I decided to write my paper on Mill for two main reasons. The first deals with happiness and virtue and his take on these things. I would first off like to state my disagreements with his ideas and then I will speak of my agreements. Mill contends that a less intelligent individual can not be as happy as one with a greater intellectual capacity. He also states that you would not be happy as swine even if everything you desired was given. I disagree.
I feel that if you do not know of what you do not have then you cannot miss it. If we were less intelligent then we would be more content with the more primal needs that our ancestors had. If their needs were met then they were happy. Can we say the same for ourselves? Even if I had everything I ever wanted I could not be as happy as a caveman who had a mate, good hunting grounds and a full stomach.
They had no one to worry about except protecting their clan. Yet we as a more civilized culture have much more to concern ourselves with. We must not only worry about ourselves and our families but also our neighbors and communities. If a caveman was considered virtuous it was because he was a good protector and provider and could be relied upon by his clan, yet for a man to now be considered virtuous it takes almost the same but this goal is much harder to achieve. I do feel like Mill that to live virtuously is a goal that we should all strive to attain and like him I believe that these acts will not bring about happiness as an end but by acting in such a manner will contribute to your overall happiness exponentially.
The Term Paper on Brave New World Happy Happiness Citizens
Who do you think are the happiest: the citizens of Utopia, those of Bensalem, or those of Brave New World? The book definition of happiness is a state of well-being characterized by emotions ranging from contentment to intense joy. The true meaning of happiness varies from person to person. Everyone has a different definition of what happiness means to them and what can make one person happy, can ...
I also like the fact that that if something should bring about your happiness then it is ok to try and achieve it such as money. He does not say it is wrong to try and get as much money as you can and he says it is ok if it is a means to an end for bringing you happiness. Money will buy many of our desires and wishes and for many it is there main goal in life and yet for others obtaining the money itself is there goal. That alone will bring them happiness as it is there driving force and having enough will satisfy them. This in many occasions will make the person noxious to others but not always. We should look at this then that to try and achieve a lot of money but not become noxious and still trying to live virtuously would be acceptable.
That is not necessarily everyone’s goal who hopes to acquire a lot of money but if one acted in such a manner and it was a means to making him happy then it would be acceptable according to my understanding of Mill’s philosophy. Should we all therefore stop trying to do anything other then get rich? No this is not what we should do. What we should strive for is to make ourselves happy by whatever means is necessary as long as we continue to live with virtue. Not because virtue is a means to our happiness but because virtue is a blessing to others whom we deal with and it will become a part of our happiness because of how we look at ourselves and how others look upon us. Virtue then should be our driving force in life, because it is desired above all else. We will move on to justice now since in a sense it still pertains to virtue.
Justice is what we look for when we have been wronged or our rights have been violated. Who is to say what is just? Can I say it is unjust because I am not rich? No but I could say it was unjust if I was not rich because someone stronger then me came along and took what was mine. I could also say it was unjust if I was due a certain amount and never received it, or someone prevented me from collecting it. I also like what Mill has to say about justice also being a moral requirement. I agree with this completely. If we know an action of ours was wrong yet it would save a life or bring about more good then any harm it would cause even though this action may not be virtuous it would be the proper recourse for someone who believed in justice.
The Essay on Can Money Buy Happiness?
Money makes the world go around. Money can take you places that you could never imagine. Growing up in my household I was considered a spoiled brat. My mother gave my sister and I any thing our heart desired. My cousins always wanted to come over our house because we had any toy you could think of. But as I got older I realized that material things did not make me happy. That’s why I believe ...
Do we leave a toddler in the crosswalk to be hit by a car because it is wrong to jaywalk? Would we let a man bleed to death because we do not have a medical license and would not want to be sued for practicing without one? I say no because we have a moral obligation to act accordingly and to protect these individuals if it is within our power. Justice takes on many forms and is not always a clear cut and dry scenario such as the ones I have stated here, yet if you act morally and virtuously where possible you will help contribute to your overall happiness and the happiness of your community. I will now speak about my second reason for choosing Mill for my paper and why he is the philosopher I have enjoyed most so far. This deals with our lecture we received on him and his thoughts concerning sacrifice and the betterment of the whole.
To sacrifice for the good of the community is living virtuously. What is more honorable then doing what you can to make sure your way of life is protected? Are to save others from a fate that your sacrifice could possibly put a stop to? Does a parent have to think of these things when thinking of a sacrifice they might need to make for there children? Does a father say well my kids can go hungry because there is not much too eat and I am more important? Does a mother say I do not care if my child is sick and needs to go to the doctor I want a new pair of shoes and do not have enough money to do both? No it is unthought-of (At least for those with any morals or virtues).
These are simple to deduct but what about when we face times of war? Who decides who is sacrificed then? Is it right of them to make such decisions? I say yes. If we have placed these people in a position of authority then they have that right because we have placed our trust in them to act in a manner that will be for the good of our community.
It then becomes our right to make this sacrifice. If we do not then someone else must take our place. Then we have not only acted wrongly but we have shirked our duty to our community and placed someone else’s life at risk for our own cowardice or selfishness. Therefore the good of the community should be sacrificed for, and those in charge should be able to make those decisions based on the trust we placed in them when they received those positions. I will sum this up by stating that living virtuously, morally and by willing to sacrifice for the greater good sum up most of Mill’s philosophy all of which I agree with wholeheartedly.
The Term Paper on Sacrificing A Little For The Good Of All
Sacrificing a little for the good of all Why the Government must, at times, infringe upon individual liberties. The Abortion Issue Brian L. Pedigo 12 July 1999 Throughout the history of our country, the State has been called on to place certain restraints on freedoms. These restraints have been instituted by all levels of government during times when action was warranted to provide for the ...
