What should the U. S. foreign policy be concerning military intervention in Kosovo NATO, comprised mostly of United States Forces, has determined the moral and ethical solution is to intervene and prevent the annihilation of a race of innocent people. NATO decided to intervene after Serbian military actions caused deaths of over 1, 500 Kosovar Albanians and forced 400, 000 people from their homes (NATO’s).
The overwhelming consensus is that Milosevic is a modern day Hitler that must be stopped before the conflict spreads beyond the Balkans. The public debate over Kosovo is not about whether the Serbs are doing ghastly things to the Kosovar’s; even isolationists admit that (War Fair).
The debate is about what action, if any, NATO and America should take. The isolationists believe that America, and NATO cannot impose a political solution because the problem is not, at base, political. Their viewpoint is that this problem is has been the norm for the people of this culture and in this region for centuries, and that outside involvement is unwarranted. So, why now is it imperative that the NATO and US intervene to stop the annihilation of a race The answer is simple, to stop history from repeating itself and to prevent escalation of this regional unrest. Milosevic is on a campaign to rid the region of non-Serbian people, much like Hitler’s intolerance for Jews, Catholics, and anyone else not fitting to the description of the master race. Milosevic wishes to cleanse the Balkans of any non-Orthodox Serbian.
The Essay on Why People Should Stop Smoking
You’ve all heard of the dangerous effects of smoking, but have you heard all the facts? 8.6 million People in the U.S. have at least one serious illness caused by smoking. That means that for every person who dies of a smoking-related disease, there are 20 more people who suffer from at least one serious illness associated with smoking (General Smoking Facts). Smoking is one of the greatest causes ...
The genocidal methods used by Milosevic, consisting of large-scale destruction and hatred, are chillingly similar to the methods used in Nazi Germany, under the leadership of Hitler. The result of: over one million people driven from their homes by brutal methods of killing, rape, burning and looting of their villages (Hehir).
Therefore the question of why NATO forces are involved in the Balkans is answered by looking at recent historical events. We paid an enormous price, in both dollars and lives, to stop Hitler’s war machine, grow for years, and systematically destroying millions of people. It is our responsibility as a world power to protect those that cannot protect themselves and to preserve basic human rights whenever possible. We want to be able to tell our children that we had not averted our eyes from a terrible atrocity – a matter of great importance to a continent haunted by the Holocaust (Perils).
NATO and America, having been duped by Hitler’s rouge of reaching diplomatic solutions, has learned a valuable lesson, and is applying military pressure to force a real resolution. Milosivec, applying the strategies of Hitler, has strategically held NATO at bay by keeping diplomatic channels open, all the while, continuing to carrying out genocidal raids. During World War II, Hitler proudly amassed a great army, had quietly annihilated hundreds of thousands of Jews, all while other countries attempted to reach a peaceful solution by diplomatic means. Milosevic has proven that he prescribes to the same deceptive tactics. Rather than scale back his military actions and genocide campaign, he increases the tempo while sitting at peace talks. There have been numerous news commentaries saying that the Balkans are “the New Berlin: the test of Western will” (Crisis).
America, Britain and France provided an airlift and a protection force for decades to protect the residents of Berlin from persecution during the cold war. A common assumption is that there will be a NATO protection force stationed in the Balkans for years to come. Politicians and journalists are quick to criticize the role of world peacekeeper, and the incredible costs associated with being the world’s policeman. Who is going to bear the burden and cost associated with protecting the basic human right of the world’s people Who better than the world powers British Prime Minister, Tony Blair was quotes as saying; This generation, it is suggested, will fight as passionately for human rights and self-determination as previous generations fought for colonial territory or national honour. It will wage war with moral purpose. It shall not rest, nor shall its sword sleep in its hand, until it has banished tyranny and all its works from the Earth – or at least from the sight of CNN cameras.
The Essay on How did war world 1 impact women
There are all types of information including lesson plans, articles and news. BBC origin is a British Broadcasting Corporation. Established in 1922,London. The founders of BBC are John Reith and George Villers. BBC purpose is to “enrich peopleʼs lives with programs and services that inform, educate and entertain.” The values of the source are that it has benefits of hindsight; this is because they ...
(Perils) Much like an older sibling is usually responsible for the safety and well being of the younger; the larger world powers should be responsible for the well being of other less advanced countries. Our history shows that we have given our most precious resources, our loved ones have given their lives throughout history to stave off injustice and tyranny. To do any less than confront Milosevic would diminish the sacrifices made by the hundreds of thousands of Americans. The question left for the global society is, will these types of inhumane and barbaric acts go unanswered and undefended. NATO is the by-product of World War II and the Cold War. It was intended to defend and protect the innocent, by carrying the Serbian attacks under the auspices of Albanian population protectors, it is actively doing what it was established to do.
Works Cited Beinart, Peter. “War Fair.” The New Republic 31 May 1999. 6 “Crisis in Kosovo.” Upfront Tonight Cable Television. CNBC.
3 Jun. 1999. Hehir, J. Bryan.
“Kosovo A War of Values and the Values of War.” America 180 (1999) i 177 1 NATO’s role in relation to the conflict in Kosovo.” Online posting. Internet. 11 May 1999 “The Perils of a Moral Imperative.” The New Statesman 128 (1999) i 4432 4 Works Consulted Judah, Tim. The Serbs: History, Myth and the Destruction of Yugoslavia. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1997 “Kosovo and Metohija.” Online posting. Internet.
The Term Paper on Second World War Members Of Nato
As the second World War was coming to an end, the representatives of some fifty nations met in San Francisco to sign the United Nations Charter in an attempt to unify many countries. The date was June 26 1946, and the countries that signed the charter did so to put themselves in a better position if any conflict were to arise in the future. During the time the charter was drawn and the treaty was ...
4 Jun. 1999 “Operation Joint Endeavour (IFOR – 20 Dec. 1995 – 20 Dec. 1996).” Online. Internet.
3 Jun 1999 Available: web “NATO’s Role in Bringing Peace to the Former Yugoslavia.” Online posting. NATO homepage. 4 Jun 1999 The New Republic, May 31, 1999 p 6 (1) TRB: War Fair. (Kosovo, intervention, and Africa) (Column) Peter Beinart. But why the interest in a relatively small Slavic region From April to July 1994 an estimated one million Rwandans (approximately one seventh of the population) were massacred in an unprecedented genocide. web >.
