Beginning with the Children’s Internet protection act that was effective in April 2000, the advances in information technology stem from the use of websites and other online services that became available during this time as a result of new ethical issues and the importance of this act’s creation.
Second, The Do Not Call Implementation Act of 2003 that became effective in October 2003 highlights the advances in information technology with regard to databases and an increased Internet access as a result of new ethical issues and the necessary creation of this act. Within the contents of this paper, the advances in information technology in regard to increased access to online services, the use of websites and databases as new ethical issues during these time frames will highlight the importance of each act’s creation.
Information Technology Acts on: the Children’s Internet Protection Act of 2000 and the Do Not Call Implementation Act of 2003 There is always a purpose behind any act that has been put through legislation and carried on to gain approval and implementation. In some cases, the purpose behind an act of Congress can come from new advances in information technology where new issues arise and become apparent. In both the Children’s Internet Protection Act of 2000, and the Do Not Call Implementation Act of 2003, there were new ethical issues that made the creation of each of these acts necessary.
The Essay on Information Technology Acts 3
... through. What were the advances in information technology that resulted in new ethical issues necessitating the creation of each act? The interesting comparison of The ... challenged by the telemarketing industry, however the Do Not Call Implementation Act was passed to allow the FTC to establish fees sufficient ...
The creation of each of these acts was necessary because of the advances in information technology that led to new ethical issues at the time. In the following paragraphs, the advances in information technology that led to new ethical issues at the time of each act’s essential creation will be addressed. The Children’s Internet Protection Act of 2000 (CIPA) enforces the final rules and guidelines following the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of 1998.
The advances in information technology regarding this act deal with the use of websites and online services by children under the age of 13 (“Children’s online privacy protection act of 1998 (COPPA),” 2000).
New ethical issues surfaced from the increased use of websites and online services by children under the age of 13 that concerned the protection of a minor’s identification and from specific content that was available. The CIPA provides guidelines and regulations to implement the important features involved in the Internet use of minors.
The important features in the CIPA require the specific inappropriate content to either filter out in the Internet settings, or for blocked access to the content in the Internet settings. Additionally, the CIPA has established rules and guidelines that requires the operators of the sites or online services to cooperate (“Children’s online privacy protection act of 1998 (COPPA),” 2000).
The advances in information technology with the use of websites and online services by children under the age of 13 brought to light the ethical issues that surround the use of the Internet by minors.
The ethical issues involved the protection of a minor’s identity and the overall protection from any inappropriate content. The creation of CIPA was necessary for the protection of a minor’s identification and for the general protection of any minor from inappropriate content while using online services and accessing websites. The Do Not Call Implementation Act of 2003 allows consumers the opportunity to limit the telemarketing phone calls that they receive.
The Essay on Tongue Piercing Online Internet
Tongue Piercing I remember my first encounter with tongue piercing. The pierced was absolutely gorgeous, with brown eyes, messy black hair, and a 3/4 inch barbell in the center of his tongue. His name was Phish, like the band. I admired Phish because he did not care what other people thought about him. He was an intelligent, artistic, and interesting person. I think that body piercing is a ...
The act provides a national registry where consumers can make the request to have their names listed and not receive calls from telemarketers. Additionally, the Do Not Call Implementation Act of 2003 requires telemarketers to access the registry and update the calling lists that they have of registered names every three months (Jacobs, 2003).
The advances in information technology with this act deals with the increasing use of databases. New ethical issues surfaced from the increased use of databases considering consumer information became very accessible, through things such as the Internet.
These ethical issues deal with the tremendous access that telemarketers have to a consumer’s information, in regard to databases and the Internet in general making personal information very accessible to the public. In the creation of this act, the consumer can make a choice in regard to who can contact him or her, and the telemarketers must adhere to the consumers request (Jacobs, 2003).
The creation of the Do Not Call Implementation Act was necessary to enforce rules and regulations in solicitation and to protect a consumer’s choice and information properly.
To conclude, the advances in information technology that resulted in new ethical issues necessitated the creation of both the Children’s Internet Protection Act and the Do Not Call Implementation Act. The Children’s Internet Protection Act was necessary for the protection of a minor’s identity and for the overall protection of a minor from inappropriate content while using online services and accessing websites. The Do Not Call Implementation Act was necessary to protect a consumer’s choice and information and for the general enforcement of rules and regulations in solicitation.
