CHAPTER 1 THE AMAZING THEORY OF RAW-MATERIAL SCARCITY The Great Toy Shortage Forget it, Virginia. Santa won’t be leaving a “Star Wars” R 2-D 2 doll under the tree this year – just an I. O. U. promising you one at some vague time between February and June. Don’t count on a Mego Micro naut kit for building your own robot either, or a Milky the Marvelous Milking Cow, which drinks water when its tail is pumped, moos plaintively and squirts a tiny pailful of cloudy white “milk” from a detachable pink udder…
Not since the Grinch stole Christmas has there been such an unseasonable shortage. Newsweek, December 19, 1977, p. 58 CHAPTER 1 – TABLE OF CONTENTS The Great Toy Shortage Between Pig Copper and Dentistry What Do We Mean by “Scarcity” What is the Best Way to Forecast Scarcity and Costs Will the Future Break With the Past A Challenge to the Doomsayers to Put Their Money Where Their Mouths Are Summary Afternote 1 The “True” Cost (Price) of Natural Resources Afternote 2: The Ultimate Shortage The “Great Toy Shortage” of 1977 clearly was a freak event. We don’t worry that a scarcity of Hula-Hoops, pencils, dental care, radios, or new musical compositions will last. And we don’t fear that a larger population will reduce the supply of these goods; manufacturers will make more. Yet people do worry about an impending scarcity of copper, iron, aluminum, oil, food, and other natural resources.
The Essay on Contrasting Values in the Great Gatsby
In 1920s, after WW1, USA went under a radical change and social reform took place. The developments in industrialization caused a decay in moral values. This resulted in materialism's obliteration of the doctrines and rules of moral duties. Thus, the society was torn apart due to the clash between old and new values. The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald reflects the American society during this ...
According to a typical pronouncement by Paul Ehrlich, the best-known contemporary doomster, “In the early 1970 s, the leading edge of the age of scarcity arrived. With it came a clearer look at the future, revealing more of the nature of the dark age to come.” That we are enter in an age of scarcity in which our finite natural resources are running out, that our environment is becoming more polluted, and that population growth threatens our civilization and our very lives – such propositions are continually repeated with no more evidence than that “everyone knows” they are true. Is there a fundamental economic difference between extractive natural resources and Hula-Hoops or dental care Why do people expect that the supply of wheat will decline but the supplies of toys and drugs will increase These are the questions that this chapter explores. The chapter draws examples from the metallic raw materials, which are relatively unencumbered by government regulations or international cartels and which are neither “burned up” like oil nor grown anew like agricultural products. Energy, food, and land will be given special treatment in later chapters.
BETWEEN PIG COPPER AND DENTISTRY There is an intuitive difference between how we get Hula-Hoops and copper. Copper comes from the earth, whereas a Hula-Hoop does not seem to be a “natural” resource. Copper miners go after the richest, most accessible lodes first. Therefore, they dig into lodes bearing successively lower grades of ore. If all else were equal, this trend would imply that the cost of extracting copper from the ground must continually rise as poorer and less accessible lodes are mined.
Hula-Hoops and dental care and radios seem different from copper because most of the cost of a radio, a Hula-Hoop, or dental care arises from human labor and skill, and only a small part arises from the raw material – the petroleum in the plastic hoop or the silver in the tooth filling. For good reason we do not worry that human labor and skill comes from progressively less accessible reservoirs. But all this neat theorizing about the increasing scarcity of minerals contradicts a most peculiar fact: Over the course of history, up to this very moment, copper and other minerals have been getting less scarce, rather than more scarce as the depletion theory implies they should. In this respect copper follows the same historical trend as radios, undershirts, and other consumer goods (figures 1-1 a and 1-1 b).
The Term Paper on Group Theory Participant Material
From the beginning of time it has been evident that as humans we function better in groups than individually (Joining pg. 4). The Cro-Magnon's discovered early in time that they were more efficient and productive working in groups than when working independently. Once they pooled their resources, people, and knowledge the possibilities were endless. Until I read the text Joining Together, I had ...
It is this fact that forces us to go beyond the simple theory and to think more deeply about the matter.
FIGURE 1-1 a. The Scarcity of Copper as Measured by Its Price Relative to Wages FIGURE 1-1 b. The Scarcity of Copper as Measured by Its Price Relative to the Consumer Price Index At the end of this confrontation between theory and fact, we shall be compelled to reject the simple Malthusian depletion theory, and to offer a new theory. The revised theory will suggest that natural resources are not finite in any meaningful economic sense, mind-boggling though this assertion may be.
That is, there is no solid reason to believe that there will ever be a greater scarcity of these extractive resources in the long-run future than now. Rather, we can confidently expect copper and other minerals to get progressively less scarce. WHAT DO WE MEAN BY “SCARCITY” Here we must pause for an unexciting but crucial issue, the definition of “scarcity.” Ask yourself: If copper – or oil or any other good – were much scarcer today than it actually is, what would be the evidence of this scarcity That is, what are the signs – the criteria – of a raw material being in short supply Upon reflection perhaps you will not expect a complete absence of the material as a sign of scarcity. We will not reach up to the shelf and suddenly find that it is completely bare. The scarcity of any raw material would only gradually increase. Long before the shelf would be bare, individuals and firms – the latter operating purely out of the self-interested drive to make profits – would be stockpiling supplies for future resale so that the shelf would never be completely bare.
Of course the price of the hoarded material would be high, but there still would be some quantities to be found at some price, just as there always has been some small amount of food for sale even in the midst of the very worst famines. The preceding observation points to a key sign of what we generally mean by increasing scarcity: a price that has persistently risen. More generally, cost and price – whatever we mean by “price,” and shortly we shall see that that term is often subject to question – will be our basic measures of scarcity. In some situations, though, prices can mislead us. Governments may prevent the price of a scarce material from rising high enough to “clear the market” – that is, to discourage enough buyers so that supply and demand come to be equal, as they ultimately will be in a free market. If so, there may be waiting lines or rationing, and these may also be taken as signs of scarcity.
The Essay on Karl Marx-theory Of Social Change
Theory of social change Marx’s focus on the process of social change is so central to this thinking that it informs all his writings. The motor force of history for Marx is not to be found in any extra-human agency, be it “providence” or the “objective spirit.” Marx insisted that men make their own history. Human history is the process through which men change ...
But though lines and rationing may Young and gifted, but not talented.
