Collaborating is Cheating when you plagiarize
Human beings constantly create hierarchies by arranging all things known to them in order of rank. Hierarchies are abound in man’s life: our laws, for example, have differing degrees of punishment depending on the severity of the crime. Yet, the ultimate question becomes whether human beings would be justified in creating a hierarchy for the different disciplines of knowledge. If the presence of a clearly observable universal principle governing the discipline is used as a ranking criterion, then the creation of a hierarchy of disciplines is justified.
In order to assess the validity of this premise it is necessary to understand exactly what the disciplines are and how they will be classified. By definition, a discipline is a branch of knowledge; consequently, a dissection of knowledge yields eight different disciplines: mathematics, logic, language, natural science, social science, history, moral judgment, and aesthetics. The disciplines will be ranked on the basis of how far the knowledge they contain can be classified under a clearly observable universal principle.
Language occupies the very top of the hierarchy. Defined simply as a means of communication, language is as old as humanity itself. In every human culture men have found some means of communicating thoughts and ideas to each other, thereby making language universal.
The Essay on Universal Human Right
What, according to H. Gene Blocker, are the most important historical sources of the idea that all humans possess inalienable rights? To what extent, if at all, do you see those sources reflected in contemporary cultureAccording to H. Gene Blocker, the most important historical sources of the idea that all humans possess inalienable rights or “natural” human rights have its roots from ...
Of course, there are many who would call such a proposition ludicrous. All one has to do is look around to see how much trouble humans have when it comes to bridging the gap created by different languages. Language is not universal simply because people who speak different languages can not communicate with each other. Yet, this view is incorrect because it fails to acknowledge the essential nature of language, which includes assigning symbols and sounds to specific objects. Just because an apple might be called la manzana, jabuka, or la pomme in different languages does not mean that we are talking about a different object. The fact that an object is assigned a name through a clearly observable process proves the presence of a universal principle in language.
