“Nationalism is an infantile disease, the measles of mankind.” [Albert Einstein] Nationalism, to a far extent, can eat away and setback mankind, like a disease. When asked should either nationalism or internationalism be promoted in society, the following questions must be answered: How does a nation handle conflict? Are peoples subjugated? What are the consequences of nations being overly dependant on others? The answers to these questions are the driving force behind the ideologies of Internationalism and Nationalism. Internationalism is a focus on betterment of oneself while benefiting the world, and stresses cooperation and teamwork. Positives of internationalism include improved aid and development throughout the world, increased cooperation though collective security as well as increased growth through economic alliances.
Conversely, internationalism can include a loss of sovereignty and independence that signals a turning away from self-sufficiency. International agreements may not always be honored, and it may leave a nation without the mutual defense it had counted upon. On the other side of the continuum lies nationalism, a belief that prioritizes one’s nation over others, while other nations may benefit, it is indirect, unlike internationalism. Nationalism creates a unified society with one national identity, and leads to patriotism that can be brought about by a strong military presence. Nationalism stresses the importance of remaining independent and sovereign, but nations that discourage trade with other nations through tariffs can suffer economically. Also nationalistic territorial expansion tends to ignore the cultural needs of other nations, and this can lead to the subjugation of a cultural group. Upon analysis, this remains a complex issue, but the best way to cooperate between nations stems from effective use of internationalism. With internationalism, free trade can directly benefit a nations economy, and diplomatic negotiations before action in conflict mediation ensure that the political independence of a nation is not violated.
The Term Paper on Nations And Nationalism Nation Modern State
The question of the continued power of nationalism in the modern world has long been the subject of debate amongst sociologists. One could define nationalism as a set of beliefs which asserts that a particular community of people constitutes an actual or potential nation, or desire for an advancement of that nation and projection of its virtues and powers. In a world of interdependence, trade ...
The internationalist ideology supports methods of collective security, as was the case in the Persian-Gulf war. In 1990, Saddam Hussein accused the country of Kuwait of stealing oil from the Rumain oil fields, and invaded them. The United Nations set a deadline of January 15th, 1991 for all Iraqi forces to be removed from Kuwait. Hussein ignored the deadline, and by February 1991, 500,000 allied ground, air and naval troops from United States, Saudi Arabia, Great Britain, France, Egypt and Syria faced off against the Iraqi force of 54,000. Air and land strikes continued until March 3rd, when Iraqi Representatives agreed to remove their troops, pay for the damages, and destroy weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles with a range greater than 150 kilometers.
Also, the UN established the United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observation Mission. (UNIKOM) This group was established to monitor the demilitarized zone between Kuwait and Iraqi borders. Another group, the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM), was created to make sure Iraq followed all terms and conditions outlined in Resolution 687, which stated that Iraq had to destroy all weapons of mass destruction, chemical and biological weapons, and ballistic missiles. UNSCOM had the authority to destroy or render useless all weapons outlined in Resolution 687. These tough sanctions were international efforts to try and stifle Iraq’s ability to wage war.
Another example of achieving collective security through internationalist policies is the Kosovo peacekeeping mission. Of the two million people living in Kosovo, 90% are Muslims and 10% are Serbs. The Muslims had been demanding independence for the passed few years, but Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milosovic had been crushing them down by getting the Serb population to gang-rape Muslim women and torture Muslim men to death. The world condemned Serb atrocities, but Milosovic disregarded this and kept up this brutal behavior. When the situation worsened, NATO decided it was time to step in. NATO told Milosovic that air strikes would ensue if he did not come to terms and sign the agreement that was to be arranged in France by March 24th, 1999. He didn’t, so NATO began air strikes on civil and military targets all over Yugoslavia, mostly upon oil refineries, TV stations, ammunition stores, airfields and military installations. These strikes continued for 79 days, but atrocities were still continuing during this time, causing many Muslims to seek refuge in Albania and Macedonia. On the 79th day, Milosovic gave in, and NATO suspended its bombing. He agreed to the peace plan, and had Serb troops withdrawn. The “Operation Joint Guardian” followed. This was a plan to return and rehabilitate all Kosovo refuges back to Kosovo.
The Essay on Future Of Islam People Muslims Religion
The Future of Islam When first approached with the question "what the future of Islam is?" my mind raced around many places and had lots of different thoughts. I had no clue what the future of this religion would be I thought there are people for the American Gov. who are being payed a lot of money to figure this out and I don't think they even know. So I decided to do research to figure out what ...
Nationalism can lead to the subjugation of minorities, as was shown in the early colonial days leading up to the 20th century. During this time, many European countries had colonies in Africa, and were trying to religiously assimilate the citizens of these colonies. While some of the citizens of Africa accepted this, many did not. One man, John Chavafambira, accepted Christianity as a youngster, but as he grew older, opposed it. He, along with many others, was angry that the European people took their lands and forced them to work on it, that European priests opposed the use of Native medicines, and Native doctors all together. Among John’s fellow kraal, there was widespread animosity towards Christianity. Slowly, they began turning away from the Europeans and Christianity and back towards their original religion. As time passed, they resumed their traditional ways, but the Europeans were wrong to have forced their religion on the African peoples. This type of nationalism leads to the unwanted assimilation of people, which causes needless turmoil.
Nationalism can lead to intolerance and can result in violence when facing a conflict. This is illustrated in the Amritsar Massacre. During 1919, many Punjab soldier returned to their homeland only to find that they were no longer treated as equal allies, but at “natives.” The act that pushed the Punjab people over the edge was when the British put the Rowlatt Acts into place. This gave British more power over the citizens of India. When Ghandhi returned to Africa, he commanded that his people disobey the Rowlatt acts, and that he would do the same. He was then arrested and deported. People gathered to protest his deportion, and General Dyer marched 50 troops in to restore order. Although the protest had quieted down and there was no more disorder, Dyer ordered that the soldiers open fire on a group of 10,000 attending a religious festival. The troops killed 400 and injured upwards of 1200. Britain’s nationalist policies directly resulted in the violence when faced with peaceful protesters.
The Essay on American Economy People European Mexican
American Economy In Today's World Essay, Research American Economy In Today's World American Economy in Today's World It is often wondered how the superpowers achieved their position of dominance. According to time magazine, to be a superpower, a nation needs to have a strong economy, an overpowering military, immense international political power, and related to this, a strong national ideology. ...
Internationalism sometimes fails when the agreements are loosely held together, with no real intent of support behind it. An example of this is the Munich Pact of 1938. On September 29th and 30th, Chamberlain, Daladier, Hitler, and Mussolini, leaders of Britain, France, Germany and Italy respectively, met to discuss the appeasement of Italy and Germany. At this pact, France and Britain gave in to most of Hitler’s demands, as they did not want another World War on their hands. One of the key points of this pact was the Czechoslovakia was to remain independent. But in March of 1939, Hitler went in, invaded and dismembered Czechoslovakia anyway. None of the other parties involved in the Munich pact took any action. World War II ensued about a year later. This goes to show that Internationalism has its weaknesses when countries fail to follow through with their agreements.
