After the dethronement of Louis XVI, politics for the first time in France had become an issue for the French to systemize and regulate. No longer did the citizens have to follow the will of the kings’ “godly design” but now would be represented by a republic of the people. Very quickly political factions began to emerge across France. The two major political factions of the Convention were the Jacobins and the Girondins, which held very opposite beliefs of the future of the monarchy. However, both had a strong ambition to gain supremacy in the Convention and to ultimately control the direction of the Revolution. Although in doing so the factions had to gain the support of the Marais, the group that did not belong to any faction.
The first issue for the elected deputies of France was to determine the fate of the former King of France, Louis XVI. The strong will of the Jacobin’s beliefs and the ineffective representation of Girondin philosophy strengthened Jacobin support and ultimately determined the death of Louis XVI. All three political groups were not the same as the ones found in today’s political campaigns. These historic parties had, “no party machinery, no party funds, no party discipline on voting and in most cases no party platform. They were at best loosely-connected groups of men who had been friends, who shared political ideas, or who were thrown together on specific issues.” However the citizens believed them to be their representatives in the new regime that would debate for the good of the country based on the new principles. The Jacobin faction was formerly the Society of the Friends of the Constitution and was made up of intelligent bourgeoisie.
The Essay on Dante Alighieri and Rival Political Factions
The symbolism of the three beasts in Inferno I The three beasts, a leopard, a lion and a she-wolf, which impede Dante’s path as he tries to climb the sunlit hill, represent dark forces that threaten mankind. There are three interpretations that the beasts symbolize. Firstly the beasts represent the sins of lust, the leopard, pride, the lion, and avarice, the she-wolf. Second, the three beasts have ...
After the Assembly moved to Paris the group enlarged and rented the former residence of the Dominican monks which were known as the Jacobins, a name eventually inherited by the society. The Jacobins strongly supported power in Paris, and heavily pushed egalitarian aspirations. The Jacobins firmly believed that their group represented the people. During the course of the trial of Louis XVI the approximately one hundred and ten members of the Mountain (as they were referred to in the convention because of their choice of the higher seating) believed that Louis should be “judged by the highest tribunal in the land, the people in the revolution on August the 10, 1792.” Their final conclusion was that Louis was guilty of treason and that he should be punished by way of the guillotine. The only way for the ancient regime to be totally annihilated was to see the death of Louis XVI. They believed there to be no other confounding factors in this decision and that the trial should be concluded quickly and the beheading of Louis to be done immediately.
To accomplish this goal, the horrific fate of Louis, the Jacobins had to win the appeal of the Marais. The Marais made up the largest group of deputies in the Convention. If the Jacobins won the appeal of the Marais they would win the majority of any vote in the Convention and would dictate the future of Louis XVI and France. The Jacobins had the major disadvantage in the beginning of the trial as far as political support was concerned, being outnumbered by almost double. However, this did not discourage them for the Jacobin had as great an amount of prestigious leaders as the Girondin. These great Jacobin speakers eventually would be the vital factor in the rise of the Mountain.
The Jacobin replied to all the Girondin challenges and answered with great knowledge and confidence. Continuously downplaying Girondin condemnation, the Jacobin slowly gained the lustre of the dominant faction and discretely gained the support of the Marais. In the battle words the oratorical battle of strength clearly was one by the Jacobins. Their timing and responses, such as Robespierre’s counter to Louvet’s challenge, more then made up for the damage, if any, caused by the Girondin.
The Term Paper on Louis Xvi Political Napoleon Colonies
HIS 102-WESTERN CIVILIZATION II Terms & Key Words-Section II Topic #2: The Reign of Terror and the Guillotine Storming of the Tuileries (Aug 1792): revolutionary event during which the king's Swiss Guards were massacred by the Paris mob, forcing Louis XVI to seek refuge with the National Assembly, which took him prisoner Philippe Ega lite: adopted name of the Duke of Orleans, who was a cousin ...
