International Politics: the incompetence of the U.N. There happen to be many controversies in the international politics during past several decades. It appears to be certain that some organizations, in our case one of the most powerful organizations of the world, the United Nations fail to perform their tasks quiet properly. This appears to be considered by people of the World due to various reasons. This research is going to focus on these reasons and causes and effects of the reasons for such incompetence. We are going to present some facts concerning the issue of incompetence of the United Nations in this research.
The main in competences can be seen by taking a closer look at the results of some actions taken by the investigated organization. Some of the outcomes of the actions taken by U.N. contradict the original plans of the organization and its actual reason for existence. Lets start the research by defining the U.N.s purpose and continue it with presenting the facts and outcomes of the actions taken by the U.N. as a peace creator. United Nations is an organization that had been established in 1945, by willing of many countries that suffered from wars. Main tasks of the newly established organization were to keep and reinforce peace in the world, maintain the security for countries thought the world, and develop serious cooperation between countries, in order to solve their problems including internal as well as international. World needed the organization like this, due to unstable situation in some regions and the constant threat of military or war activities by some extreme countries.
The Essay on Third World Countries
World' Countries today? Who should be held responsible for these problems? Why? What has Canada done to help 'Third World Countries'? There has always been a dominant country in the world that sets the economic standard throughout powerful countries. Canada has always been a top rated economic country, usually behind the United States and other large Commonwealth countries. Starting back in the ...
The organization was established to try to keep the peace worldwide with the lowest possible military actions involved. The main principles of United Nations were: The principle of the sovereign equality of its members. Sovereign does not mean total independence and isolation of a state. It means that events happened in some states, threatened international peace and security, and they are no longer a subject of their internal affairs, but rather they are subject of U.N. activity, and therefore it is not an intervention. The principle of non-practicing the power and not threatening with the power the other countries as well. The articles 42-47, 52 of the U.N.
Statute describe the cases of legal practice of armament: a) in case of self-defense; b) under decision of Security Council . The principle of inviolability of states boarders. The principle of territory integrity of the states. The principle of peaceful solving of the international quarrels. The article 33 of the U.N.s Statute says that states must try to solve their quarrels by negotiations, intermediation, conciliation, arbitrage or other peaceful manner actions on their choice. The principle of non-intervention to the internal affairs of other states.
Boutros-Ghali, the U.N.s Secretary-General in 1994 declared: Peacekeeping is a U.N. invention. Peacekeeping emerged in the post-Cold War period as the most prominent U.N. activity. The organization suddenly started becoming the centre of international efforts to deal with unresolved problems of the past decades as well as the array of present and future issues. Between 1988 and 1993, more than a dozen new peacekeeping operations were launched, it had costed around $3 billion to the U.N. Governments have come under increasing scrutiny and criticism for failure to adhere to a growing body of international standards in areas formerly considered purely internal matters, for instance, human rights and political freedom.
However, while the worlds peoples opinion is more likely aimed to consider intervention, it is also increasingly distrustful about military intervention in practice except in extreme cases, such as the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Many governments have attempted to square this circle by calling on the United Nations as the legitimising authority for intervention. This approach is especially useful when dealing with not solely political or military crises, but with those where a serious humanitarian emergency exists. Here the United Nations has the potential to accomplish things no other international organization or ad hoc coalition can do. In theory, at least, it can deal with modern plagues, assist refugees, and help countries cope with natural disasters. However many of these emergencies reflect the failure of governing institutions to address effectively the hidden in deep veil economic and political problems. These problems, natural and manmade, have recently and increasingly overlapped, creating complex emergencies, which have sometimes overtaxed U.N.
