Gerard Manley Hopkins is a reflection of his time period because his work represents realism, his work was different from what was expected, and his work had to do with religion. Although Hopkins is considered as one of the great poets of the past, he was not that appreciated during his time period. The only reason that we have his work today is because his friends held on to his work after his death and decided to publish it for him in 1918. Hopkins age was defined by the change from romanticism to realism. This was a slow change but it was one that was greatly needed by Hopkins. His work was not very well liked by people because it was about things that were against the church (Bloom p.90).
During his time this was a big mistake, but in the same sense this portrayed realism to its fullest. Although some of Hopkins’ poems seem disturbing, they are actually excellent pieces of work. He portrayed realism by only writing about things that were realistic to him and his society. People did not accept Hopkins’ poetry because they did not like him; they did not accept it because it went against everything they believed in. The church was the most important thing in peoples’ lives during this era and most of Hopkins’ work were about things that went against the church and its beliefs. Even though people did not accept his poems during his time, they are very well accepted now and are considered masterpieces of his era.
Hopkins’ work was very different from what was expected. This reflects how different his era was and how much change it went through. Hopkins’ era was about change and pushing away from the norm. The reason that Hopkins’ work was not very well accepted by the people of his time was because the people were stuck only on what they knew. They did not want to believe in something that went against something that they knew. Although there was a movement from romanticism to realism, Hopkins was only one of the few poets that actually wrote about realistic things.
The Essay on Fenton Hope Work People
In today's society, a job is necessary. Many people get up every morning hating what they do, but as the working class people we have to learn to live with it. Not everything we do we will like. Fenton is a worker for Seaboard World Airlines. He's an everyday person that wakes up every morning to go to work. The difference between other people and Fenton is the fact he hates his job. I say he ...
That is what was so great about the work of Hopkins; it was not only about realistic things that were happening during his time, but it was also about realistic things that could happen in the near future from where he was. This also something that was not very accepted by the people of his time period. Thinking of things that had not already happened was something that only a witch or devil would do (Sulloway p.59).
Hopkins’ work brought a different taste into the world of poetry and everyone will be able to appreciate his work. Most of Hopkins’ work had to do with religion. Although it sounds like his work should have been praised because it dealt with religion, it was rejected because it was about things that went against the church.
For instance one of his pieces was about a group of nuns that were crossing a bridge while it was collapsing(Fairwhether p.84).
This was a very big mistake for Hopkins because this caused there to be no audience for his work. Although this work was rejected by his time, it is greatly appreciated now because there is no one great religion anymore. There are many more religions that are practiced now then there were then. This is one of the reasons that Hopkins work is appreciated now. Gerard Manley Hopkins was a man of great talent.
Although the people of his time did not agree, he was a man that produced many masterpieces in his lifetime (Bergonzi p.113).
He went through a lot throughout his life and that was why he was such a great poet. Even if people of his time did not agree with what he wrote in his poems, his name will be preserved forever as one of the greatest poets in the world. His worked changed many views of people and it also caused more people to write about things that were on their minds instead of writing only of what they knew and had already experienced. Works Cited Bergonzi, Bernard. Gerard Manley Hopkins. Macmillan: New York.
Computer Addiction People Time Internet
Have you ever thought how much time do you spend using on a computer in a day / week ? Computers are as common in numerous households around the world. People from all age groups are learning to operate computers and anyone who has worked with computers for long periods of time knows that computers can be just as addicting as drinking every night of the week. Take further, Computer addiction can ...
1977. Bloom, Harold ed. Modern Critical Reviews: Gerard Manley Hopkins. Chelsea House Publishers: New York. 1986. Fairwhether, Eugent, The Oxford Movement. Oxford University Press: London. 1964. Sulloway, Alison. Gerard Manley Hopkins and the Victorian Temper. Columbia University Press: New York.
1972Gerard Manley Hopkins is a reflection of his time period because his work represents realism, his work was different from what was expected, and his work had to do with religion. Although Hopkins is considered as one of the great poets of the past, he was not that appreciated during his time period. The only reason that we have his work today is because his friends held on to his work after his death and decided to publish it for him in 1918. Hopkins age was defined by the change from romanticism to realism. This was a slow change but it was one that was greatly needed by Hopkins. His work was not very well liked by people because it was about things that were against the church (Bloom p.90).
