Some people suggest that everyone between the ages of 18 and 21 should be required to perform one year of community or government service. Such service might include the Peace Corps, Environmental Conservancy Corps, a hospital, the military, a rural or inner-city school, or other community outreach projects. I believe forcing the service of any group of people is a bad idea. In this case, three reasons come to mind as to what makes this idea bad. First, I see this as a form of indentured servitude, even though the folks may earn a paycheck. Second, I feel that this idea takes away from the idea of the United States being a free place to live.
And third, much like the idea of the federal government considering funding for ‘faith-based’ programs, who determines which programs would qualify? These three reasons as enough for me to think the requirement of community service is a bad idea. The forcing of young people into community or government service could be seen as a form of indentured servitude. People working in those capacities would certainly receive a paycheck at the end of the day, and could go home to their families, but until their year of service is up, they have no other options to do what they will with their lives. I do think that community service is a wonderful idea. Volunteers at local hospitals, the Peace Corps and military provide an invaluable service to the community and to the country. But corrupting the system with people who may not want to be there will only deteriorate the effectiveness of the service.
The Report on Every Member of Society Should Be Required Before the Age of 21 to Perform at Least 1 Year of Community or Government Service.
... requiring people aged 18 to 21 to give a year of service to government of community organizations sounds like a good idea. It ... Conservancy Corps, a rural or inner-city schools, ... perform at least 1 year of community or government service, such as in the Piece Corps, the military, a hospital, the Environmental ...
I think a level of dissent would built among those with no interest in being there, and would ultimately result in the demise of various community efforts. The United States (U. S. ) is seen around the globe as a free place to live.
Certainly the U. S. has historically had its problems with slavery and indentured servitude, but as time has marched on, the U. S. worked to right those wrongs and pave the way for future generations to live free of such travesties. Forcing people to provide community or governmental services would be a step back in time.
It would undermine the underlying fabric of what makes the United States a great place to live. Instituting this type of program would force people to put their lives on hold for twelve months while doing something they may not believe in. Another consideration of this type of program would be which types of programs would qualify for service? Certainly the governing body of this proposed service would maintain a list of eligible services that 18 to 21 year olds could sign up for, but who determines the qualifications for programs? Would handicapped people be excluded from eligibility or excluded from required service? The maintaining of this list and the qualification process would certainly cost quite a bit of money. In the end, the cost of administering these services, as well as paying the young people for those services, may not be cost-beneficial.
Once limitations are in place for what a person could choose from, litigation would almost certainly follow. This complex decision making process alone would be enough for me to think this entire proposal is a bad one. Suggesting that young people between the ages of 18-21 be required to perform one year of community or government service is a bad idea. The concept of forcing people into these types of services takes away from the overall effectiveness that the programs currently offer. Additionally, instituting a form of servitude takes away from what the United States is all about. Forcing a group of people to do something they might opt not to do is not what being a free country is about.
The Essay on Leadership Scholarship Program People Community
There are two kinds of people in this world, followers and leaders. Followers are the people that never take a leadership role in any activity. However leaders are the ones that use their leadership skills to make a difference in this world, such as presidents, teachers, or even college graduates. Leadership is not something you can learn from a book, but you have to gain this skill through ...
Finally, such a program would constantly be finding itself deciding on what programs are eligible, ultimately resulting in soaring administrative costs, which again takes away from the overall mission of many community services. We must keep community and governmental services voluntary in order to protect the integrity of the services provided.
