Intrabusiness Relationship – Business Law In order to understand whether Mr. Williams decision not to renew the contract can be considered a sexual harassment it is important to provide the definition of sexual harassment at the workplace. Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination, unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, visual, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. What concerns the relationships between Mr. Williams and Elma, it is given that Elma was the live-in girlfriend of Mr. Williams, the principal owner of ACE Inc. However, there were no unwelcome sexual advances or requests for sexual favors, because Elma was a girlfriend and they were living together. This is also not the case of rape or sexual assault.
The contract between ACE Inc and Elma was for one year, and Elma was to be paid in monthly installments. Mr. Williams didn’t force Elma to do certain sexual favors to continue working. Moreover, it is not illegal to have consensual sexual relations with employees by their consent. Sexual relationships with employees are rather of ethical nature, if they are not a form of sex discrimination, constituting unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, visual, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. The fact of living together cannot be considered criminal in nature. There were also no unwanted sexual advances. In addition, the decision to renew or not to renew the contract was done at the end of the contract.
The Term Paper on Sexual Harassment: Review of Contemporary Literature on Sexual Harassment
The Women’s National Law Center defines sexual harassment as a form of sexual discrimination which includes unwelcome advances, propositions involving sexual favors and verbal or physical conduct of sexual behavior or innuendo. It is very significant that the term is very clearly and broadly qualified to include the slightest of misconduct with such nature. Recall that for the longest time sexual ...
The decision to renew or not is solely in Mr. Williams competence and can be done in accordance with his own feelings or considerations. In such a way, what has become clear from all these facts, is that the fact that at the end of the contract, Mr. Williams decision not to renew the contract because he and Elma broke up, cannot allow Elma maintaining a case for sexual harassment. Although Elma may decide to make some allegations against Mr. Williams, so far it will be very difficult to find anything to substantiate them..