During his time this was a big mistake, but in the same sense this portrayed realism to its fullest. Although some of Hopkins’ poems seem disturbing, they are actually excellent pieces of work. He portrayed realism by only writing about things that were realistic to him and his society. People did not accept Hopkins’ poetry because they did not like him; they did not accept it because it went against everything they believed in. The church was the most important thing in peoples’ lives during this era and most of Hopkins’ work were about things that went against the church and its beliefs. Even though people did not accept his poems during his time, they are very well accepted now and are considered masterpieces of his era.
Hopkins’ work was very different from what was expected. This reflects how different his era was and how much change it went through. Hopkins’ era was about change and pushing away from the norm. The reason that Hopkins’ work was not very well accepted by the people of his time was because the people were stuck only on what they knew. They did not want to believe in something that went against something that they knew. Although there was a movement from romanticism to realism, Hopkins was only one of the few poets that actually wrote about realistic things.
The Essay on Sometimes It Is Very Difficult to Learn Yhe Way People Do Things in a New Culture. What Can We Do to Make Life Easier for Newcomer?
SUB: SOMETIMES IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO LEARN YHE WAY PEOPLE DO THINGS IN A NEW CULTURE. WHAT CAN WE DO TO MAKE LIFE EASIER FOR NEWCOMER? OR SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT VISITORS TO OTHER COUNTRIES SHOULD FOLLOW LOCAL CUSTOMS AND BEHAVIOUR. OTHERS DISAGREE AND THINK THAT THE HOST COUNTRY SHOULD WELCOME CULTURAL DIFFERENCES. DISCUSS BOTH THE VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION. ...
That is what was so great about the work of Hopkins; it was not only about realistic things that were happening during his time, but it was also about realistic things that could happen in the near future from where he was. This also something that was not very accepted by the people of his time period. Thinking of things that had not already happened was something that only a witch or devil would do (Sulloway p.59).
Hopkins’ work brought a different taste into the world of poetry and everyone will be able to appreciate his work. Most of Hopkins’ work had to do with religion. Although it sounds like his work should have been praised because it dealt with religion, it was rejected because it was about things that went against the church.
For instance one of his pieces was about a group of nuns that were crossing a bridge while it was collapsing(Fairwhether p.84).
This was a very big mistake for Hopkins because this caused there to be no audience for his work. Although this work was rejected by his time, it is greatly appreciated now because there is no one great religion anymore. There are many more religions that are practiced now then there were then. This is one of the reasons that Hopkins work is appreciated now. Gerard Manley Hopkins was a man of great talent.
Although the people of his time did not agree, he was a man that produced many masterpieces in his lifetime (Bergonzi p.113).
He went through a lot throughout his life and that was why he was such a great poet. Even if people of his time did not agree with what he wrote in his poems, his name will be preserved forever as one of the greatest poets in the world. His worked changed many views of people and it also caused more people to write about things that were on their minds instead of writing only of what they knew and had already experienced. Works Cited Bergonzi, Bernard. Gerard Manley Hopkins. Macmillan: New York.
The Essay on F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Life in His Work The Great Gatsby
Thesis Statement: Fitzgeralds life shows through in all aspects of his work, such is the case in The Great Gatsby. He uses his life to create people and places through out the book.I. James Gats- Jay GatsbyA.FitsgeraldB.Edward FullerC.Robert Kerr1.Edwin Gilman-Dan Cody2.Nellie Bly-Ella KayeD.Max GerlachE.Herbert Bayard SwopeII. Daisy Fay BuchanonA.Ginevre KingB.Zelda SayreIII. Meyer ...
1977. Bloom, Harold ed. Modern Critical Reviews: Gerard Manley Hopkins. Chelsea House Publishers: New York. 1986. Fairwhether, Eugent, The Oxford Movement. Oxford University Press: London. 1964. Sulloway, Alison. Gerard Manley Hopkins and the Victorian Temper. Columbia University Press: New York.
1972.
