Factors Affecting health care Administration career development By Gender Differences Analysis of Issues in the Health Care Industry Factors Affecting Health care administration Career Development in Gender Differences Introduction Evaluating the research supporting this article involves thoughtful examination of all aspects of the report. The purpose is to maintain an objective balance while identifying both the pluses and minuses of the research. When weaknesses are identified, they are evaluated to determine whether they represent minor issues or major flaws (Soeken, 2000, p. 882-893).
Following examination of both the strengths and weaknesses, conclusion is made about the relevance of the study for clinical practice and for further research (Anonymous, 2000, p.
326).
Discussion Ruchika and Nitin (1998) examine gender differences in organizational and individual factors that have been modeled as influences on career development. The authors state the problem clearly and concisely in the opening lines of their article. For effective research, the problem needs to be narrow enough to allow a focused study, that is broad enough to remain relevant and significant.
The Essay on The injustice in health care
Question: “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane” (Martin Luther King, Jr.). Do you agree with this statement? Write an essay persuading readers of your point of view. Support your argument with evidence from appropriate sources. Nick Vujicic, the founder of Life Without Limbs Organization of Australia, said in his speech,” Attitude is Altitude. ...
Their findings reveal that more than one-half of the recent graduates of masters health care administration programs are women. However, this study determines that men earn an average of $61, 491 per year while women (with the same educational background) earn $50, 839 (Criztens).
Monifa (2000) states, as a man pursuing a career in health care administration, there many advantages. Even more significantly, the male network may provide access to 2 mentors within the organization (Hirsch, 1999).
Katzenbach (1999) research of managers found that women frequently had less contact with their supervisors and lack corporate mentors despite their participation in organizations, but these studies suggest that women lack integration into the informal, but more significant, organization culture causing averse career development. Gender differences in organizational and individual factors that have been modeled as influences on career development were evaluated (Sigel 1999).
Crosby, (1999) says these factors included financial and nonfinancial benefits, access to training programs, indicators of success, demographics and motivations underlying education, employment, and career choices. Conclusion Career development differs for male and female health care executives, however, the distinctions appear to be influenced more by demographic and organizational variable than by individual career motivations. 10 REFERENCES Anonymous (2000).
Manufacturing management: Return of the stop watch. Economist, 326.
69. OBeirne, K. (2000).
Factors affecting health administration: Gender Difference. Womens International Network News, 25. 25-27.
Criztens, R. (1999).
Racing to the top. Inc.
, 16, 46-47. Crosby, C. B. (1999).
Completeness quality for the 21 st century. New York: Penguin Books USA. Hirsch, C. L. (1999).
Still explicit gender discrimination.
Massachusetts: Human Resource Development Press. Katzenbach, J. R. (1999).
The Essay on Principles for implementing duty of care in health, social care or children’s and young people’s setting
1.2 All practitioners have a duty of care all the children the setting, this also includes the staff. A duty of care is where a practitioner has to take care of them and not let them get harmed in any way. This will involve the children attention, watching out for hazards and preventing mistakes or accidents. If a practitioner has not met the duty of care required then they can be held accountable ...
Real change leaders. New York: McKinsey & Company.
Monifa, A. (2000).
Race and gender matter in health care, Inc. , 17, 8-32. Ruchika, T. & Nitin, W.
, (2000).
Hues: Shades of thought. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Soeken, S.
(2000).
Critiquing research: Steps for complete evaluation of an article. American Operating Room Nurse Journal, 41, 882-893. Sigel, L. S. , (1999).
New careers in hospitals. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group. Bibliography REFERENCES Anonymous (2000).
Manufacturing management: Return of the stop watch. Economist, 326. 69.
OBeirne, K. (2000).
Factors affecting health administration: Gender Difference. Womens International Network News, 25. 25-27. Criztens, R.
(1999).
Racing to the top. Inc. , 16, 46-47. Crosby, C. B.
(1999).
Completeness quality for the 21 st century. New York: Penguin Books USA. Hirsch, C. L. (1999).
Still explicit gender discrimination. Massachusetts: Human Resource Development Press. Katzenbach, J. R. (1999).
Real change leaders.
New York: McKinsey & Company. Monifa, A. (2000).
Race and gender matter in health care, Inc. , 17, 8-32.
Ruchika, T. & Nitin, W. , (2000).
Hues: Shades of thought. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Soeken, S.
(2000).
Critiquing research: Steps for complete evaluation of an article. American Operating Room Nurse Journal, 41, 882-893. Sigel, L. S. , (1999).
New careers in hospitals. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group.