In the end this one sided battle showed that the Jacobins were the dominant force. The political faction, the Girondins, developed in history as a result of Jacobin propaganda. The name Girondins came from the Department of the Gironde, even though not many of its deputies came from the Gironde. The Girondin were afraid of radical Paris and its Commune, feared the social revolution and egalitarianism seeing it as anarchy in balancing the French society and labelled the Jacobins as a “blood-thirsty and undisciplined mob…
shamelessly manipulating Parisians.” Girondins believed that Louis the XVI would be of better use kept alive and utilized as a figurehead to guide a more powerful new regime. The Girondins came to the Convention with a considerate advantage in headcounts and in political continuity. The Girondins controlled the offices of the Convention and had the support of the president who basically controlled the order of the Convention. This clearly gave an advantage to the Girondin to set about destroying their enemies the Jacobins.
The Girondins acknowledged this and from the opening of the Convention showed no real interest bringing the king to trial. They were more interested in discrediting Jacobins, Paris and its deputies. This was the major flaw of the Girondins that eventually led to their downfall. The Girondin became too busy in trying to raise their command status and the Marais saw the Girondin lack of focus to the task at hand. This lack of focus caused the Girondin to act more as individuals then as a political party and the Girondins could never come to a definite decision. There were always exceptions to each vote and issue and their variance in their principles made them weak.
The Essay on Disruption Of Order In King Lear And The Causes
ter> Disorder in the Court "Order from disorder sprung." (Paradise Lost) A [kingdom] without order is a [kingdom] in chaos (Bartelby.com). In Shakespeare's tragic play, King Lear, the audience witnesses to the devastation of a great kingdom. Disorder engulfs the land once Lear transfers his power to his daughters, but as the great American writer, A.C. Bradley said, The ultimate power in the ...
Some in the faction stated to the Convention that Louis XVI was to be tried with some continuity with the previous laws and procedures of criminal justice and that Louis should be tried as a normal citizen, others in the faction stated that the king wasn’t a normal citizen and that special laws must be developed for him. But still as the trial continued the Girondin instead of seizing the initiative in the trial and deal with the king they continually went after the Jacobins and did everything they could to delay the trial, which only angered many of the deputies of the other groups, and the people of France. They totally ignored the task at hand in trying to win the appeal of the Marais and basically drove them to the opposition. And for this reason the Girondins ended up losing their once cherished majority in the Convention. The Girondin now were on the defensive and made an attempt to gain favour by posing to the convention that Louis XVI’s fate should not be judged by the small amount of people in the Convention but all of France. “The proposed ‘appeal to the people’ would take away the radical influence of Paris and balance it out more with the ratification of 44, 000 primary assemblies of Revolutionary France.” The Girondin believed the appeal to be the best connection with the people of the Marais’ newfound sympathy for Louis after his defence.
They believed that the majority of the people would now support the sparing of the king and vote for the appeal, resulting in the defeat of the Mountain. Yet again the Girondins displayed frailty to the Mountain as Saint-Andre pointed out to the Convention that the “several versions of the appeal represented the usual hypocrisy of the Girondins.” However the Girondins lost the vote because of the inability of the faction to decide as one. Now the Girondin had lost their chance to control the Convention, destroy the Mountain, and direct the Revolution. The well-built stance in Jacobin interests and their capability to come together and vote as a single party along with their mental and oral control in the Convention fully overcame the unfocused and pitiful attempts of the Girondins to gain authority. The switch of power from the Girondins to the Jacobins decided that Louis XVI former King of France would be executed by way of the guillotine and that the Mountain would gain future control in the deciding factors of the new regime. “It was not so much that the Jacobins won the initiative in the trial and the Convention when the appeal to the people had failed as that the Girondins had lost it.” David Jordan.
The Essay on King Hussein bin Talal
Many individuals desire power to create change and leave a mark in history. Though some were successful in achieving this, many were left to do their part and contribute to the betterment of many. One man was able to do this and create his own legacy; an unending desire to develop and create his lasting marks both in the Muslim and Western world. This man, a born leader and dreamer, is King ...
The King’s Trial: Louis XVI vs. the French Revolution. Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1979, pg# 48 Jordan, pg# 20 IbidJordan, pg# 58-59 IbidJordan, pg# 50-53 Ibid Jordan, pg#143 Ibid Jordan, pg# 147-148 Ibid Jordan, pg#176-177 Ibid Bibliography 1) Jordan, David. The Kings Trial: Louis XVI vs.
the French Revolution. Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1979.
