Jacksonian Democrats viewed themselves as guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty and equality of economic opportunity. However their view of themselves wasn’t how they actually were. While they did feel strongly about the common man and the constitution they were also concerned with their own interests which are shown in the Indian Removal. The Jacksonians were overall what they thought of themselves to be but they did have some other intentions.
The Jacksonians had a strict interpretation of the constitution and wanted to follow it as much as they could. This is shown in Jackson’s veto of the national bank. Jackson thought that bank was unconstitutional and only made the rich richer. As he says in his veto message “I can perceive none of these modifications…to make it compatible with justice, with sound policy, or with the Constitution of our country”. Rich foreigners held most of the stock in the bank which hurt the country as he says “more than a fourth part of the stock is held by foreigners” making the bank unconstitutional. The Jacksonians were concerned with the common man and the constitution. The national bank only took from the common man and gave more to the rich.
Political democracy was also what Jacksonian Democrats considered themselves to be guardians of. Before the Jacksonians only white land owning men were able to vote but when Jackson became president he granted suffrage to all white men. This made the common people happy and made the people better as a whole. As Harriet Martineau said in Society in America “The striking effect upon a stranger of witnessing, for the first time, the absence of poverty, of gross ignorance, of all servility, of all insolence of manner cannot be exaggerated in description”. Giving suffrage to all white men made them feel better about their standing in society and got them involved in national issues. Martineau said in the report “I had seen every man in the towns and independent citizen; every man in the country a landowner”. The Jacksonians increased Democracy and gave the common man more significance which had a positive outcome on the country proving them to be guardians of political democracy.
The Essay on Man In Black People World Rich
MAN IN BLACKLY JOHNNY CASH The interpretation of Man in Black as seen by Johnny Cash, is to make a statement to the world why you never see bright colors on his back. He was making a statement about the variety of people that are struggling in life in some way. For example, people that are poor, beaten down, hopeless, hungry, prisoners that have long paid their crime, for those who have never ...
While the Jacksonian Democrats were guardians for the common people sometimes their own interests overpowered those of the people. The Jacksonians go against individual liberty because of this with the Indian Removal. Jackson wanted all of the Indians to move west to make room for white settlers. Jacksonians wanted to take the Indians land and force them out. The Cherokee tribe went to the Supreme Court to ask for to keep their land. While the court agreed Jackson did not and ended up making them move anyway.
This was a direct act against individual liberty and was done because Jackson did not like the Indians and wanted them out. However while the Jacksonians were not guardians here they were when it came to the common man. As George Henry Evans says in “The Working Men’s Declaration of Independence” “But when a long train of abuses and usurpations…of one class of society…it is their right it is their duty to use every constitutional means to reform the abuses of such a government”. Jacksonians want to protect liberty of the common man and they have intentions of doing so. The Jacksonians did value individual liberty but when their own interests intervened they ignored it and did what they wanted to do regardless.
Jacksonian Democrats were also guardians of economic opportunity and thought everyone should have a chance to become wealthy. The Whigs thought that only wealthy men should be able to open businesses but Jacksonians were for the common man. As it says in Chief Justice Roger B. Taney’s opinion in Supreme Court case “While the right of private property are sacredly guarded, we must not forget, that the community also have rights, and that happiness and well-being of every citizen depends on their faithful preservation”. Jacksonians believed that everyone deserved a chance economically and they were truly guardians of economic opportunity.
The Essay on Jacksonian Democrats Equality Of Economic Opportunity
... Zoo Patrol) Jacksonian Democrats viewed themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity. In ... do you agree with the Jacksonian's view of themselves. Unlike previous presidents, Andrew Jackson represented the common men. He and his followers did ...
The Jacksonian Democrats were guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty and economic opportunity although sometimes their own interests got in the way. They vetoed the bank, gave suffrage to all white men, protected the common man and gave all men economic opportunity. However they did ignore liberty when dealing with the Indians because they wanted them out of the country. Although the Jacksonian Democrats weren’t as perfect as they thought they were they were guardians of the common man and what he stood for including the Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty and economic opportunity.
