bj”, 1994).
It is apparent that girls choose their aggressive strategy according to the situation, but relational aggression is most commonly effective. In addition to social group values, a girl’s preference to use less physical aggression compared to relational aggression can be the result of development and general social expectations. Some studies have shown that boys’ tend to romanticize aggression; however, girls are expected to act more pro social and in a caring manner. Since girls are expected to play a more social role, they tend to utilize more social rather than physical forms of aggression (Baron, Byrne, & Johnson, 1998).
In most cases, girls are typically physically weaker than males. Some research suggests that girls compensate for their physical weakness by employing a more verbal aggression strategy (Bj”, 1994).
The verbal form of aggression may be easier to master for girls because of their quick verbal development. Relational aggression is dependent on both social and verbal skills.
The use of relational aggression has been shown to intensify with age so girls may learn to employ this strategy sooner, but boys eventually catch up as their verbal skills increase. Boys form social bonds through involvement in activities and spend much less time engaging in personal conversations than girls (Berndt, 1982).
The Essay on Relational Aggression Girls Girl School
... early as the age of preschoolers have developed relational aggression. All social classes are relationally aggressive. Boys are also relationally aggressive. Most of the ... a researcher at the University of Minnesota says: "Physical aggression isn't very accepted for girls, so they turn to manipulation and emotional threats ...
Crick and Grotpeter (1996) state that individuals who display overt aggression also show low levels of intimacy; they value companionship in a group over individual. Rather than enforcing social norms, boys use aggression to create a social order. It is commonly accepted and expected for boys to engage in rough-and-tumble play.
Physical forms of aggression are accepted because they agree with the norms of male behavior in our society. Physically aggressive behavior is more useful in male relationships because it is consistent with the norms of boys’ peer groups. It is apparent the choice of individual typical aggression strategies is based on the social norms of their peer groups. The difference is not determined so much by personal preference for a kind of aggression, but is chosen for the response to the kind of aggression within the peer group. Boys tend to respond more to physical aggression, even though the rates of relational aggression are the same. Girls are affected more by relational aggression.
Factors such as verbal skills, general social roles and reactions to aggression of girls and boys help to determine the usage of overt and relational aggression. References Baron, R. A. , Byrne, D. , & Johnson, B. T.
(1998).
Exploring Social Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Berndt, T. J. (1982).
The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1447-1460. Bj”, K. (1994).
Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 177-188.
Bj”, K. , Lagerspetz, K. , & Kaukiainen, A. (1992).
Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression.
Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117-127. Crick, N. R. , & Grotpeter, J. K. (1996).
Children’s treatment by peers: Victims of relational and overt aggression. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 367-380. Grotpeter, J. K.
, & Crick, N. R. (1996).
Relational aggression, overt aggression, and friendship. Child Development, 67, 2328-2338. Paquette, J.
& Underwood, M. (1999).
Gender differences in young adolescents’ experiences of peer victimization: Social and physical aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 242-265.
The Essay on Subverted 19th Century Traditional Social Mores and Norms in Dracula
Bram Stoker’s Dracula remains one of the more recognizable novels of its genre despite being published in 1897. A classic horror story which has been retold and produced over and over again since its original publication, Dracula was especially disturbing when it originally was released because of how Stoker attacks Victorian era social mores and norms throughout the entire novel. Stoker subverts ...
