Before we start to take sides, we need to discuss the different point of views of Madison and Marshall. We have to understand that our political landscape during the birth of our nation was much different. The states, were not unified, and were made up of different and often conflicting interests. Along with factions fighting one another and making political progress impossible. As Madison, would describe faction as a number of citizens; whether it be a majority or minority whole, who were motivate by some common impulse of passion or of interest. This broad definition would include the interest groups who dominate the political landscape today.
In Madison’s work of Federalist No. 10, he identifies factions were a problem. He views them as “a dangerous vice”, but at the same time saw factions as a necessary evil. He mentions that “The regulation of these various and interfering interest forms the principal task of modern legislation; and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of government.” Here Madison states that factions, opposed in spirit to democratic ideals, spreading “unsteadiness and injustice” which are actually necessary for the function of a representative government. Throughout his paper, Madison explains how pure democracy wouldn’t be able to work, because it had “no cure for the mischief of faction.” He believed that this type of government will give so much power to the majority that it was doomed to fail. He sounded very confident that the new constitution would work.
The Essay on Terrorism The Cause Governments Political
TERRORISM Terrorism is the use of violence or the threat of violence to create a climate of fear in a given population. Terrorist violence targets ethnic or religious groups, governments, political parties, corporations and media enterprises. The three main types of terrorism are: political, religious and governments. Political terrorism is recently the most often type of terrorism used. Political ...
He believed of having a representative and a republic system. He had no doubt in mind that new constitution would be the end of the states embarrassment to the world. Madison saw democracy not as an ideal but something that could be modified to be fitted. Two hundreds years later Thurgood Marshall said that Constitution written by our Founding Fathers was a defect from the start.
As he said the first three words of the Constitution says “We the People” was a flaw. At the time our Founding Fathers didn’t have in mind the majority of Americans. The only thing on their mind was the wealthy population. Also he states how some things they wrote wasn’t place in action years later.
For example “all humans are created equal.” This was a defect; it took an amendment to make this in effect. But Madison did say he couldn’t foresee the future of the government to the effects it could have. Marshall was more worry about people rights, but at the moment our Founding Fathers didn’t think that was an issue. The issue was giving power to the central government, and having the majority a. k.
a. wealthy people comprise with the minority a. k. a. poor people. It is obvious as Marshall said rights weren’t equal to everyone living in the United States.
But Madison was more worry about the political rights rather than people rights. He assumed that by creating a strong central government everything could be solved. As for Marshall he views that the Founding Fathers of the constitution shouldn’t be celebrated or praise. But then one may say if they haven’t had written the constitution we wouldn’t be where we are now.
Marshall views of democracy as an ideal of people rights; giving all human beings that same rights, and equality they deserve. Madison believed that democracy does not allow minorities to dominate. But like Madison said the problems lie on the majorities. As for my part, I believe that Marshall was very erroneous by not accepting the constitutional celebration. Our Founding Fathers of who wrote this incredible paper, that only required 27 Amendments so far; deserve a celebration. Yes, as Marshall stated it took a bloody civil war to give Black Americans rights, and yes, the constitution failed.
The Essay on Motivation in History: Charles Beard and the Founding Fathers
Throughout history there are all kinds of historians that describe about our history and how we got to where we are. Charles Beard is a unique historian because he talks about the motives on our history event by not just any event. This issue created a lot of debate on what Charles Beard believed and that is the motives of the Founding Fathers. Charles Beard published An Economic Interpretation of ...
But yet Madison and others through the constitution kept the nation together.
