Knighthood Knighthood and chivalry. The terms are often confused, and often pointlessly distinguished. The term knighthood comes from the English word knight (from Old English, servant or boy) while chivalry comes from the French che valerie, from chevalier or knight. In modern English, chivalry means the ideals, virtues, or characteristics of knights. But in actuality, the phrases ‘orders of chivalry’ and ‘orders of knighthood’ are essentially synonymous.
Succinctly, a knight was a professional soldier. Professional armies had replaced the old “citizens’ armies” of the distant past. This trend was reinforced by the appearance in the 8 th century of the stirrup, which made mounted men much more powerful and turned cavalry into the most important element of medieval armies. But being a mounted soldier was expensive, since it required enough income to buy and sustain a horse and the equipment (armor, weapons) to go with it. Thus, those who were too poor to provide this service became mere peasants, attached to the land. Knighthood was originally a professional association.
Its members are nobles (members of the great land-owning families) as well as small landholders, free men, craftsmen, etc. Therefore, knights were not necessarily nobles, nor were nobles necessarily knights. The noble class and the knightly class slowly came to merge from the late 12 th century onward. Nobles became knights with increasing frequency.
The Essay on Army Profession of Arms
The Profession of Arms Campaign is mandated by John M. McHugh, secretary of the Army, and Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, Army chief of staff, to assess the state of the Army and take a critical look at how the past decade of war has impacted the military and civilian workforce. “The overall objective of the campaign is for Soldiers and leaders to refine their understanding of what it means to be ...
The French prince (future king Louis VI) was knighted without the knowledge of his father who remained distrustful towards his son, Ironically enough every king succeeding this prince would be knighted before entering into the position. On the contrary to this not so balanced father, son relationship, heredity enters the knightly class in the 13 th century. The son of a knight is automatically a squire, thus making him eligible for knighthood on the basis of his ancestry. Men who were free provided military service, either personally or (if they were rich enough) using others’s ervices. Thus, a man who held his estate in knight’s fee owed service as a knight to his lord. A more sizeable vassal, when called by his liege, would summon his knights and form a contingent in his liege’s army.
In the late 13 th century, a decision of the Parliament in Paris forbade the count of Artois from making unfree men into knights without the king’s consent; interesting to note, the two men who had been so knighted were allowed to remain knights subject to the payment of a fine. Knighthood did not become a hereditary class in England, and instead the knightly class (those eligible to be knights) became the nucleus of the gentry. As a military institution, knighthood was on the wane from the late 13 th century on. The end of feudal society meant that sovereigns gained a monopoly on war-making, and the old form of military service owed to one’s immediate lord became obsolete. Kings still summoned their knights for wars, but increasingly they turned to other sources of manpower, namely mercenaries whose use became common in the 14 th century.
The war preparations of Henry V of England, which are well-documented, show how the king formed an army: he signed dozens of contracts (or indentures) with individuals who pledged to provide a specified number of men-at-arms and archers (usually 3 archers for each man-at-arm) at muster time. Because each institution tried to use the prestige of the previous one by imitating it, the term ‘order of knighthood’ has been passed on and is now used for modern awards and decorations which are neither orders nor composed of knights. In modern society, only a very few orders survive from the times of the Crusades, and most ‘orders of knighthood’ awarded by sovereigns or governments (such as the English Garter or the Spanish Golden Fleece) are, in spite of their historical connection, awards of merit. Sue tens, Ivo: Bibliographie Numismatique – Suppl ” event: Or dres et D’eco rations. Bruxelles, Cercle d’Etudes Numismatiques, Travaux: 1969, 1977 (2 vol.
The Essay on Man Of The Century Theodor Roosevelt
Man of the century, Theodore Roosevelt Theodore Roosevelt must be examined from the beginning since it is paramount to understand the man and his values, which is the foundation of his persona. Born naturally is a testament to the man and how he approached life and public office, tough, straightforward, and honest. Though this is a broad statement Theodore Roosevelt throughout his life overcame ...
).
