Revolutions occurred throughout the world roughly between 1750 and 1914. Beginning with Britain, it started to industrialize in the 1780s. By the 1890s, the idea of industrialization had spread to Russia. These two industrial revolutions were similar to an extent. They both set in motion their industrial revolutions with the steam-powered railroad. Also, the outcomes of industrializing caused major environmental effects.
However, they were different from each other in the way that Russia initially produced heavy industry while Britain made consumer goods. The Industrial Revolutions of Britain and Russia both focused on railroads. British railroads set off its industrial revolution. When James Watt created a more effective steam engine in 1765, who knew that this would become the center of railroads and more importantly Britain’s economy? These railroads were first used to transport raw materials, such as coal and iron ore, from the mines. Later on, railroads became available for public use in 1825.
It was called the Stockton and Darlington Railroad. Similarly, Russia’s industrial revolution got going when the government built a railroad. Since Russia was still an empire, the tsar assembled a railroad to connect all the places inside the empire. The railroads were also constructed to allow Russians to indulge in their coal and iron deposits. The most popular railroad was the Trans-Siberian line, which linked Moscow and Vladivostok. Because of steam-engine railroads, the industrial revolutions of Britain and Russia began.
The Essay on British Chartism Parliament Industrial Britain
The outcome of the social revolutions of 1830-1833 left Europe in a general sense of discontent. Governments were doing their best to limit democratic movements by restricting voting privileges to the wealthier middle classes. Limited voting power kept the Whig party 'safe'; from radical pressure in Britain. These absurd manipulations of the electorate and parliament encouraged democrats and ...
Whenever you have new technology, there are going to be some negative effects. For Russia and Britain, this negative effect was environmental due to their industrial revolutions. In these two places, fossil fuels replaced wind, water, wood, people, and animals as a source of energy. Because so many factories were being built and numerous machines required fossil fuels, the environment faced hardships. The extreme of this was seen when pollution, deforestation, and soil erosion took place. Other consequences nclude greenhouse gases, smog, ozone layer devastation, and a lot more permanent impacts. These are still a problem to this day. The environment definitely took a turn for the worst when the Industrial Revolution started. The materials Russia and Britain initially produced were totally opposite for different reasons. Provided that Russia had lost both the Crimean War against Britain, France, the Ottoman Empire, and the Kingdom of Sardinia and the Russo-Japanese War, they made Russia want to industrialize. The lack of a strong army led to them generating heavy industry.
Heavy industry consisted of big, military technology using steel, such as tanks. Russia went on to become the fourth largest steel producer in the world. On the other hand, Britain began with consumer goods, especially in the textile industry. Britain’s growing population and empire required more textiles to be made. Textiles were used for clothes and everyone needs clothes so they were in great demand. Textile factories prospered between 1800 and 1850 because new technologies were invented, people were now able to buy stuff, and the American colonies gave Britain raw materials.
Russia and Britain had diverse needs based on their societies and histories so they started with different industries. In conclusion, Britain and Russia had industrial revolutions that created new technologies and affected their peoples. They caused long-lasting environmental effects and concentrated mostly on the steam-powered railroad to transport products. Although having these similarities, a difference lay in the fact that Russia produced more heavy industry due to their war loses while Britain focused on the textile industry to support its large population and workforce.
The Essay on The Publishing Industry vs Technology
The spread of information has been well documented. What this means for the publishing world is still being worked out. Viral marketing through Web2. 0 and social networking is outdating the traditional mass-appeal advertisements. People are linking articles and texts to their online friends and this will be the way a market for a particular publication will be organically grown. The rapid ...
