Have you ever wondered in an emergency situation as you are lying there on your death bed or in critical condition unable to make conscious decisions, who would give consent for your medical treatment? In emergency situations, there may be insufficient time for potential research participants to engage in the usual informed consent process. Furthermore, the emergency situation may impair the ability of potential participants and their representatives to make informed decisions because of anxiety, pain, or impaired consciousness. Waiting on consent could mean life or death. For a patient to be considered legally informed, the informed consent requires a patient to have reasonable knowledge of the procedure to be performed as well as some understanding of the nature of the risks involved in the procedure.
They need to be aware of the diagnosis, which should include an understanding of any steps taken to determine the diagnosis. Also they must know the nature of the proposed treatment, including the potential risks of the treatment and the probability of success. For some this is a huge factor when making a decision. One must medically recognized alternative measures relating to diagnosis or treatment and also the consequences of the decision they make to decline or refuse the treatment. The role of the physician is to talk to the patient themselves, rather than a representative, nurse, or other related health care professional. They must inform the patient of the diagnosis and the nature and the purpose of the treatment or procedure. The physician must be able to list the benefits along with any of the risks of the treatment plan. There also must be an alternative to the proposed treatment or procedure. Alternatives should be discussed regardless of their cost and regardless of whether they will likely be covered by the patient’s health insurance along with the risk of the alternative treatment.
The Research paper on Informed Decision Surgery Risks Make
... the surgery and allow her to make an informed decision. However, because the physician mentioned that globally things ... to a concrete decision. Thus, if he informs her of the risks and she postpones it she risks the disease getting ... measured highly when taking into account the treatment of a patient. Support should always be available in any ... consequences to something that is routine procedure.
Lastly the physician must let the patient know the risks and benefits of not receiving or undergoing any treatment or procedure. The role of the Patients is they must listen to the physician and should ask questions of the physician if they do not understand, or if they would like more detailed information. A mentally disabled person has an appointed guardian authorized to make medical decisions, informed consent, for that individual. Medical providers need to make sure that when they obtain informed consent for incompetent individuals, they have obtained it from the correct person or persons. A parents can give informed consent for treatment for their minor children In the event that you become unable to take in information and make your own wishes known, another person may be asked to take part in the process of informed consent. There are several ways that person can be chosen.
Many states have passed family agency acts that choose which family members (in a listed order of priority) may act on behalf of a person who cannot speak for her or himself. This option may be used if you don’t have an advance directive or court-appointed proxy. Depending on your family situation and which state you are in, that person may be your legal guardian, spouse, parent, child, sibling, or other relative. The other route is a court-appointed surrogate or proxy. This is someone a judge chooses to make medical decisions for you. If you become unable to make decisions for yourself, someone else such as the doctor, facility, a friend, or a family member may ask the court to appoint someone to do it for you. This process varies from state to state.
The Research paper on Consent to medical treatment medical law
... to medical treatment. The consent should be from the person but not any person because the law views a competence adult as a person who can make ... Alaisdair Maclean . (2009). The legal regulation of consent – chapter 5 from Autonomy, informed consent and medical law by Alaisdair Maclean (2009). Jackson E. ...
In the event of an emergency, a person is unconscious and in danger of death or other serious outcome if medical care is not given right away, informed consent may not be required before treatment. If those who are giving treatment know that the patient has an advance directive refusing the care, the treatment may not be given. If those treating the person know that he or she has an advance directive that appoints someone else to make decisions, that person may be called for informed consent if there is time. But in general, emergency situations don’t allow much time to check on advance directives. So as you can see consent is a huge part of the medical field. Most of the time consent is in written form, but in certain cases it might be verbal. Without consent a doctor or any other personal cannot do any procedure or treatment unless they deem its medical emergency and it is life or death for the patient.
Reference Page
acutecareresearch.org/informed-consent-and-emergencies
www.fda.gov
www.turner-white.com/pdf/hp_mar99_emergmed.
