Do you think most managers in the 21st century would describe their jobs in the same way? I think most managers in the 21st century would describe their jobs in the same way which is manager is a difficult job. Over 30 years ago Larry Ross described the corporation as a jungle in where everybody had to be alert, even the CEO. “You’re thrown in on your own and you’re constantly battling to survive. ” “It is a question of living or dying. And what is happening in nowadays? I believe that no matter where you’re living in right now, you often see people are fight for their jobs, because everyone has their own families to feed. They will step on each others just to secure their jobs. Even if you are the manager, there are always guys that under you trying to take your spot. Especially, who are middle and upper managers, they will be under a lot of pressures. Like Larry Ross said, “ I don’t know of any situation in the corporate world where an executive is completely free and sure of his job from moment to moment.
So over 30 years, things haven’t changed so much. Manager is still a very difficult and high- pressure job. 2)Does Larry Ross provide an accurate and realistic picture of how organizations operate? If you think so, it is true of all, most, some, or only a few organizations? Why did you answer as you did? I think Larry Ross provide a pretty accurate and realistic picture of how LARGE organizations operate. I believe that many years ago or nowadays, the larger or older a corporation is, the more rigid it is. There are always three classes in every large corporations.
The Essay on Analysis of Larry Ross
Analysis of Larry Ross Case In this case, Larry Ross, a self-proclaimed advisor to top management, shows us a real, vivid and accurate picture of organization from different aspects, such as human resource, communication, loyalty and so on. I will do analysis of Larry Ross Case from following three parts: the person and situation, attitude and employee loyalty. The person and situation — behavior ...
First, there are the black or white people who are ambitious, want to be the leaders. Second are the gray people who come from nine to five, do their jobs and don’t care much about anything else. Finally, above all of them are the board of directors who’s really playing the role of God, control everything. All they ever care are their profits in the business. And when things go bad, they will protect themselves and fire everyone. But like I said above it is just how LARGE corporations would often behave this way. There are new or small corporations would operate in an idealistic way.
It means that the top manager actually do care about the life of the employee. They want to increase their profits of the corporations, but also they want to improve the employee’s life. But like Ross said the more older a organization gets, the more rigid it will be. So I think that many years in the future, we will see more corporations operate in the more human way. 3) Is the organization better (or worse) off if managers behave like Larry Ross? Why? Do you think Larry Ross would be successful in the most 21st-century organizations?
I think that organizations are worse off if managers behave like Larry Ross. Because, one of the idealistic skill needed by managers is Human( interpersonal) skill which is able to work and to manage relationships with others alone or in groups. But his type of management causes lack of communication in the organization. Ross said, “ he cant confide and talk with the guys working under him. He cant confide and talk to the man he’s working for. ” Simply, he just doesn’t trust in others. He’s afraid of others will take advantage of what he said to take over his spot, so he’s always alert.
But the ideal of managing is that a manager is the connection between the top manager and the employee. So I don’t think Larry Ross did a good job in doing that. Anyhow, like my last assumption, most nowadays operations still behave in a rigid way, so Larry Ross would still be successful in most 21st-century organizations. 4) Assuming that you would like to become an executive in a large organization, would you be willing to do the things Ross does to achieve your goal? Why? I would not willing to do the same things Ross does to achieve my goal.
The Term Paper on Supervisors And Manager Employees Organization Mrwmd
I'd give you an A, not many mistakes. Just check on a few things. ORGANIZSATION CULTUREATMRWMD: DOES IT SUPPORT THE ORGANIZSATION MISSION? Table of contents? Introduction 1. The Monterey Regional Waste Management District (MRWMD) had humble beginnings in 1951 when forward thinking county officials had a vision of a better waste management system for the Monterey Peninsula, ending the era of ...
I’d rather choose the high involvement management type. I will do any efforts to impact on my employees’ attitude. I will motive them and make sure everyone is on the same page. I think when everyone has the same goal, it will be easier to get there. I also want to improve my employees’ lives outside of work, because I believe that if the are happy and comfortable with their lives, they will work more effectively. 5) Do you see Larry Ross as a person who has largely contributed to his own problems, or as a person who simply goes along with a world he did not create? Why?
I think that Ross simply just goes along with a world that he did not create. Like he said he was in various corporations. He saw how most organizations operate. With his management skill he couldn’t do anything to change those organizations. He had to adapt himself to the environment of rigid organizations. Nowadays, it’s still the problem. When we talk about organizations, immediately we think about the bureaucratic system. It’s always about the Money and Power. There’re always corruption in everywhere we go to. Hopefully, the world will be a better place in the near future.