REACTION PAPER NO. 5: “LEVEL FIVE LEADERSHIP ” DONA BELLE B. SUVA 11 AUGUST 2004 I. SUMMARY Why is it that a few companies develop from an organization with good results as measured on the stock market to a great one? Jim Collins and his team selected 11 companies from more than 1400 that had been listed in the Fortune 500 from 1965 to 1995.
Each of the selected companies had mediocre results for 15 years and then went through a transition point. From that point they out- performed the market by at least 3 to 1 and sustained that performance for at least 15 years. Each of these was compared with companies in the same industry and about the same size. Using hundreds of interviews, they identified the key factors that enable a company to move from mediocre institutions to great institutions.
The comparison companies lacked these factors and failed to become great. Perhaps the most important component of the transition from good-to-great is what they called ‘Level 5 Leadership’, from leadership hierarchy so identified: Level 1 is a Highly Capable Individual who ‘makes productive contributions through talent, knowledge, skills and good work habits.’ Level 2 is a Contributing Team Member who ‘contributes individual capabilities to the achievement of group objectives and works effectively with others in a group setting.’ Level 3 is the Competent Manager who ‘organizes people and resources toward the effective and efficient pursuit of predetermined objectives.’ Level 4 is an Effective Leader who ‘catalyzes commitment to and vigorous pursuit of a clear and compelling vision, stimulating higher performance standards.’ Level 5 is the Executive who ‘builds enduring greatness through a paradoxical blend of personal humility and professional will.’ Every one of the good-to-great companies has level 5 leaders in the critical transition phase. None of the comparison companies did. These leaders are described as being timid and ferocious, shy and fearless and modest with a fierce, unwavering commitment to high standards. Level 5 leaders rely on instilling inspired standards and not inspiring charisma to motivate. They build a culture of discipline.
The Essay on What Makes A Good Leader? 2
There are all types of people out there in the world today. Some run huge multi-national companies, some star on our favorite television shows, and some have even won gold at the Olympics. Sadly, most of us are just regular, ordinary, people. Fortunately for us “regulars”, we have influences to look up upon and base our actions off of. We need these people to help us in our lives. A ...
It is not a tyrannical disciplinarian one but one that enables freedom and responsibility: ‘… but leadership is equally about creating a climate where the truth is heard and the brutal facts confronted. There’s a huge difference between the opportunity to ‘have your say’ and the opportunity to be heard. The good-to-great leaders understood the distinction, creating a culture wherein people had a tremendous opportunity to be heard and, ultimately, for the truth to be heard.’ These leaders deliver what they promise. There is no hype, no spin, no excuses; just understated, realistic expectations.
The expectations may be challenging but they are met II. APPLICATION: What seems to be most remarkable from Jim Collins’s tudy is his debunking a well-entrenched idea of “celebrity” leaders. In fact, he proposes that Level 5 leadership is the antithesis of egocentric celebrity. Describing these leaders as “somewhat self-effacing individuals who deflect adulation, yet who have an almost stoic resolve to do absolutely whatever it takes to make the company great, channeling their ego needs away from themselves and into the larger goal of building a great company. It’s not that Level 5 leaders have no ego or self-interest. Indeed, they are incredibly ambitious-but their ambition is first and foremost for the institution and its greatness, not for themselves.” They consistently adhere to what Collins calls the Hedgehog Concept, the intersection of three circles: (1) brutally and realistically determining what the company can be the best in the world at and pursuing it; (2) deciding the most effective way of generating sustained cash flow and profitability, and; (3) doing the things they are deeply passionate about, this passion is not stimulated or imposed but discovered.
The Term Paper on Less Is More how Great Companies Improve Productivity Without Layoffs By Jason Jennings
Less is more (how great companies improve productivity without layoffs) - by Jason Jennings Jason Jennings is a businessman, teacher and writer who has spent a career trying to figure out how to increase productivity, motivate employees, deal with bad bosses and greedy investors while trying to increase profits. Its the great American business juggling act: trying to do more with less. he began ...
For Collins, the implications are obvious: “boards of directors and executives planning for succession would do well to search for the type of leadership- Level 5 leadership-correlated with the best and most enduring results. To do otherwise is to sacrifice long-term effectiveness for short-term expedience, which is tantamount to an act of irresponsibility on behalf of a company’s constituents, including its shareholders. To be clear, Level 5 leadership is not the only requirement for taking a company from good to great and for sustaining greatness once it is attained, but it does appear to be essential.” More surprising is that these great companies never looked too far for their level fives: they have been long-term insiders. From an HR perspective, the results of this study seem to say: hire those with level five potential, nurture them well and give them a career path to concretize their potential, loosely parallel to the Japanese way of “starting from the bottom and proving your way to the top.” Collins advices further that “the key step is to stop looking for out sized personalities and egocentric celebrities, and instead to scrutinize for results.
Look inside for some part of the organization where extraordinary results have been produced but where there is no person standing forth to take excessive credit for those results. Look there and you will likely find a Level 5 leader. And if you feel you must look to the outside (which the good-to-great companies almost never did), then look for people who show the following traits: (1) Creates-and is a clear catalyst in creating-superb results. Yet on the other hand… Demonstrates a compelling modesty, shunning public adulation and never boastful; (2) Demonstrates an unwavering resolve to do whatever must be done to produce the best long-term results, no matter how difficult. Yet on the other hand…
The Essay on 5 great leadership qualities
Leaders are often portrayed as heroes and role models, but there is also a darker side to being a leader. Adolph Hitler was one of the greatest leaders in the last 100 years, if not the greatest leader of all time. One man had the ability to lead a country, with a population of 20 million people, against the whole world in a vision he saw fit. One man leading Germany out of economic depression ...
Acts with quiet, calm determination and relies principally on inspired standards-not an inspiring personality-to motivate; (3) Sets the standard of building an enduring great organization and will settle for nothing less. Yet on the other hand… Channels ambition into the organization and its work, not the self, setting up successors for even greater success in the next generation. III. REFERENCES 1. Jim Collins, “The Misguided Mix-Up of Celebrity and Leadership”, Conference Board Annual Report, Annual Feature Essay, September/October 20012.
Jon Jenkins and Gerrit Visser, “Level 5 Leadership” – yahoo. com search 3. Collins, Jim, ‘Good-to-Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap… and Others Don’t’, Random House, London, 20014. Collins, Jim, ‘Level 5 Leadership: The Triumph of Humility and Fierce Resolve’ Harvard Business Review, Jan.
2001.
