George Bush’s speech alarmingly persuades his audience by expressing powerful emotional reasons for the war against terrorism. George Bush’s speech is quite similar to Paine and Henrys’s peaches, because they all cover a great deal of pathos to enhance their discussion. Bush’s speech contains rhetorical questions, like when he asked, “Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced or cast aside without consequence? Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding or will it be irrelevant?” Hence, Bush questioned his audience in order to impel them to cogitate on those issues. He exhibits them in a way that draws the intensity of his purpose of presenting reasons for the war, like Patrick did. For instance, Patrick queried, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!” Thomas Paine imposed strong, rhetorical questions as well, when he says: “What signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my country man; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? If we reason to the root of things, we shall find no difference, neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other… .” In addition, they all spoke about the threats from another country.
There is a threat of terrorism from the Iraqi regime, and Paine or Henry said there is a threat of political terrorism from the British. Furthermore, Bush, Patrick, and Thomas poses strong, negative words against their enemies, making them sound like terrible, and evil violators, or a “common murderer” as Henry puts it. This suggests an accumulation of pathos to vindicate their statements. Moreover, Bush criticized the Iraqi regime like when he alleged, “Iraq continued to commit ‘extremely grave violations’ of human rights”, like Paine criticized the British for their violation of the colonists’ civil rights. All of them speak about taking necessary actions against these violators Bush provides repetition in some parts of his speech, much like what Paine did. For example, in the beginning of Bush’s speech, he proclaimed, “We turn to the urgent duty of protecting others lives, without illusion and without fear.” Then later on, he repeats: “We can harbor no illusion.” Additionally, he commented on the brave and courageous acts that the United States must take, and to manifest fearlessness as well.
The Essay on George Bush Speech Analysis
George Bush begins the speech with a solemn address and informs the people of America about the tragic events that unfolded. The aim of this speech was to reassure the public that they are now safe and the perpetrators will be brought to justice. The use of inclusive pronouns, such as ‘we’ and ‘our’, is just one of the ways in which he builds a sense of unity and togetherness with the audience. He ...
Likewise, Paine stated, “The war is inevitable- and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come!” It is true that all their conclusions are also very similar. Bush’s stated, “we must choose between a world of fear and a world of progress. We cannot stand by and do nothing while dangers comes.” He illustrated dramatic concerns by questioning the viewers what type of “world” they prefer to live in, which leads them to the obvious choice. Plus, he declared to the audience that the war is unavoidable, that they must battle, for it is the only way to protect their liberty.
Just like when Henry asked the audience, “if a robber comes in my home and threatens me, am I to suffer it?” He generated more emotional appeal and intensity to reinforce his point. Overall, basis of their speeches all agree that as Americans we have the duty to fight when our rights are being suppressed in order to construct a better future for the nation.
