Once I finished watching the movie Hotel Rwanda, the first thought that came up to me was that the structure and the lesson of the story seems to be similar with the very well-known movie Schindeler’s List: A very average, wise man with a motive that emerged from nowhere to risk all that he has to save the lives of a couple hundred people with the same destiny, death. Hotel Rwanda is based on the genocide during the early 1990s where the Tutsis were being exterminated by the Hutu. As the reporter even pointed out, the massacre might be seen from the TV sets around the world, and they would say ” ‘Oh my God, that’s terrible’, and they’ll go on eating their dinners,” he declares.. Instead of basing the movie on a larger view, it is enclosed to a small location just in the hotel, focused more on a less known, less understood horror, on one man who made a difference.
Paul Rusesabagina, manager of a five-star hotel in Kigali. A smart man who ingratiates rich guests, using bribes to obtain a smooth business in the hotel. Other than his wife and children, he is careless about the outer world. His character is revealed through the early scene as the political tension increases all over the country and the soldiers storming through his neighbors home’s at night. Paul coldly declines to help his neighbor by saying, “He isn’t family. Family is all that matters.
As a Hutu himself with a Tutsi wife (Tatiana), he becomes a hero accidently when helping the people that stayed in his house. Yet later using his hotel to keep the refugees, he realises that it was almost his duty to save lives of the Tutsi. Using all the skills he had gained from the past experiences of hotel management such as giving beers to the Hutu soldiers to buy time, flawlessly convincing an American General in order to keep the Tutsis in his hotel alive. Faced with bizzare circumstances, and becoming more soft-hearted, at the end of the film he is in grief and apologizing to the refugees: “I wish I could have done more”.
The Term Paper on 12 Angry Men Movie Analysis
Introduction: This movie analysis will focus on the movie 12 Angry Men. There will be comparisons between the movie and the different negotiation tactics used in the movie and even in class. There were lessons learned from this movie and it gave new ways of thinking. This movie does a great job of using negotiation to win over a case when you are the odd man out. Summary: This movie focuses on a ...
Relating this movie to the current event we have discussed about in class: the genocide perpetuated on the non-Arab by the Arabs extremists in Sudan, Darfur. We can see that the difference from the massacre in Rwanda and Darfur is that the conflict between the Tutsi and Hutus only lasted for a couple of weeks. While on the other hand, the genocide in Darfur has begun since Feburary, 2003 and is still ongoing conflict. Due to violence form the militia in Sudan (known as the Janjaweed), disease and starvation, 400,000 lives has already been taken away. Another one million are still stranded in their villages suffering from torture, rape, bombings and raids. We can know that the conditions are similar to the movie Hotel Rwanda and are able to imagine the conditions of the people in Darfur.
I have learned from watching this movie that one person can make a difference. Even if we aren’t there to witness the events we are still able to give a hand to those who aren’t able to help themselves. Even if we can’t become a hero for hundreds as Paul did, being able to save one person is making a difference.
