There were many philosophers throughout the Enlightenment period. Some of these great thinkers shared similar views on related ideas, others differed completely. I personally agreed most with John Lockes philosophies. Locke was born in 1632 and died in 1704. His works concerned human nature, how the structure of a society should be set up, and other issues to that effect.
Lockes philosophies and books are all applicable to our society today and some of our countrys political foundations are based on his notable philosophies. I agree with his reasoning on why an absolute monarchy is no form of a civil government. I believe that the people who make the decisions for their country are their country and that the people should have equal power and all be on the same level socially and politically. Like Locke, I believe that a superior to judge between right and wrong and to punish those who do wrong is absolutely necessary, yet the power should be in the hands of the people and not a monarch. Before the enlightenment, both secular and religious worlds were in a power struggle and became extremely corrupt, proving that absolute power corrupts absolutely. Locke stated…
and have a common established law and judicature to appeal to, with authority to decide controversies between them and punish offenders (Civil Society).
I have no doubt that to have structure and a judicial system in a society is essential and without it there would be complete and utter chaos. I also agree with Locke on the subject of why a civil society is better and more productive then living in the state of nature. Lockes state of nature was a state of liberty, and all people were considered equal, but there was no authority to enforce the law which I believe to be greatly problematic. Without laws or government, state or country is bound to be inextricable and completely disorganized which are not good conditions. With such disagreeable circumstances the people are bound to fight with one another and act bestial causing the overall conditions of the state to worsen even more.
The Essay on John Locke State People Nature
... John Locke. "Though men when they enter into society being give up their equality, liberty, and executive power they had in the state of Nature ... to dominion and sovereignty." For people to confirm the state of Nature, a law is set that obliges people to follow and consult it. ... so to do, they make laws without authority, which the people are not therefore bound to obey; by which means they ...
Locke philosophized that a civil state should be formed for three significant reasons; an established law was needed, authority to judge right from wrong according to the established law, and a power to back and support the sentence when right and give it due execution (Why Form a Civil Society).
I find these three reasons to be substantive in our society today and without those factors our society would be in a disordered situation where nothing functions correctly and all people are corrupt.
