Sources of information vary, but it is estimated that one in five children are physically, emotionally or sexually abused in our country. There are many who believe, most abuse is nothing more than parents exerting their “right” to discipline their children and letting it get a little out of hand. People are tragically missed informed thinking beating children is a moral choice, which then makes it their decision. If one thinks it’s morally right to hit a child, then when the day comes where they beat their children to death…what is it then? Where does one draw the line on moral choice for child abuse?
Each year, millions of dollars are poured into child protection agencies in our country. This money would go to local facilities such as, foster homes and juvenile halls. There are also dollar grants that go to thousands of private organizations whose missions include basic child abuse preventions, and the counseling of abusive parents and victims. Each year the number of children being abused increases dramatically, estimate being about 3 million this year. Why? Why cause the tragedy of child abuse? Why makes this a moral choice when in reality everyone knows it’s wrong. There are people out there who know, beating their children is wrong, but yet still don’t hesitate one bit when deciding whether to hit their child or not. A lot of child abusers were once victims of child abuse. On any given day, some adult who was once a victim of a dark past of child abuse may vent his or her locked up frustrations on the society or the ones they love. We can stop this if we just say that the moral choice in this situation is, it’s morally wrong. No matter what the child has done, it’s never bad enough for a beating.
The Term Paper on Problem Solving How Do We Combat Child Abuse
Imagine being a young child. Picture that someone is mistreating you, and you are completely unable to retaliate in any way. Imagine what would be running through your mind, all of the fear and hatred that you can do nothing with except hold it all inside. The United States government defines child abuse specifically as [a]ny recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker which ...
The public is well informed about the most common cases of child abuse. Unusual “accidents “ attract the media, which then raises the ratings. We hear stories of fathers hitting their children to an unconscious state, then going to bed and leaving them lying on the floor. We hear case were parents’ beat there children to death and then hide their bodies for a period of time. There then are the more common cases, were the media has little to with because the abuse isn’t “intense” enough. These common cases include, disappearing kids and runaways. Thousands of abused girls, each year, run away from home and sell their bodies in order to survive. Others would runaway and join gangs who are committed to violence and distraction. As I stated in the beginning, most child abuse victims hide their past deep within, so deep they think it would be impossible becoming an abuser themselves. They would live normal lives becoming husbands and wives, raising families and careers. But the ordinary problems of everyday life would often force the former abuse victim to behave as they were thought as children. They continue, because they unknowingly become the object their frustration and complete the full cycle of rage. We can’t blame these poor abused children; this is the way they were taught, right? It may be morally wrong to beat your child, but when they grew up, in their eyes they though it was a form of “punishment” which then made it morally right. There are children out there who have been abused but they stay quietly locked in their shells. They think that by choosing to look the other way will hide their horrible past. Again this is a sign of moral choice.
Essay On The Profound Effects Of Child Sexual Abuse
For all intensive purposes, my paper considers the use of the masculine pronoun with offenders, and the feminine pronoun with victims, though I recognize that it happens either way. Imagine Think back to third grade. Think of the classroom you sat in at school, and think of the clothes you were wearing, the teacher at the front of the room. Think of every detail you can remember. Now try and ...
How far will this world go before realizing that we do have a major abusive problem here? Before we make an end to all this madness, how many children have to die. Nothing most of us will ever do combines the moral weight of life-or-death choice with the concrete intimacy of the moment as carefully as the conscious handling of a beating, sometimes even deliberately designed to kill. As such, there are lessons both merciless and priceless to be learned from such an event, lessons which are not simply instructive to the person but transformative of one’s whole emotional, reflexive, and moral character. These lessons deal with everything coming down to you; no one is raising your fist at your child. All the talk-talk in your head, all the emotions in your heart, all the experiences of your past, these things may inform your choice, but they can’t raise your fist. All the socialization, rationalization and justification in the world, all the approval or disapproval of your neighbors, none of these things can force you to beat your children. They can change how you feel about the choice, but only you can actually make the choice. Only you. Only here. Only now. Hit, or not. A second is this; never be able to count on undoing your choices. If you beat you child till there is no breath left in their body, dead is dead. You can’t take it back. There are no do-overs. Real choice is like that; you make it, you live with it, or die with it. A third lesson is this; the society doesn’t car about motives. If you wailed your child in the head a few times and killed him/her on an accident, you didn’t think they would die. Well it’s the same as doing it intentionally. “I didn’t mean to” may persuade others that you are less likely to repeat a behavior, but it won’t bring a corpse back to life.
To believe one is incompetent to beat there child to death, therefore, is one to live in an almost always-needless fear of the self in fact, to insist oneself a moral coward. A state further from “the dignity of a free man” would be rather hard to imagine. It is a way to show us the dignity and courage and moral self-confidence of free women/men that the safety of our children is the final moral lesson of none abuse. Right choices are possible, and the ordinary judgment of ordinary women/men is enough to make them. We can, truly, embrace our power and our responsibility to make life-or-death decisions, rather than fearing both. We can accept our ultimate responsibility for our own actions. We can know not just intellectually, but in the help of experience that we are fit to choose. And not only can we trust, but also we must. If we fail this test, we fail not only in private virtue but consequently in our capacity to make public choices. Rudderless, lacking an earned and grounded faith in ourselves, we can only drift increasingly helpless even the will to resist others in hopeless.
The Essay on Fairy Tales as Moral Lessons
Tales as Moral Lessons When most people think of fairy tales, they usually imagine a beautiful princess that needs to be rescued, a valiant prince that rescues her and a happily ever after involving a wedding between the prince and princess. People imagine monsters and witches, but sometimes, when they read a fairy tale they may notice an underlying moral to the story that teaches us to do good ...
The economy and society have pushed families to the limit, which made child abuse more likely. If our society is to come to grips with the problem that is over powering our homes, it must be exposed. Once all is exposed, the understanding of child abuse is truly supported. Childhood should be ones happy memory of playing outside in the sun with the little kids on their street; not living each day a nightmare and hiding deep within their soul, scared of what they might turn into.