The Term Paper on Should the United Nations Security Council Be Reformed
The reform of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has been of interest for a number of years and remains a significant topic. As one of the six principal organs of the United Nations, the Security Council is responsible for maintaining international peace and security (UN Charter: art. 24. 1). Over the years, the Security Council has worked to achieve their primary purpose of upholding ...
competence and capability. Somalia (1993), Bosnia (1994-95), and Rwanda (1994) were just several of the dramatic examples of this development. The expansion of U.N. peacekeeping or peace enforcement activities has caused the United Nations to run into trouble. The question of the use of military force by the United Nations, both with respect to competence and to legitimacy, has not been fully answered, as was shown in Somalia and Bosnia. The U.N.
failed to perform their tasks due to various reasons that will be upraised further in the research. But, as any living object, U.N. needs means for existence. And therefore it implicitly depends on countries supporting it. Currently the world is shocked about incompetence of U.N. concerning situation in Iraq.
In summer 2002 Iraq blamed the United States for the failure of the latest round of negotiations in Vienna with the United Nations, saying Washington was imposing its will on the U.N. Security Council by insisting only on the return of U.N. weapons inspectors to Iraq. Foreign Minister Naji Sabri said that since the first round of Iraq-U.N. negotiations in March that year, Baghdad had presented a batch of questions for the Security Council to answer. He added, during this round of dialogue, U.N.s Secretary General Kofi Annan informed us that he could not get the answers for Iraqs questions from the Security Council, and admitted that we had the right to put forward those questions. The aim of the dialogue, therefore, was basically to bring the viewpoints of the two parties closer together. There is American pressure to hamper bids to bring the viewpoints closer.
The Essay on United States Iraq Resolution Nations
I make no assert ations as to the validity of any of the information contained in this document. On the eighth of November 2002, the United Nations security council, consisting of the five permanent members ^aEUR" The United States, United Kingdom, Russia, China and France - and the rotating member states of Bulgaria, Cameroon, Colombia, Guinea, Ireland, Mauritius, Mexico, Norway, Singapore and ...
This is done through Hans Blix (head of the U.N. commission on weapons inspections in Iraq) who is refusing to start a constructive dialogue on what has been achieved by Iraq in the past, Sabri added. Without clearing what has been achieved during the past period, that is to say what Iraq has carried out and what the U.N. thinks that Iraq is yet to carry out, and without agreeing on a means to resolve them, we cannot move forward, he concluded. Looking at the numbers of negotiations made by U.N., Iraq and US during that period, we can see that none of the sides had found and had been willing to reach compromise in their problem. And the United Nations looked like a ball jumping from one side to another. However, if U.N.
would take more serious action in reaching their decisions in that case, the war and all disasters, like human lives being ended, destroying cultural legacy and history values, would possibly have been avoided. In 1990 the United Nations imposed a trade embargo, including an abolition to oil exports upon Iraq. It was planning originally to punish Iraq for its invasion to Kuwait and also to prevent it from importing technology make weapons. In 1996 the United Nations allowed Iraq to sell limited stocks of oil in order to purchase essential goods Under U.N. supervision. But as it was finally discovered, this supervision was not that good as it planed to be. Hans von Sponeck (the U.N.s official ), who spent much time in the field during his 17-month tenure in Iraq, found that the civilian population was being punished for something it never had done. He also learned that U.N.s officials were very little interested in his reports of the human costs of sanctions. Several times they linked them to Iraqi propaganda.
And now we can see that the U.N.s Oil for food program returned to the production of weapons and palaces for Saddam and starvation for his people. The level of corruption in the program clearly ran into the billions of dollars. Now we can only think about what had prevented the United Nations handle the job. The case 1 for limiting U.N. control over the future of Iraq is the Roland 2 Frances best man-portable air defence w.
The Essay on United States Iraq Administration Nations
The greatest threat to the United States of America lies not in the weapons of mass destruction being harvested in poor countries such as Iraq, but in the arrogance of her own government. For a year following the attacks on September 11 2001, the Bush administration has been making war-like speeches against countries such as Iraq, North Korea, and Pakistan concerning their 'build up of weapons of ...
