Donne John. The Canonization. Twentieth Century Views: John Donne. Ed. Helen Gardner. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Prentice – Hall, INC.,1962 Brooks finds the poem a parody of Christian sainthood taking the major themes of the poem religion and love very seriously and using them in an inevitable paradox. The person to whom Donne speaks in the beginning is a friend who epitomizes the world which the lovers have renounced. A world in which their love may seem most absurd, but cares little for the wars and lawsuits and instead only for the love of each other. The love of the two lovers is viewed as saintly and paradoxically when they achieve a more intense world by becoming hermits and gaining the world in each other and becoming the most worldly of all. Peck, John. How To Study A Poet.
London: Macmillan Publishers LTD, 1988. Peck finds love to be the central opposition of the poem with the rest of the worldly cares dismissed. To display their love the usage of flies and tapers creates a metaphor for the relationship existing between them. Conceits also play a role in comparing their love and relating their love to other items (phoenix and urn).
The usage of the conceit is to make the reader realize how wide and varied the world is. Peck views that love remains central throughout the poem by using poetic cleverness.
As well as love remaining central, so do the saintly views of the lovers. In their love they are to be worshipped and to provide a pattern for the world view, they are to inspire the world. Unger, Leonard. Donnes Poetry and Modern Criticism. Poetry Criticism, Vol. 1, pp.
The Essay on Love In Carl Sandburgs Poems
Love in Carl Sandburg's Poems Love is one of the most frequently deployed themes in poetry, and it is understandable people are more willing to read and think about something that concerns them and affects their personal well being rather than something abstract. Love comes in different appearances as we look at different poets works, each of them has unique style and conceptualization, and Carl ...
131-136. Unger describes the poem as proceeding form the central contrast of two main attitudes: that of the world and that of the lover. Donne is aware of the attitudes as being in conflict and is opposing one to the other. He believes that the canonized lovers legends arent fit for a hearse or a tomb, but will be fit for verse. Wit, playing a role in the poem, results from a complexity of attitudes, as does the apostrophe in the first stanza, exaggerations and rhetorical questions of the second. Halpen finds that Donne does create an incomprehensible poem of eros, but yet produces it as such.
Which is represented between the second and third stanzas. Love of the poem bestows a negative environment of not-love. The figures of love are seen as a symbolic medium of communication which compensate for the difference in the social class system. However love and marriage are a utopian denial, according to Halpen, in the pretty rooms. The rooms represent neither a utopian withdrawal from society or a pseudoaristocratic refusal to engage in business They are seen as possibly penalizing their social class of property and patronage for loving; yet it is from the ashes of their social death that the phoenix is born.
