Krogstad: Villain or Victim? In the play A Dolls House, Henrik Ibsen effectively presents a sudden twist on characters by providing details in such a way that it changes the readers view on major characters as opposed to how he previously described them. For example Nora, the protagonist seems somewhat nave and immature at first; yet she eventually captures sympathy as the play reveals some of her secrets. The focus of this paper is about Krogstad. Although depicted as rude and, he deserves a degree of sympathy along with Nora. One reason why Krogstad ought to have the compassion he deserves is that he feels forced to take desperate measures. He is determined to do everything he can to save his employment and the welfare of his family and if necessary shall fight for [his] little job as if [he] were fighting for [his] life (#931).
Many years previously he was involved in a scandal that ruined his reputation. When Torvald, the new Bank manager decided to fire him, Krogstad realized that his family was threatened. Under such intense pressure he was able to blackmail Nora and Torvald. The case of Nora presents an interesting parallel. Realizing that her action would either let her father die with a broken heart or cause her husband to lose confidence as a father and provider of the family, Nora made the same mistake, making her offense no more and no worse than Krogstad is(#933).
This dilemma which contributed greatly to our support towards Nora is essentially the same reason why we should give Krogstad the same empathy. Aside from saving his children, Krogstad wanted to win back respectability that he used to have before his reputation was ruined (#931).
The Essay on Nara Antigone Nora Family Characters
Victor Gabriel 12/17/2002 period 1 Compare and Contrast Nora and Antigone "A Doll's House" and "Antigone" were plays from two different eras. Despite the fact that Sophocles' play was written in ancient Greece and Ibsen created his masterpiece in 19 th century Norway, both plays are meant to convey similar ideas. The main characters of both plays (Nora and Antigone) battle the surrounding them ...
He wanted to be able to live a normal, peaceful life again as evidenced by his words: I want to get on my feet again (#947).
His main motive was not to inflict trouble upon Nora and her family intentionally but was driven with a desire to lift himself from the mud the society had left him. In two instances he was abandoned by the ones he loved. After being left by Mrs. Linde for reasons of financial security, he was again abandoned by his wife later on in his married life leaving him with children to nurture on his own. He felt like the ground had slipped away from under [his] feet and made him a broken man clinging to the wreck of his life (#952).
This tragedy put him in a state of depression clouding his mind to make sound judgment in saving the only family he had left. Perhaps the most obvious turning point of our view towards Krogstad is at the end when he returned the IOU to the Helmers together with his regrets and apologies for what he has done (#960).
This act is a perfect display of a forgiving heart that vindicates his goodness as a man and father. After being reunited with Mrs. Linde and once again making his family complete, Krogstad finally realized his mistake and did whatever was necessary to correct it. Wronged and despised by society, the disheartened Krogstad struggled to pick up the pieces of his ruined life. As a single father, he tried to spare his family from an impending embarrassment.
These conditions led Krogstad to make undesirable actions. The play gives enough reasons to believe that Krogstad is not a vicious man with a criminal desire but rather a victim of the ruthlessness of society. Certainly, a level of compassion may be granted to this man. Like Nora, he also was a victim of such an awful predicament. Thus, consideration may be given to the words of Mrs. Linde: I know haw far a man can be driven by despair (#953)..
