Could you ever imagine falling in love with some who is different from you? However, your parents will not allow you to marry him/her. How would you feel? Nowadays many old time movies are coming back, in newer versions. For example, movies that were popular back in the 70’s and 80’s are now being redone with better special effects, and even sometimes the movies change their plot. In the movie Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, the plot sets us in a relationship where there is a couple that met in Hawaii, Joanna and her fiancé John Prentice, who fell in love with each other in a matter of no more than twenty minutes. On the other hand, in the movie Guess Who, the couple has been living together for over two years, Teresa and her fiancé Simon Green. The couple in the first movie is composed of the fiancé being an African American, while in the newer version of the movie “Guess Who”, the fiancé is Caucasian.
In the movie “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”, the couple visits Joanna’s side of the family, and they get together for dinner intended for only one night, during this time the couple decides to explain the story to the parents. However, in the movie Guess Who, the fiancé, Simon Green, spends a couple of days in New Jersey at his father-in-law’s house because of a 25 year anniversary reunion.
Another big difference between the movies “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”, and “Guess Who” is that the parents of the fiancé, Mr. & Mrs. Apprentice, meet with Joanna’s parents. On the contrary, in the movie “Guess Who” only the couple traveled to Joanna’s parent’s house.
The Term Paper on Cultures Tend Parents Joanna John
Guess Who's Coming to Dinner Joanna Drayton returns unexpectedly from Hawaii to announce her engagement to an intelligent, accomplished, world traveling doctor. The only problem with the intended union is that he is African American and she is white. The Drayton's come face to face with their own principles and realize that their daughter is the way they brought her up to be - non-prejudicial. ...
Another big difference between the two movies is that in the first movie, “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”, is that the fiancé never lied to the parents, about his job, his career, and so forth. While in the opposing movie, “Guess Who”, the fiancé Simon Green lied since the first moment that he arrived at his future parents-in-law’s home. For example, Simon lied about having a very important job; in addition, he lied by saying that he had worked with Jeff Gordon, as a pit crew member in NASCAR. He told this lie about NASCAR because his father-in-law loved sports, and Simon wanted to get on his good side. Little did he know that Percy, the father-in-law, was a big aficionado of Jeff Gordon, and Jeff was even somewhat his friend.
In the movie “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”, during the dialogue between the fiancé, John Apprentice, and his future father-in-law, John tells him that he would only marry his daughter if he had the approval of both of the parties. In contrast, in the movie “Guess Who”, it was known to the public that they were going to get married no matter what the parents said.
Both of the movies had some similar characters and scenes. Mutually, the movies had personal advisers. In “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”, Mat and Christina’s adviser was the priest, who was a close personal fiend, whereas in the movie “Guess Who”, Percy’s adviser was Daunte. Identically, both of the parents agree to let the couple get married with their full approval, and consent.
Analogously, both of the movies were extremely hilarious; the only difference between the movies was that the movie “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” is more of a drama story than a comedy. On the other hand, the movie “Guess Who” continues to be a comedy throughout the entire movie. In my personal opinion I would recommend anyone to watch both of the movies, for enjoyment and a great time.
The Essay on The Break-Up Movie Analysis
The film starts off with the protagonists’ encounter in a baseball tournament. Invitation communication begins with Gary asking Brooke if she would like to have a hotdog. On relationship meaning level, it reflects Gary’s interest in knowing Brooke. By the end of the tournament, Gary tries to ask her out, exploring the possibilities for a relationship with her. Despite Brooke calling him “crazy”, ...
