Who wonder if this statement was really true, and yes, nothing remains the same. Everybody faces changes in life. Change of class in school, moving house, progressing from a primary student to a high school student, and the loss of loved ones. When you ask someone, “Is change a Good Thing?” Many people would say “no.” As humans, we tend to focus on all the negative changes that happen to us. We do not go deep into these changes and ask ourselves whether there is another side to them. Change has been conveyed as a multidimensional factor of life, with positive and negative influences, as shown by the film Once Upon a Time in Cabramatta (OUATIC) by Bernadette Lim and the poem The Door by Miroslav Holub. Change is a tornado: it comes without warning and can pass by without interference, or can cause irreversible damage. A majority people believe that tornado is a synonym for change. In OUATIC John Newman states the Vietnamese ought to be deported, “The one thing they fear is deportation back to the jungles of Vietnam, because that’s where they belong”.
Newman symbolically labels the Vietnamese as uninhabited animals, signifying they cannot assimilate into civilised Australian civilization, and consequently, don’t fit into the Australian civilization. The point that Australia altered its policy and permitted refugees from Vietnam, eliminating the White Australia policy started a colossal conversion in the social and cultural elements of Australia. He uses inclusive language “they” to additionally emphasise the Vietnamese are not Australian and shouldn’t be here. This directed to a change concerning the white Australians and the Vietnamese, affecting this tornado to come without a warning. The white Australians retreated in terms of their civilization. This change headed to a destructive progress – a regression – representing that change doesn’t constantly lead to a good change. Change can lead to positive and negative risk, The Door, Holub orders the person who reads to “Go and open the door”.
The Essay on The Changing Australian Voice
You are to create a representation of TWO of the poems studied in class and an explanation or rationale of your work. In this task you are to consider the values and assumptions underlying the voice in the poems and explore the effect of changing context on those values and assumptions. How you decide to represent these ideas on the page is entirely up to you, but you should consider the most ...
He likewise lists potential concerns, “darkness ticking, a hollow wind or nothing”, these represent a negative risk. “You might find a tree, a wood, a garden, a magic city” these represent a positive change. Through this, it is evident that change can have a positive or negative risks, which can also, became a better option, or affect a destructive downfall. The Door supports people to change, even if it leads to something bigger “a tree, a wood” or perhaps finishes worse than it first started with or stay the same, “a hollow wind, nothing”. OUATIC shows the destructive concerns of change, which cause the families to break up, representing change can became a negative risk. The difference amongst both text shows that change can and cannot lead to a positive negative consequence. Both OUATIC and The Door show the risk of change. The change in OUATIC was damaging, The Door also shows that this can also led badly but orders the reader to search for a modification even though it might not be a joy able experience. We establish that modifications aren’t constantly for the better, but can really cause relapse.
