gun control One of our founding fathers, Benjamin Franklin, once stated: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. This applies to contemporary Americans in very direct way, even though that media try to convince us that this statement had lost its actuality, because of the realities of 21st century. Therefore, the issue of gun control has much broader applications than the pushers of left-wing agenda would like us to believe. The fact that some people seriously consider giving up their constitutional rights points out to their spiritual degradation. In the last century, before the fall of Rome, its citizens were increasingly trying to bring back the spirit of their ancestors, who established and fought for the Roman empire. They used to dye their hair and to artificially whiten their skin. But it never helped them.
Their downfall became imminent when they choose to pay the ransom to the barbarians, so that they would leave them alone, instead of joining the army and simply fighting back. One does not have to be a historian to be able to draw parallels between ancient Rome and contemporary America, where liberal psychos impose their sick views in absolutely legal matter. They try to convince the American people that guns are evil, therefore the private gun ownership should be outlawed, even though that our democracy is based on the principle of citizens being able to depose its own government, when it fails to protect them or when it tries to take away people’s civil freedoms. Yet, it is only possible if citizens are armed. The liberal lunatics never stop whining about American schools becoming more and more dangerous, because of recent shootings, yet they support the policy of multiculturalism, which is the main cause of it. Their paranoid fear of guns goes as far as making them to suggest that even the police officers should not carry the guns, because they tend to use it more against people of colour.
The Term Paper on Bear Arms Gun Guns People
... deprives the right of the American citizen to purchase a certain gun they he may want. Why? Because many people believe that no one ... harassed for simply trying to make a living, and supply guns to American citizens who they hope will use the weapons responsibly. This ... keep the guns out of 16 sets of bad hands but what about the two-hundred thousand? It deprived those American citizens the ...
Rosie O’Donnel, who despite being grossly overweight, remains a popular TV host among stupid housewives like herself, does not hesitate to advertise her sick views during the live TV broadcast: I don’t care if you think it’s your right. I say: Sorry, it’s 1999. We have had enough as a nation. You are not allowed to own a gun, and if you do own a gun I think you should go to prison (O’Donnel).
It would not be as bad if only mentally retarded talk-show hosts spoke in favour of banning the private gun ownership. But we have a whole bunch of politicians, like Hillary Clinton, who also think that it is appropriate to defy the most fundamental principle, upon which the American democracy is based.
They say that many peoples’ lives would be saved if we outlaw guns. Is it really so? Immediately after the hurricane Catrina, the Blacks and Hispanics of New Orleans began to engage in the the most gruesome acts of looting, ever recorded in American history. It brought the local society on the verge of collapse, as every notion of orderly social conduct was forgotten by the looters, within a split of a second. If it wasn’t the fact the many white people in the area owned guns, the social chaos would prove to be impossible to constrain, since the police officers were nowhere to be seen, often because they themselves were busy looting the stores. It is a fact that during the Catrina disaster, the private gun ownership helped to maintain some social stability, which resulted in saving the lives of many people. Thus, guns don’t just kill people but they also save them.
The Essay on Distinguishing People Around the World: Social Structures and Social Institutions
From a sociological perspective, it is both an oversimplification and an inaccuracy to conclude that people around the world, or even within the same country, are fundamentally the same. There are similarities. The scientific methodologies used by sociologists to study different types of human interactions and social facts instead suggest that people are different in important ways and that these ...
I’m strongly convinced that it is not just a civil right to own a gun, it also a duty of every responsible citizen of this country, who understands that fully relying on some remote authority to provide law and order, especially in diverse areas, is naive. There should be a law that forbids certain categories of people to own guns, no doubt about it. Also, people who own guns must make sure that they are safely stored. But this about it. The essential right to bear guns by private citizens cannot be restricted. The realization of this fact will come as soon as this country is governed by the men again, instead of hysterical housewives, who become politicians.
Bibliography:
Benjamin Franklin.
2006. Wikiquote. 10 Apr. 2006. http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin Gun Control Lunacy. 2006. The Museum of Left-Wing Lunacy. 10 Apr.
2006. http://www.museumofleftwinglunacy.com/guncontrol.h tm Zakaria, Fareed Freedom Vs. Security 8 Jul. 2002. FareedZakaria.com 10 Apr. 2006. http://www.fareedzakaria.com/ARTICLES/newsweek/070 802_security.html.
