PJ: Hey Bob. Why are you all dressed up? Bob: Well I just got back from church. PJ: When are you going to give up on that God thing? Bob: Never. Infact I bet you $10 that I can prove the existence of god. Bob: Ok, the first thing you need to understand is the PSR. Bob: It?s the Principle of Sufficient Reason. It states every event has a cause. i.e. you Bob: The next thing you have to understand is the difference between something being contingent or necessary. A contingent being doesn?t explain itself. It depends on something else for it?s existence. Where as a necessary being explains its own existence and doesn?t depend on anything to exist. For example, a chair is something that is contingent, because it was made by someone. PJ: I don?t see what this has to do with God. Bob: You need to understand the basics before I can prove God?s existence to you. Bob: The Cosmological argument is one of the oldest and best arguments around and will 1. The universe exists and is contingent. 2. Thus, the universe relies/depends on something else for it?s existence. 3. This something else is either a necessary being or a contingent being. 4. Suppose it is contingent, the it depends on something else.
ad infinitum 5. An infinite regress of explanation violates the PSR. An example of this one is the old billiard ball example. If a ball goes into a pocket you ask what caused it. The answer is the ball that hit it before, and the ball that hit the one before it. See the infinite regression will 6. Thus, this something must be a necessary being. PJ: Well I?m not sure about that. You are committing the part of a whole fallacy. Just because the universe is made up of contingent things doesn?t make it contingent. Bob: Good point. But, what else could it be. The only other option is saying the universe Bob: Lets me a thought experiment to convey why not. Imagine you are walking along in the forest and you come across a translucent sphere six feet in diameter. You try and move it, but you can?t. You try and puncture it, but again you can?t affect it. So you ask me where it came from and I tell you that it?s always been here. It doesn?t depend on anything and there for it is necessary. I don?t know about you but I think that sounds ridiculous. Now enlarge the sphere to the size of the universe. You can fill it with stars and planets and space. But it still sounds ridiculous. PJ: Ok you?ve convinced me that the universe isn?t necessary, but what if the universe is just a brute fact.
The Essay on Does God Exist Argument Universe Existence
The Three Most Popular Arguments For The Existence Of God The Ontological Argument One of the most important attempts to demonstrate the existence of God is the ontological argument of Saint Anselm, an 11 th-century theologian. Anselm's argument maintains that God, defined as the greatest being that can be conceived, must exist, since a being that does not exist would by virtue of that fact lack ...
What if it is just here and it is just a fact. Bob: Well that makes me worry a little bit. If that is true then this argument doesn?t hold Bob: I?m not going to give up yet. I?ve got a better and older argument. This one is called the Ontological argument. But first you need more basics. You need to understand existence in reality and existence in understanding. You also need to understand the BGC. Bob: You exist in reality and in understanding. Where as Zeus the Greek god exists in understanding but not in reality. And a 4 sided triangle doesn?t exist in either. You get it? Bob: The BGC stands for the ?Being than which none greater can be conceived?. Ok now 1. Suppose that the BGC doesn?t exist in reality. 2. Never the less, the BGC is conceivable. 3. The BGC would be greater if it existed in reality. 4. Ergo, a being greater than the BGC is conceivable. 6. Line #1 is false and the BGC does exist in reality. PJ: Wow that is argument almost proves the existence if God. PJ: I said almost. You see your problem in the structure of the argument. You see you can prove way too much with this line are argument. Lets place something in the place of the BGC. The Island than which none greater can be conceived.
The Essay on Reflections on Perception of Reality
I have always believed in what I saw, what I heard, and what I experienced. As these elements play a significant role of perceiving the world around me, it is very hard to distrust the reality. However, it was not a long ago that I began to ponder about this issue more profoundly. What do I really perceive? Could I precisely explain our perception without the help of science? As I spend more time ...
The IGC. PJ: 1.Suppose that the IGC doesn?t exist in reality. 2. Never the less, the IGC is conceivable. 3. The IGC would be greater if it existed in reality. 4. Ergo, an island greater than the IGC is conceivable. 6. Line #1 is false and the IGC does exist in reality. Now I?m not sure about you, but I find an IGC foolish and impossible. Bob: Ok well an island can always be improved on. But the BGC is unique. PJ: I?ll buy that. But existence doesn?t make something any better. It?s not a describing thing. Its not a quality. Therefore it can?t make something any greater. I?ll give you an example. Imagine you want a bottle of wine. And you tell your friends to pick up a bottle of 1987 Napa Valley red, plus it has to be from Robert Mondoby woodbridge edition, oh yea by the way could it also exist. You see that doesn?t make sense. Bob: Ok I?ll make my last revision. Lets say instead of proving that the BGC is better if it exists. Then lets say that BGC is better if it is necessary. 1. Suppose that the BGC doesn?t exist in reality. 2. Then it doesn?t have necessary existence. 3. Never the less the BGC is conceivable. 4. The BGC would be greater if it had necessary existence. 5. Therefore a being greater than the BGC is conceivable. 7. Line #1 is false and the BGC exists in reality. PJ: Sorry buddy. I still believe that the Universe is a brute fact. But I?ll tell you what. For trying so hard and putting up some great arguments, I?ll buy you lunch. As you can see. I believe that the universe is a brute fact, but I also believe in God. I just haven?t found an argument that has convinced me yet.
