In class on Wednesday, we performed a series of tests on ourselves to determine what kind of learner we were. There were four tests that determined learning styles. In the first test I determined that I was a detailed or inductive thinker. This means that I work from smaller to larger, and examine the lesser points and details first. The second test found that I am a cooperative learner. This means that I work better with others in a group situation.
The third test found that I am a visual learner. Although I feel that I learn just as much through the other two, auditory and kinesthetic this was mostly correct. The fourth and final test determined that I am a right-brain dominant. This I agree with. I do feel that I pick up more material when the atmosphere is a bit less structured although I do need some structure to keep myself organized and focused. Overall I believe that these tests were accurate.
They seemed to have pinpointed most of my learning strategies and abilities. There are some where I feel that I use more than one style of learning, but this is a good basis for improvement. I can now try to focus more on these types of learning styles and see if they change the amount of material I pick up when studying. this paper is finished, i think i did well, but i don’t know. How about you? do you think i did well? well maybe i should ask someone else? what about that, what do you think about that? sound like fun. the beach is fun, do you like the beach? ? should i ask someone else? do they like the beach?.
The Essay on Creating Climates for Learning for Diverse Learners
In the case of Pon, it makes sense that his behavior and learning problems do stem from the fact that he is different from his peers. In his age group, it is usually the case that being different results to being discriminated against (Rogers, 2004). Rather than forcing the child to “fit in” with his classmates, it would be more appropriate to channel his differences to positive learning ...
