Language Analysis Essay – Buying Class is a Bit Rich
There has recently been much debate in the community regarding foreign students buying their ways into school, in Susie O’Brien’s opinion piece “Buying class is a bit rich”, published on the 30th of August 2011, she contends that although cultural diversity within schools is important, Australian children students must be put before foreigners when it comes to education in Australia. O’Brien uses a reasoned tone to present a factual, but somewhat critical and biased argument, targeting principals of important concerned with foreign encroachment. Utilizing a wide variety of persuasive language techniques, the writer manages to effectively convey her arguments to the reader, convincing them to accept and agree with her point of view that big schools must put local Australian kids first, before they become “the poor cousins denied access to facilities and services open to foreign students”.
O’Brien’s article is obviously intended for an Australian audience, as she often appeals to Australian loyalty and pride. When couped with the use of inclusive language, O’brien attempts to coerce. Australians feel as though their kids are being robbed of their chances to enter major state schools, and that “these overseas kids are taking the prizes and kudos”. By including the reader, O’Brien is able to create a common purpose with the reader positioning them to share the same viewpoint as her. The writer also uses an appeal to the reader’s morals and values in order to exaggerate the problem by making it seem as though locals are completely “denied” from major schools due to “rich foreigners buy their way into our schools”. O’Brien does this with the purpose of forcing the reader into feeling morally obliged to accept the writer’s point of view that our local Australian kids are being deprived of the opportunity to go to state schools, as kids from other countries are being accepted as the more favourable choice. In doing so, O’brien positions readers to feel antagonistic towards wealthy foreigners, thereby persuading them to join her cause.
The Research paper on Taking Middle School Kids Back to the Adventurous World of Literature
The problem is that middle school students in Texas do not practice leisure reading creating a deficit in their reading skills as measured by the National Center for Education Statistics. Texas students showed an upsetting lack of improvement in reading on the Nation’s Report Card. In 2011, the average score of eighth-grade students in Texas was 261. This was lower than the average score of 264 ...
By appealing to the reader’s common sense through the work of rhetorical questions such as “”then shouldn’t they come first?”, the writer’s arguments are shown to be correct due to the self-evident answer of the question, and the reader is forced to supply the answer and see things from the writer’s perspective. The writer offers statistics from the Victorian Education Department, and backs up her arguments through the use of evidence from the studies of the University of Melbourne in 2010, to show that “there should be a limit to how many schools take in, and closer scrutiny, this makes readers think that the argument has been researched thoroughly and that O’brien isn’t just jumping to convlusions ”. O’Brien also bases her article on reason and logic, in order to make the reader feel as though they would be silly not to agree with her point of view as being radical. “if there’s room for overseas students at our most desirable state schools, then there’s room for more locals”. Thus, pressuring them to champion her viewpoint.
The writer launches a satirical attack on principals, labelling them as selfish and irresponsible and claiming that principals are barring Aussie kids from the opportunity to receive a good education from a major state school for the sake of receiving “a massive financial windfall of more than $30 million from overseas student’s fees”. This use of persuasive language encourages the reader to hold the same negative view on principals, making it easier to convince them of her point of view that some schools are unethically “treating international students as an alternative income stream”, and neglecting the educational needs of local Australian children. Accordingly, O’brien tries to portray principals as not working with Australia’s interests.
The Essay on Comparing And Contrasting Macbeth And Lady Macbeth
In the play Macbeth by William Shakespeare, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are depicted very differently and simply wanting kingship are among the few similarities. It is also interesting how the differences between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are caused by other differences in their traits, starting chain reactions of contrariety. Macbeth and Lady Macbeth both posses greedy and ambitious attributes. So ...
With the effective use of numerous persuasive language techniques, O’Brien manages to successfully convey her arguments and convince the reader of her point of view. By appealing to the loyalty of Australians and including the reader as part of this issue, while backing up her arguments with logic and evidence, O’Brien is able to convince the reader that international students are “shutting many local kids out” from our top state schools, and that no matter how beneficial foreigners from different cultures can be for these schools, we must make sure “the balance is right”, with our local Aussie kids as the first priority.
In ‘The Tragedy of Macbeth’, Shakespeare portrays many negative themes through the acts of Lady Macbeth which show the audience that she is real villain of this play. She seems to havee evil tendencies which separate her from the average individual. The key elements which make Lady Macbeth a villainous human being is her inhumane conscience and lack of compassion for her victims, her deceptiveness and her manipulation.Lady Macbeth is no more than an incarnation of evil. All of the acts she committed in the play were nothing else but for her selfish wants to gain power of the country and become queen. Her declaration that she would have ‘dash’d the brains out’ of her own baby if she were to become queen proves of her egotistical nature and heartless conscience. When she finds out the prophecies given to Macbeth to become king, she immediately acts to create a plan to murder the innocent and respected King
The Essay on Macbeth Lady King Duncan
"The greatest grieves are those we cause ourselves." This quote by Sophocles is saying that the things you most regret are the things you, yourself choose to do. If you do something to someone else, not only do you hurt another person, or other people, but also you hurt yourself. If someone else hurts you, you feel pain but not as much as having the guilt and pain of hurting other people walking ...
Duncan of Scotland. ‘Unsex me here’: Lady Macbeth is referring to her Feminine nature and she is trying to say “Take away my feminine nature and take away my feelings so I feel no regret to helping kill King Duncan!”; There can be no sympathy for Lady Macbeth, she meant all that she did and put herself in front of all people around her. The question of whether a person’s real state of mind is accurately reflected from there outside appearance is a key theme in Macbeth and Lady Macbeth is the primary culprit. She, as well as Macbeth show deceptive traits, pretending to be good whilst planning heinous crimes; ‘Look like the innocent flower, but be the serpent under’t’: She is telling Macbeth to look innocent, but under his fake appearance he is going to murder King Duncan. Though this false impression exposed by Lady Macbeth had kept her innocence, her effort of burying her guilt is what had driven her mad and ultimately leading to her death.